DIYA store "Wolverine" (Son of Badger) .... suggestions ??

Here is the deal ....

The EF3 is proven.

The Wolverine is the simple default amp. I would build it (if it was the only option). If it was not simple , some would not.
Look at the majority of forum designs , the simple ones get built.
Look at Pass , single semi's.

But , to please even a more diverse group .... the open ended nature
of the interface will fill that need. (I want "spooky") 😀 .

OK , FINAL (below) D8 zener/ or R5 option. Q5 GONE.
PCB reflects these changes.

I'm going to do one more check to see if the devices/holes conform to
UMS specs and submit it.

OS

OS
 

Attachments

  • DIYAampWolverineFINAL.jpg
    DIYAampWolverineFINAL.jpg
    289.8 KB · Views: 732
  • DIYAampWolverineFINALsprint.jpg
    DIYAampWolverineFINALsprint.jpg
    678.2 KB · Views: 804
The EF3 is proven.



The Wolverine is the simple default amp. I would build it (if it was the only option). If it was not simple , some would not.

Look at the majority of forum designs , the simple ones get built.

Look at Pass , single semi's.



But , to please even a more diverse group .... the open ended nature

of the interface will fill that need. (I want "spooky") 😀 .



OK , FINAL (below) D8 zener/ or R5 option. Q5 GONE.

PCB reflects these changes.



I'm going to do one more check to see if the devices/holes conform to

UMS specs and submit it.



OS



OS
All good OS,
Thanks for putting forward what you think is best after considering all options. Can you post a sprint layout file to so I can help with the final check?
 
The EF3 is proven.

The Wolverine is the simple default amp. I would build it (if it was the only option). If it was not simple , some would not.
Look at the majority of forum designs , the simple ones get built.
Look at Pass , single semi's.

But , to please even a more diverse group .... the open ended nature
of the interface will fill that need. (I want "spooky") 😀 .

OK , FINAL (below) D8 zener/ or R5 option. Q5 GONE.
PCB reflects these changes.

I'm going to do one more check to see if the devices/holes conform to
UMS specs and submit it.

OS

OS
Thank you Os,
so this is the final version of wolverine.
what value for R5 (option)?
 
can I say something? please don't kill me xD



the IPS board holes is a bit off that can be fix is just
micro adjustments I would change the grid to 0.25mm
then I would then make the outline snap to grid after

that is done then I re-adjust the IPS PCB outline to a

solid number is now 120 mm x 50 mm also what is

need it to do is re-adjust all holes of the PCB so they be
exactly 180 degree in Sprint Layout 6 is actually "0" Angle: 0°

one way to do it is be placing a silkscreen circle with a 6.50 mm
diameter close to the edge of the IPS silkscreen then use the

circle as a grid make sure that automatic capture is on,

ok so far after adjust PCB outline to the 0.25 mm grid I
was able to adjusted to 120 mm x 50 mm nice, ok so now
the distance between the holes for the M3 standoff have
a distance of 56.750 mm long side and wide is 43.500 mm
oh yes and you can even go fancy with the rounded corners
too lol I attached the file ST so you guys can see what I mean


edited: is fine the middle hole top 🙂
 

Attachments

  • DIYWolverine IPS board.zip
    DIYWolverine IPS board.zip
    162 KB · Views: 151
  • 56.750 mm.JPG
    56.750 mm.JPG
    110.9 KB · Views: 401
  • 43.500 mm.JPG
    43.500 mm.JPG
    128.8 KB · Views: 404
  • IPS board 120 mm x 50 mm.JPG
    IPS board 120 mm x 50 mm.JPG
    131.3 KB · Views: 192
Last edited:
can I say something? please don't kill me xD



the IPS board holes is a bit off that can be fix is just
micro adjustments I would change the grid to 0.25mm
then I would then make the outline snap to grid after

that is done then I re-adjust the IPS PCB outline to a

solid number is now 120 mm x 50 mm also what is

need it to do is re-adjust all holes of the PCB so they be
exactly 180 degree in Sprint Layout 6 is actually "0" Angle: 0°

one way to do it is be placing a silkscreen circle with a 6.50 mm
diameter close to the edge of the IPS silkscreen then use the

circle as a grid make sure that automatic capture is on,

ok so far after adjust PCB outline to the 0.25 mm grid I
was able to adjusted to 120 mm x 50 mm nice, ok so now
the distance between the holes for the M3 standoff have
a distance of 56.750 mm long side and wide is 43.500 mm
oh yes and you can even go fancy with the rounded corners
too lol I attached the file ST so you guys can see what I mean


edited: is fine the middle hole top 🙂

Vargas , only a 1 row SIP on a 3rd party IPS board.

OS
 
Hi OS.


I was Talking to Harry and he suggested moving the input cap C1 away from the output stage. So I had ago at doing that.


What are your thoughts?

# 1 . I took both your idea and Vargas's and integrated them.
C1 is split for us that use normal input caps and is verticle.
Offset has better access , holes with rings are aligned 55mm apart.
This is IPS standard - we have to get this right.
PS - you triggered me , Stuart ... you check it !!
OS
 

Attachments

  • IPS.jpg
    IPS.jpg
    297.8 KB · Views: 349
Not sure but this kind of information is useful to me:

I'm compiling a text with the raw data on the optimal components that I
have based my layout on.

NO special unobtanium devices OR values - all standard ... only about 10
values in the whole amp's 52 resistors.

For example , the D8/R5 option .... https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/427/tzxserie-1767901.pdf Very low noise.

Or the "Spooky" IPS red led's - https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/678/AV02-1562EN_DS_HLMP-x15x_2018-07-23-1827993.pdf
1.6Vf just like my model...

OS