Just another lateral FET amp

Disabled Account
Joined 2010
Increasing the emitter degeneration resistors of the LTP from 0 to 100R speeds up recovery from clipping - at the expense of reduced loop gain.
There is no free lunch...
 

Attachments

  • latFETamp_2019_08_14_clipping_100kHz_Re_100R.png
    latFETamp_2019_08_14_clipping_100kHz_Re_100R.png
    87.7 KB · Views: 408
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
Shutting down the soldering iron and back to LTSpice. Luckily this overshoot appeared in the simulation as well. After fiddling at different locations it turned out that an additional capacitor of 3n3 between both emitters of the input differential pair was the solution. Presumably this gives some additional phase boost to the loop thus reducing loop overshoot.
But the verification of this promising patch was delayed by some heavy trouble shooting: While increasing the gain of the scope I discovered substantial noise that finally could be triggered - the frequency was close to 200MHz! The strange thing was that I could not discover high voltage excursions anywhere in the amp. But with a simple H-field sniffer there were circulating currents found in the vicinity of the pcb. Finally the source was located in the area of the gate drive circuitry and the beast could be tamed parallelling a 47~100pF to the CE-terminals of the PNP gate driver.
 

Attachments

  • LatFETamp_2019_08_15_osc_200MHz_Re_100R_39p_3n3.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_15_osc_200MHz_Re_100R_39p_3n3.png
    44.7 KB · Views: 326
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
After this annoying episode the modifications could be verified successfully. The screenshots depict 100kHz square response into 10R dummy load at 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50Vpp output level.
 

Attachments

  • LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_50Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_50Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    29.8 KB · Views: 66
  • LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_40Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_40Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    27.9 KB · Views: 66
  • LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_30Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_30Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    29.4 KB · Views: 60
  • LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_20Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_20Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    27.7 KB · Views: 69
  • LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_10Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_15_100kHz_10Vpp_10R_load_Re_100R_39p_3n3_100p_10R.png
    29.5 KB · Views: 316
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
And back again to ARTA and STEPS. This distortion spectrum was measured at 17Vrms output into 10R dummy, just 1dB below the onset of clipping. THD is at the limit of my test equipment. And despite the simple unregulated power supply there is very little hum which indicates a superior supply rejection.
 

Attachments

  • NosFETamp_2019_08_15_1kHz_spectre_10R_17Vrms.png
    NosFETamp_2019_08_15_1kHz_spectre_10R_17Vrms.png
    47.5 KB · Views: 100
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
The next plots show THD versus output voltage at 1k/6kHz respectively. The abrupt transition from THD sweetspot into hard clipping is typical for an amplifier with a very high loop gain.
 

Attachments

  • NosFETamp_2019_08_15_1kHz_THD_10R.png
    NosFETamp_2019_08_15_1kHz_THD_10R.png
    35.9 KB · Views: 101
  • NosFETamp_2019_08_15_6kHz_THD_10R.png
    NosFETamp_2019_08_15_6kHz_THD_10R.png
    35.8 KB · Views: 83
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
Noise performance measurements were a bit too optimistic because in the meantime I had swapped differential pair emitter degeneration resistors from 0R to 100R. This degrades noise performance slightly. But at first I had to struggle with 50Hz hum around -75dBV with input shorted (potentiometer set to min). Replacing the 2u2 Wima input coupling cap by a 100u/16V elelectrolytic solved this problem. The plot shows output noise measured at left channel. The right channel unused serves for comparision with the soundcards intrinsic noise floor.
 

Attachments

  • LatFETamp_2019_08_15_output_noise_C_poti_min.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_15_output_noise_C_poti_min.png
    41.5 KB · Views: 352
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
So I did some fine-tuning of the wiring. The power-MOSFET sources summing node was relocated to the other pair of TO-3 fixing screws thus increasing the distance to the input stage. This further improved harmonic distortion as can be seen by the latest plot of 1kHz, 15Vrms into 10 Ohms.
 

Attachments

  • LatFETamp_2019_08_17_1kHz_spectrum_10R_15Vrms.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_17_1kHz_spectrum_10R_15Vrms.png
    47.6 KB · Views: 335
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
The photographs depict actual wiring of source summing node, PE to AGND connection and general wiring
 

Attachments

  • 2019_08_17_amp.jpg
    2019_08_17_amp.jpg
    125.5 KB · Views: 152
  • 2019_08_17_wiring_2.jpg
    2019_08_17_wiring_2.jpg
    194.9 KB · Views: 159
  • 2019_08_17_wiring_1.jpg
    2019_08_17_wiring_1.jpg
    184 KB · Views: 159
  • 2019_08_17_source_node_rear_2.jpg
    2019_08_17_source_node_rear_2.jpg
    178.9 KB · Views: 163
  • 2019_08_17_source_node_rear_1.jpg
    2019_08_17_source_node_rear_1.jpg
    183.8 KB · Views: 312
  • 2019_08_17_PE.jpg
    2019_08_17_PE.jpg
    169.9 KB · Views: 329
Disabled Account
Joined 2010
To evaluate THD vs frequency I used ARTA/STEPS. It turned out that measurements beyond 20kHz do not work with my soundcard, even at a sampling rates of 192kHz. The anti-aliasing filters are not switched accordingly so I measured with the sample rate of 44.1kHz upto 20kHz. The graph on top is the signal level, normalized to about 0 dB. The harmonics "D2" and "D3" appear in the region of -100~120dB and increase slowly with higher frequencies.
 

Attachments

  • LatFETamp_2019_08_20_H1H2H3_10Vrms_10R.png
    LatFETamp_2019_08_20_H1H2H3_10Vrms_10R.png
    44.8 KB · Views: 106