Rush Cascode Headphone Amp + JLH Output Stage

Status
Not open for further replies.
adjusting the compensation has had an enormous affect on the sound. ....................
.................. the sharpness of the earlier prototype was emphasizing higher octaves ................
.................... but I only changed compensation, how would LF linearity be affected?)... I am totally weirded out by this, the difference in sound is just uncanny................
overshoot visible in the squarewave is a visual way of saying the amplifier overamplifies fast transients, but applies the correct amplification to slower signals.

In music some of the signals are low frequency and some are mid frequency and some are high frequency.
Many of the mid and treble frequencies are the constituent of the harmonic structure that is a fast transient of a lower frequency. If the amp overamplifies some of these harmonic constituents then the sound that emanates will have an emphasised HF (sharpness) relative to the fundamental of that transient.

test this same amplifier with a non changing sinewave at any frequency in it's pass band and it will show constant amplification.

It's the amplifier's inaccurate transient response that changes the sound. This must be eliminated or minimised for the truth to shine through.
 
I can confirm that it can be tweaked to make the overshoot small or even eliminate. In simulation at least.

One thing I noticed is that the output transistors have a large impact on the behaviour of this amp. Can you give BD140 or 2SC5171 a try?
 
I only have mysterious 2SC4370's to use. They are similar to the 2SC4793, but the datasheet gives no detailed information.

Andrew, I believe you are right. However, I have to turn the squarewave up to 500KHz before the overshoot is visible (at audio frequencies, it is perfect). My PSP can't be putting out anything higher than 22KHz, and the simulator shows no change in specs at audio frequencies.

The Niceness knob in the first plot is turned all the way off, minimizing distortion. In the second plot, it is rotated to 100 ohms, nearly full on. The Niceness knob adds distortion, that is it's purpose. It is intended to add mostly 2nd and even order harmonics. The axes are labeled correctly.

- keantoken
 
Parallel a batch of small signal transistors, its only +/-6V into 8 ohms...
0.5625W per polarity, assuming worst dissipation +/-3V 50% square wave.
Two half Watters per rail should be enough. Can secondary breakdown
happen with only 3V (or must always figure against the "full" 6 or 12?)

Did I give you small signal clip-on heatsinks, or is that "2nd box" stuff?
 
Last edited:
Well, a day has passed and the amp is passing the time test... However the compensation is taking a little longer than expected, because of the effect on the sound. It may take longer to get it just right...

I'm slightly disappointed, the Niceness knob after the compensation changes sounds more like an SQ knob. Turning it up makes the sound worse. :/ I will fiddle with it a little more to make sure I'm not missing something.

This amp sure shines on piano pieces. I'm testing it with a speaker and it's working great... Why not make a power amp version? 😉 For the Betsys I'm using, 2W is good enough, I could upgrade the outputs and increase bias current, and it would be pretty darn perfect for high-efficiency fullrangers...

But of course, that is off in the uncertain future...

- keantoken
 
Okay, after testing several extremes of compensation values and having them all seem to fall short, it is beginning to seem like there really is a "sweet spot". R2 seems to have the largest affect, I'm not sure if R14 has one. For a 20-turn trimmer the best method I've found is to adjust the trimmer lower until ringing increases, then back it off a turn or two until you can't see the waveform change while turning. Tomorrow I will adjust the trimmer in real-time and see if I can track down this sweet spot, or test my imagination.

- keantoken
 
Someone commented about my workstation. I suppose I do have enough equipment to do a few interesting things... Though I would prefer a nicer signal generator. Not many parts to throw together either.

I thought I was obligated to post a decent picture of my workstation head-on, without that ugly speaker in the way. It is currently playing, as can be seen on the scope and DMM, through the right speaker in the second picture.

However I think the last picture is what will make you drool...

- keantoken
 

Attachments

  • DCP00785.JPG
    DCP00785.JPG
    351.8 KB · Views: 179
  • DCP00788.JPG
    DCP00788.JPG
    332.1 KB · Views: 165
  • DCP00790.JPG
    DCP00790.JPG
    277.9 KB · Views: 169
Okay, I've had a few lazy days for casual listening.

It sounds better than my car amp for sure. I would prefer it to sound as good as my headphones plugged into the source, but I think that is asking too much. Although it is better in one way: I am consistently impressed with this amp's ability to reproduce music enjoyably. Even with my headphones plugged directly into the source, the highs are better and the sound is clearer, but the emotional impact and involvement is lost. I think the compensation can still be improved, it still has some ways to go.

I haven't yet tested into actual headphones. Using the speaker is much easier and less stressful, I only have one pair of good headphones in the house.

- keantoken
 

Attachments

  • DCP00794.JPG
    DCP00794.JPG
    211.5 KB · Views: 200
  • DCP00795.JPG
    DCP00795.JPG
    247.4 KB · Views: 183
  • DCP00796.JPG
    DCP00796.JPG
    258.7 KB · Views: 182
The "effective capacity" reading on the capacitor tester is interesting. Most electrolytics only have an "effective capacity" about half their capacitance value - however, a golden orange NCC 470uF cap from 1979 has an unusually good figure of 400uF. Annoying, since you can't tell the actual value, but useful at the same time.

- keantoken
 

Attachments

  • DCP00798.JPG
    DCP00798.JPG
    256.2 KB · Views: 186
Last edited:
I've added that fancy looking cap to my headphone amp for the hell of it (beats the 6800uF I had in there before), as well as the Ero MKC1863 I got from an old TV. Let's see if anything changes...

- keantoken
 

Attachments

  • DCP00805.JPG
    DCP00805.JPG
    349.4 KB · Views: 167
I do believe the change is for the better.

With the smaller feedback cap, bias is much easier to tune (a large feedback cap will magnify small offset changes).

Everything does seem to sound better. Seems to sound more musical, instruments are fuller.

Anyways, although it was an impulsive move, anything could have been better than that 6.3V 3300uF (not 6800u in fact) cap (now 470u, with mylar 1u bypass), and the input cap used to be mylar, polycarbonate can't be a bad move, especially an Ero MKC.

I also removed the Niceness circuitry, it seems to affect stability and as I've discovered, the compensation is crucial for this amp. I may try it again under more controlled circumstances. Anyone wishing to try for themselves shouldn't be worried, compensation is only affect at the very highest extreme setting.

- keantoken
 
Last edited:
FYI, this is the worst case spectrum driving my current load, the Wild Burro BetsyK. Worst impedance is about 5.4ohms at 250Hz. Even so, it is the best sound I've heard!

PS: all my simulations for a few months have been on Linux. Latest UbuntuStudio, running LTSpice on WINE. It's faster than on windows, which rocks. There is some UI weirdness, but only small things. Linux sounds better too I believe (Ubuntustudio specifically is geared towards multimedia production, including audio - my reasoning for choosing this distribution was it was best suited for audio).

- keantoken
 

Attachments

  • HeadRush1V_5.4ohm.png
    HeadRush1V_5.4ohm.png
    10.5 KB · Views: 133
Status
Not open for further replies.