The marriage

Greedy Boy Lego

1666656744270.png
 
Did you just Babelfish the M2 again?

View attachment 1102654

Except this time it's the Babelfish M2 OS (PoP version) with the M2 FE ... but it's a completely different amp (because it's missing the jfet buffer)

Cheers,
Stephen

it already happened to me in reality** - literally completing paper part of project of same amp , twice in 10 days

and when I realized it, comparison did show that I made it with irrelevant difference between original and next Groundhog Day

**mine is really tricky one; luckily I stopped fighting and being surprised;

choose:
 

Attachments

  • ZM special.jpg
    ZM special.jpg
    87.6 KB · Views: 73
  • SHRIKE.jpg
    SHRIKE.jpg
    164.1 KB · Views: 78
Yesterday I had a bit of spare time and put together the asc file for the boo to understand better how it works/performs.
First thing that I did was a thd sim and after that I did an output impedance sim.
For the output impedance I got a very high value. What I am doing wrong that I get this high value?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_1.jpg
    Screenshot_1.jpg
    598.1 KB · Views: 151
can't tell, don't care for Rout, because I know it is much lower than if you have source resistors

though, I believe ( if I interpret your formula properly) there is an error - you need to compute it as Rout = DeltaU/DeltaI

and for that sim, you can use just one phase/half, with 4R load as base

anyhow, with Cordell's 240/9240 models, I just got 0R13 per phase

double that for bridge - 0R26

means damping factor 8R/0R26=30

not bad for no-FB construction
 
you need to compute it as Rout = DeltaU/DeltaI
I do the calculation as you say: (V(o+)-V(o-))/I(V6).
V(o+) is the voltage at node o+ which is positive output
V(o-) is the voltage at node o- which is negative output
I(V6) is the current that goes through the voltage source that I use to measure the output impedance.

With 4r as base you mean having the load connected?

I still need to learn how to play with new models, it will be soon.

So into 4ohm I am getting something like 15df(4/0.26) with the boo and was getting 10(4/0.4) with the aleph j.
A very nice improvement that I felt from the first tracks that I listened.
 
no need for overcomplication

Case 1 - run sim for nominal load; read voltage across load, read current through load, write down both

Case 2 - run sim for (say) 50R as load; read voltage across load, read current through load, write down both

then Rout=DeltaU/DeltaI

where Delta is (Case1 - Case2)
 
This time I went for something more realistic.
I chosen 190hz because my speakers get to 3.4ohm at this frequency being 4ohm nominal. I did the measurements directly with the speaker as load.
The bias was 1amp.
To see if the thd profile changes I used 2 different line stages. Iron Pre was one which is UGT in the description of the photo, the other one is a bba3 and is named UGX in the description.
 

Attachments

  • ugx 1k 1w.jpg
    ugx 1k 1w.jpg
    248 KB · Views: 100
  • ugt 1k 1w.jpg
    ugt 1k 1w.jpg
    249.1 KB · Views: 95
  • ugx 190hz 1w.jpg
    ugx 190hz 1w.jpg
    254.8 KB · Views: 94
  • ugt 190hz 1w.jpg
    ugt 190hz 1w.jpg
    255.2 KB · Views: 91
Today I had a bit of courage and moved the small signal gnd.

I am still waiting for the isolator sheet and (for a week now )I am searching also for a used torque screwdriver. Not much to find around.
When doing it only with your hands, how can you know that you tighten enough? For 1nm you need to apply ~100g of force.
What happens if you over tighten ?
 

Attachments

  • 71BE92B0-FFEB-4F1D-ADFC-69715B2DB604.jpeg
    71BE92B0-FFEB-4F1D-ADFC-69715B2DB604.jpeg
    375.2 KB · Views: 93
  • 8F13363F-D194-4449-B554-BF7A936444DC.jpeg
    8F13363F-D194-4449-B554-BF7A936444DC.jpeg
    485.2 KB · Views: 88
  • 374E120C-79FA-4579-BC97-DB2CEC5DE018.jpeg
    374E120C-79FA-4579-BC97-DB2CEC5DE018.jpeg
    376.7 KB · Views: 93
  • BFDE1099-49B6-42FA-9B45-0C04ACCEAC51.jpeg
    BFDE1099-49B6-42FA-9B45-0C04ACCEAC51.jpeg
    589.2 KB · Views: 88
  • 952C1943-22A8-47E1-81FE-C042A478F2DA.jpeg
    952C1943-22A8-47E1-81FE-C042A478F2DA.jpeg
    346.1 KB · Views: 88
  • 0D34B2BA-9F1D-4AE5-9544-7854AC54C889.jpeg
    0D34B2BA-9F1D-4AE5-9544-7854AC54C889.jpeg
    547.5 KB · Views: 99
nice to have, but not necessary for DIY amount of work
I am more on this side. For now I don’t have so many amp pcbs to replace inside the enclosures so I will take my chances with a kitchen scale to make an idea how much force I need to apply.

Today when I searched for the oil(to make the threads in the holes) I found some rc bullet connectors.
The females could be soldered perpendicular to the pcb and the males on the wire giving a very simple way to replace the amp pcb.
For small currents 2mm is ok and for big currents 5mm. Never seen someone using them in an amp and I was thinking to solder a few on my pcbs to give them a try.
 

Attachments

  • EFD3AE54-3BF4-46C6-9523-3A8E8B7E49DE.jpeg
    EFD3AE54-3BF4-46C6-9523-3A8E8B7E49DE.jpeg
    519.7 KB · Views: 120
I am attaching the ffts for both front ends that I used in my previous test.
One of them is h2 dominant but the other one isn’t.
In the test I got the same thd profile for both.
Could it be that I used the irfp150 on the negative phase and this changes the things?
 

Attachments

  • 321CC4AD-AFE6-4EE7-A8C0-7C95C2750829.jpeg
    321CC4AD-AFE6-4EE7-A8C0-7C95C2750829.jpeg
    246.2 KB · Views: 100
  • 7CC969F2-3205-42A1-973F-981B578E55D7.jpeg
    7CC969F2-3205-42A1-973F-981B578E55D7.jpeg
    157.4 KB · Views: 94