Revisiting some "old" ideas from 1970's - IPS, OPS

Here is what exactly matches my board in servo area.
 

Attachments

  • symasui-servo thimios.JPG
    symasui-servo thimios.JPG
    146.7 KB · Views: 354
Last edited:
Idle current

Hi,
I have a simple question about (your) output stages.
For the future I'am planning a 3 way activ speaker system.
And I want to estimate the idle current.

What is the idle current of a complimentarily pair bipolar transistors (e.g. NJW0281g/NJW0302g in the NS-OPS or slewmaster)
or mosfet complimentarily pair (e.g. IRFP240/IRFP9249 in VHEX+ in the slewmaster)?
Is there a difference if the current is adjusted optimal?
 
Hi,
I have a simple question about (your) output stages.
For the future I'am planning a 3 way activ speaker system.
And I want to estimate the idle current.

What is the idle current of a complimentarily pair bipolar transistors (e.g. NJW0281g/NJW0302g in the NS-OPS or slewmaster)
or mosfet complimentarily pair (e.g. IRFP240/IRFP9249 in VHEX+ in the slewmaster)?
Is there a difference if the current is adjusted optimal?

Hi Ampi,

Idle current depends not only on the output device type (BJT, MOSFET, etc.), but also on the nuances of particular topology.
I thought I gave you the answer in Post #1600. Did I? 🙂

Cheers,
Valery
 
Just a note; on my Symasui, the servo works just fine. The issue is that there is about 2v offset at turn on. Within about 4 or 5 seconds the servo corrects it and it drops to zero offset. I assume that Thimios is working on bringing the initial offset closer to zero so the servo doesn't have so much to correct. Is this right?
 
Just a note; on my Symasui, the servo works just fine. The issue is that there is about 2v offset at turn on. Within about 4 or 5 seconds the servo corrects it and it drops to zero offset. I assume that Thimios is working on bringing the initial offset closer to zero so the servo doesn't have so much to correct. Is this right?

Hi Terry,

In general - yes, however we observed certainly strange servo behavior, which is not related to any design issues - Pete's integrator is just fine. Thimios is trying to localize the root of the issue - in his case, servo's involvement leads to the offset increase, comparing to no-servo version...
 
It sounds like integrator itself starts with some noticeable offset, making the whole amplifier following its settling curve. As Thimios reported, the amplifier wth no servo behaves much easier, settling at 2.5mV offset practically right from the start.
Kind of odd.