Yeah the CRAM, see 1 fold is maybe ok for HT as you don't mind a 6' or 7' tower cab, but for PA not practical to load unload from a truck.
I'm not sure if I am following you guys but i have not seen you posted a 3 or 4 fold TH on this thread, just TL pipes.
The issue with the forum is making me miss posts or answer when there is some more answers already.
So you guys did not liked BP1 sim? It hit more than 140 with 4 cabinets.
Dual skar 12.
Now in the other hand if there is a 18 or 21 driver than cost 300usd and do same or better, that is an option , my budget is 300 max for drivers per cab.
So right now 2 skars ddx12 are around 300
I want to hit 140 with 4 cabs if posible.
Love when people say ...
wow where are the other subs hidden??
None..just what you see
Just 2 boxes.....
nahh where are the other boxes
😂
I'm not sure if I am following you guys but i have not seen you posted a 3 or 4 fold TH on this thread, just TL pipes.
The issue with the forum is making me miss posts or answer when there is some more answers already.
So you guys did not liked BP1 sim? It hit more than 140 with 4 cabinets.
Dual skar 12.
Now in the other hand if there is a 18 or 21 driver than cost 300usd and do same or better, that is an option , my budget is 300 max for drivers per cab.
So right now 2 skars ddx12 are around 300
I want to hit 140 with 4 cabs if posible.
Love when people say ...
wow where are the other subs hidden??
None..just what you see
Just 2 boxes.....
nahh where are the other boxes
😂
Last edited:
?? Both our TTL/TH can be multiple folded, though with no stepped piping, mine is easier to multi-fold.
Yeah, these 'missing' posts keep messing me up too! Really frustrating.
I've made no judgment of BP1's design; I mean his latest is just one of trading BW for a bit more peak SPL in a given max Vb, hence the need to go bigger to go lower at its present power rating; ergo obviously mine being smaller, yet having the wider BW means making more boxes to get the desired peak power, so only real gain is less 'back breaking' work (healthier long term*), but longer to set up/tear down and less power required.
Again though, 'we' weren't trying to meet your performance goals, just trying to educate a bit, but no, my alignment requires (8) ~150 L cabs @ 600 W/2pi to 'loaf' along at 140+ dB/m.
* I speak from sad experience even though using the appropriate, back, etc., custom fitted supports/harnesses and now in retirement I must wear them just to be able to walk with a cane, so caveat emptor.
Yeah, these 'missing' posts keep messing me up too! Really frustrating.
I've made no judgment of BP1's design; I mean his latest is just one of trading BW for a bit more peak SPL in a given max Vb, hence the need to go bigger to go lower at its present power rating; ergo obviously mine being smaller, yet having the wider BW means making more boxes to get the desired peak power, so only real gain is less 'back breaking' work (healthier long term*), but longer to set up/tear down and less power required.
Again though, 'we' weren't trying to meet your performance goals, just trying to educate a bit, but no, my alignment requires (8) ~150 L cabs @ 600 W/2pi to 'loaf' along at 140+ dB/m.
* I speak from sad experience even though using the appropriate, back, etc., custom fitted supports/harnesses and now in retirement I must wear them just to be able to walk with a cane, so caveat emptor.
Hi BP,
Could you please advise what version or product number of Hornresp was used to produce the screen shown in the attachment.
Thanks,
David
Attachments
What does GM think about the high compression ratio And air velocity in 335 cm2 by chance? (I’m just curious, as ive run the ~same design at 400/1600cm2 and played it at ‘wide open throttle‘ often in a vehicle and it was intense!). Each ddx12 had its own pioneer 9701 amp and a lithium bank
Last edited:
Correct, the same as in your Post #83.
I am trying to establish if it is a current bug, or one that has been fixed. I cannot replicate the problem myself using the latest release.
