Do you have any results from using the LL1692A? I'm wondering if it is better than the choke loaded coupling.
No, I don't have tested this transformer yet and I am not sure to make a test on this in the future.
I am still waiting the last Bartolucci interstage (3 serie) and OPT.
I am still waiting the last Bartolucci interstage (3 serie) and OPT.
This evening the first test using the GM70 Graphite like diode in the configuration of the attached image.
1000v without the GM70
940v with the GM70 like diode
Until now I don't see problems.
I remember this:
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/VTPS_solutions.png
1000v without the GM70
940v with the GM70 like diode
Until now I don't see problems.
I remember this:
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/VTPS_solutions.png
Attachments
audiodesign said:This evening the first test using the GM70 Graphite like diode in the configuration of the attached image.
1000v without the GM70
940v with the GM70 like diode
Until now I don't see problems.
I remember this:
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/VTPS_solutions.png
Here we go again.


Did you know that if you takle a bar of gold bullion, mill it out and install an axe handle, you can actually use it to pound in fenceposts?!!!!!

Nuff said.
This evening the first test using the 6D22S like diode in the configuration as previous PS design with GM70.
1000v without the 6D22S
972v with the 6D22S like diode without output resistors
Until now I don't see problems, probably I will add an output resistor to reduce current peaks
I remember this:
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Cla...S_solutions.png
1000v without the 6D22S
972v with the 6D22S like diode without output resistors
Until now I don't see problems, probably I will add an output resistor to reduce current peaks
I remember this:
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Cla...S_solutions.png
The main idea to use 6HV5A to drive a 845 is of ANSA
He mantain an italian forum and a website on
http://ansaht.altervista.org/
He mantain an italian forum and a website on
http://ansaht.altervista.org/
Power Supply sonic perfomance test, 1 is the best
1) dual 6D22S after the solid state diodes bridge
2) no vacuum tube diode after the solid state diodes bridge
3) single GM70 after to the solid state diodes bridge
with the GM70 the sound is too smooth, with 2 x 6D22S the sound since to be more natural
In dual mono configuration will be necessary only one 6D22S per each channel
1) dual 6D22S after the solid state diodes bridge
2) no vacuum tube diode after the solid state diodes bridge
3) single GM70 after to the solid state diodes bridge
with the GM70 the sound is too smooth, with 2 x 6D22S the sound since to be more natural
In dual mono configuration will be necessary only one 6D22S per each channel
audiodesign said:Power Supply sonic perfomance test, 1 is the best
1) dual 6D22S after the solid state diodes bridge
In dual mono configuration will be necessary only one 6D22S per each channel
That recalls me an amp made by a good guy in Russia, Shalin, and built by a couple of friends on his specs including the transformers
here the full circuit
I never ever understood why one should use a vacuum diode after a full SS bridge. Would a mixed bridge (SS+tube) be "better"?
The mixed configuration can give the same sound with less tubes
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/VTPS_solutions.png
I cannot understand in the schematic sent the meaning of the 10MK after the solid state bridge and before the 6d22s.
---
One note: the difference on sound of combination 1 and 2 are very little and probably it is possible get the same result with the 1 adding a resistor before the first cap
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/VTPS_solutions.png
I cannot understand in the schematic sent the meaning of the 10MK after the solid state bridge and before the 6d22s.
---
One note: the difference on sound of combination 1 and 2 are very little and probably it is possible get the same result with the 1 adding a resistor before the first cap
I cannot understand in the schematic sent the meaning of the 10MK after the solid state bridge and before the 6d22s.
[/B]
That's a cap. 10uF. Russian.
yes, but using a capacitor in this position the power supply change and this is not a hybrid rectification .
first test with Bartolucci output transformer 115BN
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/test_ver2a.html
Frequency response is limited in both case by the interstage
Soon sonic performances test and comparation
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/test_ver2a.html
Frequency response is limited in both case by the interstage
Soon sonic performances test and comparation
Bartolucci are developping a new interstage for this project with a larger high frequency band and I should receive a first sample to test this week
Tango vs Bartolucci
Yesterday evening with two my friends with a lot of experience in music reproduction has been started the first section of a sonic performances to compare the Tango to Bartolucci.
Using the same interstage INT8C (second release) I have changed the output transformer Tango X10S with Bartolucci 115BN.
Test evironment:
- Rega Planar 3
- Cartridge SUMIKO BLUE POINT EVO III
- My Pre Phono End
- SYNCHESTRA Reference interconnect cables
- SYNCHESTRA SIGNATURE Speaker Cable
- Martin Logan AERIUS modified
The 845 two stage amp. was with the solid stade rectifier and 1100V 70mA bias.
It is very difficult decide which is the best of this two reference transformens but the Bartolucci seen to be more neutral.
The Tango is a little bit smooth.
In a previuos test with all Tango transf. (NC-20 and X10S) the sound was completely too smooth so unacceptable.
Yesterday evening with two my friends with a lot of experience in music reproduction has been started the first section of a sonic performances to compare the Tango to Bartolucci.
Using the same interstage INT8C (second release) I have changed the output transformer Tango X10S with Bartolucci 115BN.
Test evironment:
- Rega Planar 3
- Cartridge SUMIKO BLUE POINT EVO III
- My Pre Phono End
- SYNCHESTRA Reference interconnect cables
- SYNCHESTRA SIGNATURE Speaker Cable
- Martin Logan AERIUS modified
The 845 two stage amp. was with the solid stade rectifier and 1100V 70mA bias.
It is very difficult decide which is the best of this two reference transformens but the Bartolucci seen to be more neutral.
The Tango is a little bit smooth.
In a previuos test with all Tango transf. (NC-20 and X10S) the sound was completely too smooth so unacceptable.
Yesterday I have published the final test about the GM70 amplifier
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/GM70amp.html
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Claudio845/GM70amp.html
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Hi-end 845 with only two stage