Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)

Printing ST260, doing well until it crapped out after 3hrs. Will run it again.

I couldn't quite this figure out after reading the ATH manual and youtube searches.

What's the best way to create a mounting flange with ATH generated files?
 

Attachments

  • ST260-Tad2001.jpg
    ST260-Tad2001.jpg
    144 KB · Views: 490
I don't know if it's the best way but this is how I would do it:

1) Use this undocumented (yet) feature of Ath, which creates an *.afp file:

Code:
FusionRotaryProfile = {
  Thickness = 4 	    	; [mm]
  Flange.Radius = 50		; [mm]
  Flange.Length = 8		; [mm]
  Joint.Length = 0.35
  Joint.Radius = 0.6
}

2) Import the *.afp file into Autodesk Fusion 360 with the attached Add-In.

attachment.php



3) Make it solid by revolving it around the X axis and cut the holes...

attachment.php


4) Export as STL and print.

This all takes no more than about 2 minutes (not the printing part :)).
 

Attachments

  • AthProfileImport..PNG
    AthProfileImport..PNG
    34.1 KB · Views: 1,166
  • AthProfileImport-2.PNG
    AthProfileImport-2.PNG
    176.3 KB · Views: 1,151
  • AthProfileImport.zip
    1.4 KB · Views: 95
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I don't know if it's the best way but this is how I would do it:
1) Use this undocumented (yet) feature of Ath, which creates an *.afp file:
Code:
FusionRotaryProfile = {
  Thickness = 4 	    	; [mm]
  Flange.Radius = 50		; [mm]
  Flange.Length = 8		; [mm]
  Joint.Length = 0.35
  Joint.Radius = 0.6
}
2) Import the *.afp file into Autodesk Fusion 360 with the attached Add-In.
3) Make it solid by revolving it around the X axis and cut the holes...
4) Export as STL and print.
This all takes no more than about 2 minutes (not the printing part :)).

Wow Marcel this ATH Import is awesome, super easy to do. Thank You :worship:
 

Attachments

  • ATH-Tad2001.jpg
    ATH-Tad2001.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 164
I wish I started learning ATH sooner, better late than never.
I'm a newbie, not sure if this is all right.
Could you critique this and suggest room for improvements?
 

Attachments

  • demo8ctad2.png
    demo8ctad2.png
    116.5 KB · Views: 215
  • ATH-Tad2001.2.jpg
    ATH-Tad2001.2.jpg
    91.1 KB · Views: 225
  • demo8CTAD2.cfg.txt
    1.1 KB · Views: 80
When you design a horn for a specific driver as in this case, I think you should model its exit section as well. You already did it:

Throat.Ext.Length = 65 ; [mm]
Throat.Ext.Angle = 3.6 ; [deg]

- The directivity is maybe not as well controlled as I would like (may be too narrow for that size) but why not to try that. Otherwise it's fairly smooth. Printing is cheap...

I think you made a pretty good job for the start.
 
Last edited:
When you design a horn for a specific driver as in this case, I think you should model its exit section as well. You already did it:

Throat.Ext.Length = 65 ; [mm]
Throat.Ext.Angle = 3.6 ; [deg]

I think you made a pretty good job for the start.

I ran it again with the Throat.Ext settings. The throat impedance skyrockted up.
 

Attachments

  • ATH-Tad2001.3.jpg
    ATH-Tad2001.3.jpg
    152.6 KB · Views: 353
  • demo8ctad3.png
    demo8ctad3.png
    122.7 KB · Views: 356
This is something I can't really explain and am still a bit puzzled that the effect is so strong even in such a relatively smooth case (if the simulation is correct), but that may be due to the long exit section. It seems that this happens when two different geometries (expansion rates if you will) are connected together, which causes a reflection at the interface. Here it is the conical section and the OS-SE throat. Earl Geddes already commented on that here (#2391):

gedlee said:
I had always expected a reflection at a aperture where, even though the wall slopes are the same, the actual wavefronts are not - the coordinate systems are not the same at short distances, i.e. the throat. Hence, a reflection and wavy impedances.

This is why I switched from the DE250 to the DE500 - shorter throat extension.

Now it would be great to have this measued to see if it's real to that extent. If it was, the whole system would "ring", i.e. there would be strong peak(s) in the frequency response and accompanying ringing in the time domain. Correctable with EQ but somewhat troublesome. What's interesting is that it has virtually no effect on radiation pattern.
 
Last edited:
That makes a lot of sense.

If you look at commercial compression drivers, they're getting shallower and shallower and shallower.

Some of that is marketing, of course: if you can make everything shallower you can stick waveguides into in-wall speakers and the like.

But it stands to reason that some of it is because it sounds better.