Hiraga "Le Monstre"

Hi

Is it possible to use the Hifistor boards with the original transistors without any changes, if I find any?

If I replace the 47k resistor at the amplifier input by another 50k resistor (in fact, I'm thinking of using 2 x 100k resistors, with a tolerance of 0.05%, in parallel), this would cause some damage or significant change in the amplifier's parameters. ?

I read on some forum that the input resistors (1k2 and 47k) should have the smallest tolerance possible to preserve the integrity of the input signal as much as possible, so I bought Caddock 1k2 0.01% and TE Connectivity 100K 0.05% ( 2 in parallel) to replace the originals.

But I'll only find out the result when I finish my assembly, which will take a long time...

Thank you guys!
Nilton
 
You can use the Hifistor boards, but I suggest to respect the resistor original values.
I have used z-foil resistors in my Hiraga amplifier. They are very expensive but it was worth it.
If you are planning to use that board, pay attention to the small transistors pinouts!
 
Last edited:
I read on some forum that the input resistors (1k2 and 47k) should have the smallest tolerance possible to preserve the integrity of the input signal as much as possible, so I bought Caddock 1k2 0.01% and TE Connectivity 100K 0.05% ( 2 in parallel) to replace the originals.
2x 100k 0.05% in parallel is 50k 0.035%.
Which is something like 6% with respect to 47k, not ?

Not quite smallest tolerance possible ?

to preserve the integrity of the input signal as much as possible,

Can you enlighten us how a say 0.01% resistor will preserve the input signal better than say 1% ?


Thanks in advance,
Patrick
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: petoluk
Hi

Is it possible to use the Hifistor boards with the original transistors without any changes, if I find any?

If I replace the 47k resistor at the amplifier input by another 50k resistor (in fact, I'm thinking of using 2 x 100k resistors, with a tolerance of 0.05%, in parallel), this would cause some damage or significant change in the amplifier's parameters. ?

I read on some forum that the input resistors (1k2 and 47k) should have the smallest tolerance possible to preserve the integrity of the input signal as much as possible, so I bought Caddock 1k2 0.01% and TE Connectivity 100K 0.05% ( 2 in parallel) to replace the originals.

But I'll only find out the result when I finish my assembly, which will take a long time...

Thank you guys!
Nilton
Respect the resistor original values
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoundBrazil
Hi my friends
here my pcb Hiraga 8W untested....
and the other pcb with the jfet gace to face but double layer.
 

Attachments

  • HIRAGA.JPG
    HIRAGA.JPG
    306.6 KB · Views: 125
  • HIRAGA.JPG
    HIRAGA.JPG
    320.6 KB · Views: 128
  • HIRAGA3.JPG
    HIRAGA3.JPG
    321.3 KB · Views: 121
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: m0rten
Αnd i have these parts...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20241120_153035.jpg
    IMG_20241120_153035.jpg
    456.5 KB · Views: 120
  • IMG_20241120_210314.jpg
    IMG_20241120_210314.jpg
    325.9 KB · Views: 130
  • IMG_20241120_152945.jpg
    IMG_20241120_152945.jpg
    329.5 KB · Views: 120
  • IMG_20241120_152726.jpg
    IMG_20241120_152726.jpg
    175.5 KB · Views: 119
  • IMG_20241120_152800.jpg
    IMG_20241120_152800.jpg
    197.6 KB · Views: 128
Hi ,...after good check .
Dimensions are 56mm x 50mm
I haven't read many posts about this amplifier.
Could someone please let me know what about the bias ?
Has anyone built the schematic below?
and what combination of transistors can we use?
 

Attachments

  • HIRAGA 2BRD.JPG
    HIRAGA 2BRD.JPG
    318.3 KB · Views: 138
  • HIRAGA1BRD.JPG
    HIRAGA1BRD.JPG
    317.5 KB · Views: 85
  • HIRAGA1.JPG
    HIRAGA1.JPG
    327.6 KB · Views: 85
  • HIRAGA 2.JPG
    HIRAGA 2.JPG
    329.6 KB · Views: 130
  • 1641081373753.png
    1641081373753.png
    23 KB · Views: 138
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: decramer
Hello Nikos, bias should be between 500 and 600mA. That will be a challenge if you use 2SK170 / 2SJ74 in the BL range, range y ist not realy existent, but GR is available and should be used. Matched to a IDSS as low as possible, if you manage to be around IDSS 3mA the 1k R has to be reduced to about 750R. Better to read a lot about this little amp, very good but there are some challenges while building.
Many users have a bias of 1A and more, the sound is not to my liking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nikos
That will be a challenge if you use 2SK170 / 2SJ74 in the BL range, range y ist not realy existent, but GR is available and should be used.
Hi thanks for your responce.
it will be a challenge due to high IDSS ? My fets idss = 7.4ma 2sj74 and 2sk170 9.6ma

there are some challenges while building.
Would you like to be more specific?
 
Last edited:
VR100 is only to balance out the offset.

R3 / R4 need to be changed to alter bias. Higher value means higher bias. Take a higher value for the potentiometer across R3/R4.
J1 and J2 should be selected for same IDSS, Original Monster has FETs grade y with IDSS of about 2.4 mA (9 V), but nobody has seen grade since 40 years. I use grade GR around 3.6 mA and R3/R4 around 750 ohm for bias 0.6 A, that means about 900 ohm for 1 A bias (only roughly estimated values)
Understand .....so in my case with fets BL idss 7-9ma must change the two resistors 1ΚΩ to lower value 470Ω?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: konst
Hello Nikos,
I don't like to me unfriendly but all of this is already writen several times in this thread, not only by me but also by others, just scroll 2 pages back.
IDDS of your Fets are not only way to high but also not matched, this will end in an offset, maybe you can compensate with the pot of 100R. But this pot does't alter the bias, only offset.
If you have problems with the Fets (to find some) please contact me by PM
Sometimes the amp oscillates, this may be solved with 47 nF over 200R fedback.
It's highly advisable to read this thread, there are so many information to avoid frustration by building this nice little amp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio and Nikos
2x 100k 0.05% in parallel is 50k 0.035%.
Which is something like 6% with respect to 47k, not ?

Not quite smallest tolerance possible ?

Yes, it makes sense.

Can you enlighten us how a say 0.01% resistor will preserve the input signal better than say 1% ?

Well, I don't know if it is, Im here to know if it is... Technically I understand that the signal will be more linear, but if at that level it can be perceived by the ear, that's what I would like to know

Member AdrianL uses ZFoil resistors and like it, could it be due its tolerance, or due to the type of material used in its construction?

Tks
Nilton
 
Yes I did use z-foil resistor. You can see them in the picture attached.
The difference is in sound quality. It is more precise and more detailed. Of course, this is not only the advantage of using Z-foil resistor. You must also use the other components as close to the original as possible. And make sure they are the original.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1581.JPG
    IMG_1581.JPG
    324.6 KB · Views: 134
  • Like
Reactions: SoundBrazil