With fullrangers, a lot depends on the amplifier, too. Most do not give their best with solid state, low DF amps. Try it with some tube amp, or some higher output impedance amp. (Pass F2 or similar).
I tried the Altronics years ago and they are cheap & nasty.
Well I think the Redback/Altronics driver is a lot more expressive and vivid in the midrange.There is a hint of the Goodmans Axiom 80 in their midrange.The SB has better bass for sure but I can't hear much appeal in the midrange.I put my vintage Alnico Fostex FE103 in the same box and that sounds a lot better to me.Midrange on them is pretty nice if a bit lacking in dynamics.
I will give the SB another try on the weekend. in a different room.This time with my Almarro valve amp.
That enclosure looks to be pretty right .I ordered SB20FRPC30-8 after reading this topic.
Now I have to decide between the DDVP-20 and this version of the Voigt Tapered Pipe enclosure.
Your experience would be helpful.
View attachment 1288399
That size will sound gorgeous .You will be able to follow the bass right down to where it concludes.Hi All,
I am trying to model this driver in WinISD with a QB3 alignment and am getting a 95L box with a 7.5cm diameter x 5.6cm long port. F3 is about 33Hz. Does all of this seem right? I am new to vented box design so would appreciate any feedback.
Many thanks!
I think 15litres is too small ,I have 34 l and would prefer around 28l just to tighten up the bass .I should add wooden blocks to lower the volume .Dunno, depends on what the drivers actually measure. Regardless, the way I figure stuff, the XO point would normally be ~349 Hz, though considering the under-damped alignments would opt for ~108 Hz (or 'close enough' THX LFE 120 Hz or ~195 Hz if doing passive due to component cost) to isolate the mid-bass and make the divided! box either 15 L each with the HF ~aperiodic and maybe experiment with the LF box taking up most of the space, though either way removes any LF influence on the HF with the XO trimming it even more as we're mainly concerned with getting the > 250 Hz BW 'squeaky' clean.
Can you give me the notch filter values ? thanks , also your enclosure volume is the perfect size for a sealed box .I tried these in a 2-way with Peerless DX25BG60-04 (crossed ~1.8k). But also added a switch to cut the wideband over to another set of terminals with baffle step and a notch to pad down the upper midrange a bit. Allows me to try both 2-way and FR. The 2-way can handle more technical stuff, but the 8" by itself makes more simple music quite spooky (in a good way). In fact I enjoy how it can take a track that is a bit too harsh (IE a "hot" mic that picks up alot of sibilance) and make it more listenable without losing perceived detail.
View attachment 1188808
In-room response of the 8" by itself with the BSC and notch (~3k-6k). The notch only drops a few DB to leave enough on the table off-axis to play with toe-in. Easy enough to alter anyway by swapping out a resistor on the notch.
View attachment 1188810
Enclosure is ~32liter. A design I came up with to use a single 2ftx4ft sheet per enclosure. Rear ported with a set of 2" precision port flares butted up to make about 4" estimated length. Nothing special about the bass, not amazing, but not bad. I find it adequate to provide an anchor to the music for the midrange to shine.
I had mine for about 8 months and have never been conscious or aware of beaming .I’m pretty tempted to get a pair of the SB full range drivers but was wondering what the beaming is like. Could anyone pass on their subjective findings?
I did have a pair of the Fane 12” wide range drivers but found the sweet spot was very tight.
Cheers,
SS
SB20 FRPC are a little bit too hot on axis if you don't do any filtering, but it sounds perfect 15 to 20 degrees of axis. In smaller room (15 m2) I liked it more on axis because it had more bass....in bigger room (40 m2) it sounded lighter and balance was better of axis...
It can't cope with the very best tweeters but it has really nice and extended sound, Maybe the best fullranger which I heard and I'm not really fan of most of fullrangers, especially not of those too small...
Absolutely nothing comes close for price of 50 euros/bucks...
My plan is to make 2.5 way BR tower of approx 80 liters with two of SB20FRPCs and maybe Monacor DT300 in waveguide for real 94dBWm 4 ohm speaker...
It can't cope with the very best tweeters but it has really nice and extended sound, Maybe the best fullranger which I heard and I'm not really fan of most of fullrangers, especially not of those too small...
Absolutely nothing comes close for price of 50 euros/bucks...
My plan is to make 2.5 way BR tower of approx 80 liters with two of SB20FRPCs and maybe Monacor DT300 in waveguide for real 94dBWm 4 ohm speaker...
Attachments
As with most FR drivers, these have a rising response. Combined with the baffle step, yes, that would make them sound far from optimal.I ordered a pair and put put them in a 35 litre well braced plywood box with 2 inch diameter vent 3.5 inches long as recommended on the Madisound site to give F3 of 45Hz.
They sound pretty terrible.
If you measure and add a proper baffle step compensation to them, I'm sure you will like them a lot better.
Adding baffle step and /or notch filters/zoebels networks etc to them sort of defeats the purpose.You might as well just make a multi way using drivers better suited to specific frequency range.
I understand the appeal of wide range type drivers but suspect the good aspects of their sound has very little to do with their wide/full range and much more to do with the type of construction of the drivers including things like using highish efficiency ,short excursion,light paper cones ,lowish power handling , low moving mass and alnico magnets.
I have some circa 1965 Aurex Toshiba SS 30 speakers that are three ways that use those sorts of drivers.They have a similar type of sound to the best full range drivers I have heard except they are better.Much better.They go lower because they use a 9 inch woofer and passive radiator,a dedicated 4 inch midrange and the treble is better because they use a small bullet tweeter rather than a cone or wizzer.Incredible sounding speakers really.
I understand the appeal of wide range type drivers but suspect the good aspects of their sound has very little to do with their wide/full range and much more to do with the type of construction of the drivers including things like using highish efficiency ,short excursion,light paper cones ,lowish power handling , low moving mass and alnico magnets.
I have some circa 1965 Aurex Toshiba SS 30 speakers that are three ways that use those sorts of drivers.They have a similar type of sound to the best full range drivers I have heard except they are better.Much better.They go lower because they use a 9 inch woofer and passive radiator,a dedicated 4 inch midrange and the treble is better because they use a small bullet tweeter rather than a cone or wizzer.Incredible sounding speakers really.
Sorry to be blunt but I think this is the wrong thread for you.
Here we are discussing the possible uses of a specific full range driver.
Not full range vs multi way.
If you insist on talking about your topics maybe start a new thread. Who knows, it may attract even more interest.
Here we are discussing the possible uses of a specific full range driver.
Not full range vs multi way.
If you insist on talking about your topics maybe start a new thread. Who knows, it may attract even more interest.
This thread is what motivated me to waste money and time on those specific drivers.Within that context I think a dissenting opinion might add some balance to the discussion and might make others more cautious before doing the same thing.
No it definitely doesn't, the sound from a 8 inch full range will still be completely different.Adding baffle step and /or notch filters/zoebels networks etc to them sort of defeats the purpose
Things like directivity as well as distortion characteristics are very different compared to a multi-way system.
Some people enjoy that sound and there is nothing wrong with that.
You can't blame other people for wasting your money.
You're still responsible for your own actions.
Besides, I have seen distortion measurements of these woofers, and they perform extremely well.
Especially for their price.
If you don't like them full range, there is nothing stopping you from using them as a woofer in a multi-way system.
I suspect the problem is that in an attempt to get bass extension they have allowed for too much excursion .Which is not typical of the breed and means the wizzer cone is moving a lot .Which probably accounts for the dirty/resonant sort of sound.I guess if you limited excursion by modifying the suspension or cutting off the bass below say 70 hz it could sound better.
Doppler distortion is rarely a limiting factor, it would also definitely show up in the distortion measurements.
The SB are relatively high-efficient, at 1 or 2mm excursion you're already well with proper listening levels.
A whizzer cone is also only responsible for the top-end, we are talking 8kHz and up.
That is most definitely not going to ruin the entire experience, but changing a bit of nuance at most.
Reading from the other speakers you like that are much more vintage, I personally think that you are either not used to the transparency that lower distortion gives or you just simply don't like that sound.
Which is totally fine in either case!
But it can sound different that's for sure.
Assuming that freq resp of both are the same as well (which they probably aren't)
The SB are relatively high-efficient, at 1 or 2mm excursion you're already well with proper listening levels.
A whizzer cone is also only responsible for the top-end, we are talking 8kHz and up.
That is most definitely not going to ruin the entire experience, but changing a bit of nuance at most.
Reading from the other speakers you like that are much more vintage, I personally think that you are either not used to the transparency that lower distortion gives or you just simply don't like that sound.
Which is totally fine in either case!
But it can sound different that's for sure.
Assuming that freq resp of both are the same as well (which they probably aren't)
Cone breakup then.There are plenty of two ways with that too of course but it usually less obvious because it is at least partially attenuated by the crossover.
Yes , using the Sb with a crossover and a tweeter is a serious way to reduce the upper range brightness ,and will be my next project .No it definitely doesn't, the sound from a 8 inch full range will still be completely different.
Things like directivity as well as distortion characteristics are very different compared to a multi-way system.
Some people enjoy that sound and there is nothing wrong with that.
You can't blame other people for wasting your money.
You're still responsible for your own actions.
Besides, I have seen distortion measurements of these woofers, and they perform extremely well.
Especially for their price.
If you don't like them full range, there is nothing stopping you from using them as a woofer in a multi-way system.
@jtgofish
only to be sure:
did you experiment with the box?
Balance between bass and mids can be influenced by more or less damping and lower tuning of the reflex port.
did you ever try a current driven amplifier?
its the holy grail for fullrange drivers
for my part I always treat the paper cone with metal foils what adds resolution
here a thread i started on it
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/how-to-make-a-loudspeaker-sandwich-cone.402917/
only to be sure:
did you experiment with the box?
Balance between bass and mids can be influenced by more or less damping and lower tuning of the reflex port.
did you ever try a current driven amplifier?
its the holy grail for fullrange drivers
for my part I always treat the paper cone with metal foils what adds resolution
here a thread i started on it
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/how-to-make-a-loudspeaker-sandwich-cone.402917/
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- SB Acoustics SB20FRPC30-8 (8" Fullrange Cheap Monster II)