Revisiting some "old" ideas from 1970's - IPS, OPS

Hi Terry,

If you increase C7 value from 2.2pF to 10pF - that will eliminate the overshoot.

Cheers,
Valery

10p added an over shoot to the top.
 

Attachments

  • Parallel LT 10p.jpg
    Parallel LT 10p.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 545
OK I changed it to 22p. They are a bit rounded now. I don't have time take pictures right now. I will try 15p next and see how that looks later when I get home. I'll post pics then. I'll get a shot of it clipping too.

Hi Terry!

Ok, we're almost there.
What you can also do for the best performance:
- Increase R5, R12 from 22R to 47R (this will "calm down" the LTP a little bit);
- Add 220pF capacitor in parallel with R15 (18K);
- After that play with C7 value - I believe, 15p is about the optimal one.

Many thanks,
Valery
 
Terry - one more thing, if you don't mind.

Remove C7, R14 and place the network C21, R32, R35 instead.
I have marked all the amendments on the picture attached with red frames.

In the end you can play with C21 value for the best square wave at the output.

Cheers,
Valery
 

Attachments

  • 02-Parallel-LT-Sch-01.jpg
    02-Parallel-LT-Sch-01.jpg
    208.9 KB · Views: 541
Terry - one more thing, if you don't mind.

Remove C7, R14 and place the network C21, R32, R35 instead.
I have marked all the amendments on the picture attached with red frames.

In the end you can play with C21 value for the best square wave at the output.

Cheers,
Valery

Hi Valery,

Sorry, I've been lazy today. Sitting around watching the Olympics I have recorded. 😱

I made the changes you suggested. I actually think the square waves are a little more rounded then they were with just the 22p. I said I would show it clipping but the gain must be low because I can only get the output to 20Vac and that is not enough to make it clip. My sine wave generator only produces 1.5Vac. Here are some scope shots of some square waves.
 

Attachments

  • F8 1khz 15p.jpg
    F8 1khz 15p.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 472
  • F8 10khz 15p.jpg
    F8 10khz 15p.jpg
    50.8 KB · Views: 462
  • F8 20khz 15p.jpg
    F8 20khz 15p.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 456
  • F8 50khz 15p.jpg
    F8 50khz 15p.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 157
Hi Valery.

I only played music through it for a couple of minutes just to make sure I wasn't hearing anything that shouldn't be there. Like I said, it is very low gain. I wanted to get this channel working at its best before I rework the second channel. Then I will but them both through my good speakers and give it a closer listen.
 
I will measure again in the morning. I know i put 1.5vac in and measured 22vac out. I will recheck everything. I have a stand alone CDrom that I use for quick testing. I had it up full and it wasn't very loud so I know what I'm measuring is likely true. I will compare it to the other channel as well. That one is unmodified. I'll get back to you.
 
OK I have all the values changed to the values in post #1005. Attached are some scope shots. One issue is the offset. The trimmer is at its limit and I still have 6mV on one channel and 30mv on the other. I did match hfe on all 4 of the LTP transistors.
 

Attachments

  • Parallel LT clipping.jpg
    Parallel LT clipping.jpg
    47.1 KB · Views: 130
  • Parallel LT 100khz.jpg
    Parallel LT 100khz.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 368
  • Parallel LT 50khz.jpg
    Parallel LT 50khz.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 360
  • Parallel LT 20khz.jpg
    Parallel LT 20khz.jpg
    45.7 KB · Views: 371
  • Parallel LT 10khz.jpg
    Parallel LT 10khz.jpg
    48.7 KB · Views: 367
  • Parallel LT 1khz.jpg
    Parallel LT 1khz.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 378
An early test

Waiting for the heatshink package i had tried an early test.
Nothing special,just i can't resist giving a first listening test.
Excellent sound,deep bass,fine treble very musical....just Excellent!
It is the first time that listening test take place first, before scopes and the measurements!
 

Attachments

  • DSC00212.jpg
    DSC00212.jpg
    361.5 KB · Views: 260
  • DSC00214.jpg
    DSC00214.jpg
    331.9 KB · Views: 653
  • DSC00215.jpg
    DSC00215.jpg
    322.1 KB · Views: 192
Last edited: