If you feed the inputs both to one long-tailed-pair you'd have much higher common-mode impedance and fewer input devices contributing noise I think.Idea for a balanced passive Phonostage.
I have not calculated it. For me this is a hybrid Intrumentation Amplifier. With discrete input transisors i see the main advantage in low voltage noise. As far as i can tell the better this input transisors are matched and thermo coupled, the better CMRR will be. Plus precission resistors .
An integrated INA does not get better then around 1nVqHz.
This one can be as low as 0,2nVqH with the right transistors and relatively high idle, say 20mA per pair.
An integrated INA does not get better then around 1nVqHz.
This one can be as low as 0,2nVqH with the right transistors and relatively high idle, say 20mA per pair.
i do not really understand. Could you make a simple drawing of this ?
Something like this maybe?
The feedback goes to the emitters via a filter network (Z1 and Z2), then the outputs proceed to further balanced passive filtering and diff amp?
Then you have only one transistors' worth of noise for each input rather than two, I believe. Wasn't sure what loading you are going for.
For balanced in-out, I find Scott's more interesting :
A simplified universal differential or single ended phono preamp
Patrick
A simplified universal differential or single ended phono preamp
Patrick
RIAA can also be setup this way :
(Re post 11314) No.
RCruz said:.. In my sim the voltage reference in the opamps uninventing inputs must be set to -1v otherwise the circuit oscillates.
This is re post 11309. No, the circuit does not work with dc condition like this.