Interesting - solving the usual class-B problems by maintaining high loop gain at high frequencies. Did you make any measurements pertaining to crossover distortion (e.g. thd at very low power)?
Looks like a member/paywall to that article. But this one is free, and sites the same author:
https://www.linearaudio.nl/sites/linearaudio.net/files/cherry ndfl.pdf
I hope it's OK to share this - I will remove it if it's not.
I created a list of all of the components in an Excel spreadsheet based on the schematic in the first post. If I have anything wrong, please advise and I'll update ASAP.
https://1drv.ms/x/s!AvzFj8fCrWcFgpEjywm3CmvUR7oY0Q?e=cHKx7z
Or here's a screenshot for people nervous about clicking a link from a forum newcomer 🙂
I created a list of all of the components in an Excel spreadsheet based on the schematic in the first post. If I have anything wrong, please advise and I'll update ASAP.
https://1drv.ms/x/s!AvzFj8fCrWcFgpEjywm3CmvUR7oY0Q?e=cHKx7z
Or here's a screenshot for people nervous about clicking a link from a forum newcomer 🙂
I'm feeling a bit mean here, but I'm noticing a rising distortion characteristic at higher frequencies for the 1W/3mA plot - more so than for the higher-power traces.
If this is indicative of crossover distortion, then a plot for 100mW could be very revealing.
As I say, I feel a bit mean because I think the work you've done here is really useful.
Yes, crossover distortion is present, what counts is the amount. What level would you satisfied ?
I can show you a simpler retro amp with very good performance, the DanWatt (class-b, current driven, designed by Danhard)
Attachments
Last edited:
Well, the fact that the increase in thd at 100mW is modest, relative to 1W, seems to me to show that crossover distortion is being controlled remarkably well. So I would have thought it completely inaudible for all programme material - by quite a margin.
I wasn't being critical, by the way - just interested in what seems to me to be one of the main reasons for wide open-loop bandwidth. Obviously, I wasn't expecting zero crossover distortion, as the hf feedback is there to reduce, not remove. Nevertheless, who needs those many exotic topologies if we have such a relatively straightforward solution?
On the other hand, we have verified directly coupled topologies with input differential pair that do not depend on bootstraps, output electrolytic capacitors and NFB hard fight with crossover distortion. I do not understand why to return to all those circuit issues that we were trying to avoid in designs after 1970. Nostalgy?
Maybe because very good VFM (Value for money) performance, simplicity and no need for hard available or exclusive components . And performance is very good. It is good to make things as simple as possible, IMO...
Well, if it measures well enough (in all areas of concern) and is relatively simple, cheap, and easy to source, then why not? By the way, I think output capacitors are a good thing, as they offer intrinsic protection of your expensive speakers. I have them at the output of my (dual-supply direct-coupled) amplifier regardless.
Having said that, the idea of extending the open-loop bandwidth can I'm sure be extended to some of the newer topologies - as appropriate.
Edit: Oops - just spotted your post, Elvee!
And, uncannily, I was intending to cite your good self as a designer of "some of the newer topologies"!
Edit: Oops - just spotted your post, Elvee!
And, uncannily, I was intending to cite your good self as a designer of "some of the newer topologies"!