Pearl 3 Burning Amp 2023

Single chassis prototype is singing. This is in a linestage chassis that is temporarily being repurposed for this test. Sounds great so far! I’ll move these boards to a 2 box setup next. First I need to finalize a couple of details with Gianluca.

Raw PSU rails are about +/- 22V

This setup is using a Shelter 901 MC set at 100R. High gain. And the first record Tasmanian NWOTHM / Doom band The Wizar’d.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9936.jpeg
    IMG_9936.jpeg
    633.8 KB · Views: 262
  • IMG_9937.jpeg
    IMG_9937.jpeg
    441.8 KB · Views: 268
Hello @6L6 and all,

Several people have this Pearl 3 up and running.

Will someone measure the voltage across resistors; R4, R5, R6, and R7.

The schematic for Pearl 2 I believe shows 0.057 volts which calculates out to 0.057 volts which calculates to 5.7ma.

Thanks DT
My Pearl 3 prototype was 0.026 V with 2sk170GR, in the simulation with LSK170A it was a bit lower @2.5mA This coincides with the optimal current through the ZTX851 for lowest noise (per AoE) of 10mA.

I won't build a Pearl 3 until the boards are generally available through the store, so no listening tests until after Christmas!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DualTriode
Assume power supply voltage noise at the output of the LM7815, is RAILNOISE volts (over a 44 kHz bandwidth)
  • RAILNOISE = 250 microvolts over a 44 kHz bandwidth; from TI LM7915 datasheet. (The worst noise spec of all 7915 datasbeets)
Remember that before the cap multiplier, the LM7815,7915 have 10uF on the input and output. The 7915's probably draw only 10mA.

Those 7915 I have (vintage Nat Semi) measure less noise voltage than that spec'd in the TI data-sheet, but this may be anomalous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DualTriode
Small thing to note, probably only of note to those of us fetishists who enjoy measuring things. In Groner's ULN amplifier article in Linear Audio he suggests that when the JFET runs cooler, it also runs quieter. Next thing you know we will be using liquid helium to cool them in a Dewar flask.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6L6
There are particular ones just for that, also nitrogen does not count, does it?

I think that Scott Wurcer mentioned that there were diminishing returns to going below a certain temperature, but I will let you solid-state physicists figure that out and report back. I had a lovely undergrad summer doing that stuff, but the memories are lost to the mists of time!
 
Hi Wayne,
As a suggestion, on Sam Groner’s LNA, he put down a dummy sot23 footprint and bias resistors so that you could match the specified bf862 jfet devices. Instructions were to Populate your regulator test area only, test/select jfets using DMM and tweezers, finish populating.
Just a minor pcb rev for a lot of convenience in selecting the jfets
Rick
 
Damn... after doubting for a long time which one to build (pearl 2 or Salas).. i almost finished my Salas UFSP and now there comes a pearl 3.... 😂
Ah well... we will see, i still have some 2sk170bl left, maybe i build it as well and see which one will stay haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6L6
Well this is my first step into hifi diy.... so probably more will come... 😂
I was thinking 3 diy tube guitar amps was enough, so lets try something different. Im a little sensitive to diy addiction 🙄😂

If you gonna build the pearl 3 i will be curious about what you think in comparison with the FSP 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6L6
Damn... after doubting for a long time which one to build (pearl 2 or Salas).. i almost finished my Salas UFSP and now there comes a pearl 3.... 😂
Ah well... we will see, i still have some 2sk170bl left, maybe i build it as well and see which one will stay haha
In the "Pearl Domain" the P3 is likely to be easier to build. Folks had some issues with the P-Channel mosfet in the final stage of the P2 -- static sensitive.

The power supply for the P3 is probably a bit easier to source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thiez