The marriage

what is better
I had completely ignored that the buffer is used also for setting the gate voltage of the sit that now doesn’t need to be in a certain range to have the circuit working. I don’t have my sits vgs in that range anyway so I will need it.
If I remember correctly what I read somewhere on the forum, it is possible that the sits don’t have gate leakage current when measured but could develop after being used which is bad for the biasing circuit and could damage my speakers because of the dc offset created.

So in my case it covers 2 things: makes the circuit work and also makes it future proof.

Everybody needs to pay the cost in learning a lesson
Everybody that doesn’t know ZM and the helpful guys around here 😎
 
......

So in my case it covers 2 things: makes the circuit work and also makes it future proof.
.....
if not SITs, your ears are happier, when SIT Gate is guided with gentle but firm squeeze

:clown:

what's there not to like - any Ugs SIT can be used, even those with slight gate leakage can be used, less THD at higher freq., even with passive network DC Offset is gentle and stable.... yadayada

some Boyz still prefer to use Kosher approach - simplest possible biasing and nuttin' in front of SIT Gate, but there are two groups ( as always) - one doing it that way for fun and just because, and second doing it that way thinking that simpler is better

yeah, simpler is (almost) always better when speaking about signal path, but whenever I end satisfied with final construction, I can tell that there are benefits vs. simpler

of course, it's just wishful thinking - to get immediately to best and final iteration, but that's life; example - "original" SissySIT, then R.2 ...... then R.3

even if done primarily with Futile Attempts Approach, I'm bloody content with overall work and outcome
 
I do like how the actual amps sound but I am also curious to try those sits everyone talks about.
Now with all the ideas and tricks that are around here it’s simpler than ever to build something but even like this I do like to ask first to be sure I am on the right track.

I have my magic smoke experinces and I know the feeling, most of them aren’t in the audio field. I work with lithium batteries and learned a lot from there where the damage is bigger and happens a lot faster.
 
the diyaudio site load very difficult on my side and most probably the photo didn’t upload because of that.

Edit: for the gain I need the Iron Pre is more than enough and it remained inside the preamp.
 

Attachments

  • B57A765F-61AB-4478-A6C6-8CC781CBBD54.jpeg
    B57A765F-61AB-4478-A6C6-8CC781CBBD54.jpeg
    326.6 KB · Views: 153
  • 5F41B57F-AC43-4DA8-8A4B-23DB2DB8156C.jpeg
    5F41B57F-AC43-4DA8-8A4B-23DB2DB8156C.jpeg
    310.4 KB · Views: 158
Merry Christmas!

Yesterday I had the chance to put a few watts on the speakers through the boo and iron pre😎
The iron pre could give another 5db of gain but didn’t reach the maximum level with it yet(the volume was set at 0db and max is 5db).
I forgot to measure(wass too caught up with the music) but I guess there were ~5W. Even if on the fft at this levels the thd of boo is pretty high the sound is terrific.

Later I will try different mosfets on the outputs for much lower thd just to make an idea of the difference between low and high thd.

https://35.filelu.com/d/rn3clpdkjqq...q43c3zq564gmocqw6gwvtlwgdwucohel/IMG_2632.MOV
 
something is fishy with your measurements

speaking of Boo itself - roughly, you can expect double or even triple of what you get in sims, depending of models used

which is still damn low

just checked - for 8Vpp, I'm getting 3 zeros after, with Cordel mosfet models

edit- that was with 1A8 Iq pper phase (sum 3A6 for channel)

checked with 1A Iq per phase, 2A channel - it's 0.001

if you're having sum Iq of 1A, well ...... build some other amp in that case 🙂

sim for 0A5 per phase, sum 1A, THD is 0.0043
 
Last edited: