Obnoxious Part Numbers
- By H713
- The Lounge
- 12 Replies
I think it's time for a more light-hearted, frivolous thing to be annoyed by: Part numbers.
Historically, transistor part numbers have followed one of three part numbering schemes. Some of them were really nice and even told you the polarity and type just in the part number.
However, not all transistors follow this. Some manufacturers seem to have decided to use "secure password generators" to come up with their part numbers. In particular, part numbers like the IPB60R070CFD7ATMA1 come to mind. In contrast to the JEDEC, JIS and Pro-Electron, I like to call this the "Cat barfed on the keyboard" part numbering scheme. Part numbers of this extreme length are a general tail pain when it comes to drafting schematics and are nearly impossible to remember.
Feel free to post irritating part numbers like this here. In case you're wondering where the rant came from, I've been trying to catalog my stock of parts. These numbers are not fun to enter into a spreadsheet.
Historically, transistor part numbers have followed one of three part numbering schemes. Some of them were really nice and even told you the polarity and type just in the part number.
However, not all transistors follow this. Some manufacturers seem to have decided to use "secure password generators" to come up with their part numbers. In particular, part numbers like the IPB60R070CFD7ATMA1 come to mind. In contrast to the JEDEC, JIS and Pro-Electron, I like to call this the "Cat barfed on the keyboard" part numbering scheme. Part numbers of this extreme length are a general tail pain when it comes to drafting schematics and are nearly impossible to remember.
Feel free to post irritating part numbers like this here. In case you're wondering where the rant came from, I've been trying to catalog my stock of parts. These numbers are not fun to enter into a spreadsheet.