Excited to hear your impressions regarding the Stasis amp when you get it wrapped up.
Bone cancer has dropped me off a cliff.I can still lift heavy things with relative ease
If that was you, Pass' point model? At BurningAmp You are Superman!
Zen products?SissySit and Stasis.
Stasis is old-school Nelson, from the Threshold era.
Yes, SissySit is a Mighty ZenMod amp.
Yes, SissySit is a Mighty ZenMod amp.
I will go to Zen's and look around to see if there are any specs. I assume Stasis boards won't be available.Stasis is old-school Nelson, from the Threshold era.
Yes, SissySit is a Mighty ZenMod amp.
Thanks...
Everything is available. The more advanced the project, the more you have to dig.
But nothing is hidden.
But nothing is hidden.
Finding it true. If boards are not available it will stop me. As there are too many amps in que. With same amount of speakers to build.the more you have to dig.
What is the maximum dissipation we would dare to push a single (TO-247) device? (assuming "perfect" mounting and ample heatsink)but current capability of "just" one pair per side, somewhat meeh
don't use force, use a bigger hammer
I agree.
I can still lift heavy things with relative ease, the next fun amps will be SissySit and Stasis.
I've spec'd the aluminum deluxe chassis.... the 4U SissySIT feels pretty light. Even the 5U, with handles front and back LOOK heavy but are actually rather light.
Surprisingly, the steel Rawson chassis are heavier, yet more compact.
I ran my Aleph J Zen in a 5U for two years @ 46 watts per device. Keratherm and torqued @ 0.9nm as per the mighty ones recipe. No issues, ran like a dream but of course hot. My BA-3 is biased a bit higher, dissipating around 125 watts per channel / 0A9/21watts per device in a 5U. I like it hot. The BA-3 really excels with more Iq, imo/ime. The front end especially has a lot of extra potential given more Iq, imo/e (off topic but wth).What is the maximum dissipation we would dare to push a single (TO-247) device? (assuming "perfect" mounting and ample heatsink)
No surprise there. 6L6 «lifts» aeroplanes on a daily basisI can still lift heavy things with relative ease

@ 0.9nm as per the mighty ones recipe.
Mighty Pa's
I recommend a nice wide washer on top.
The TO247 case has good support at the hole, and you
just want to avoid cranking down too hard. We use
torque wrenches set at 8 inch-pounds.
The 150s should be at 1.1 Nm, but I like 1.2 to really make them sing. Forget Iq... it's the mounting torque. 
Those puny ones can be at 0.9; they can't handle the pressure.
Salt to taste for your favorite recipe.

Those puny ones can be at 0.9; they can't handle the pressure.
Salt to taste for your favorite recipe.

as long it's controlled, no big difference and both 0.9 and 1.1Nm are good
though, with Keratherm (squishy, case leaning) 0.9 is my choice, with mica you can go 1.1
though, with Keratherm (squishy, case leaning) 0.9 is my choice, with mica you can go 1.1
For clarity... I was just poking fun. Hope that was clear with theas long it's controlled, no big difference and both 0.9 and 1.1Nm are good
though, with Keratherm (squishy, case leaning) 0.9 is my choice, with mica you can go 1.1


Me... I am finely calibrated to a skosh over finger tight. Works well.
Me... I am finely calibrated to a skosh over finger tight. Works well.
As long as you remember to use a split washer between the screw and the fender washer, that’s going to be a decent torque amount. There is a lot of thermal expansion/contraction in the mosfets as they heat and cool, and the split washer is very important to keeping everything attached properly.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F5m kit