Death of Gain Clone

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Upupa Epops said:
2.32 A for 8 W.... really amazing.... :D Why not 5 A, superbiased superclass A quadrat ? :D
Yes, I thought about that option. But might be a bit too complicated ;)

This little amp would consume like 60 Watt to produce 8 Watt.
Could it try to match Nelson Pass First Watt amplifiers?

He uses like 100 Watt to produce 10 Watt output.
:cool:
 
A decade ago I did a SE mosfet based amp using a 6SL7 as voltage amp.

It was two stage, with four mosfets per channel. Power supply was 50V, 3A with 22mF-20mH-22mF. Current amp was a P type mosfet with NPN bipolar in CFP hybrid, and current sink was an LED referenced N type. Dissipation was 150W per channel, power was 28W, with 1dB at 15Hz, 75KHz. Output stage distortion was 0.06%, all H2/3. The tube was probably at around 2-3%, since it was a simple plate loaded triode. Zout was 38 milliohms. Energy wastage was horrific. I still feel guilty when I switch it on.

I called it the Glass Harmony, and the interface between the tube and the output stage consumed 18 months of intense R&D. It remains secret. The Glass Harmony sounds like 100 watts up to its limits; grip is very impressive, even with a composite 2000uF coupling cap. Those who have watched my journey over the last decade say it's still the best amp I've done; I don't know, I think the AKSA is better overall because it's more resolving, greater slam and impact, and much more efficient. But I still use it for comparison with all my tube hybrids these days.

When you want it to sound like a tube, you really have to use a tube. Funny, that.

Cheers,

Hugh
 
Luke,

There's IP in there I don't really want to share in a kit.

Secondly, boards are a complete failure as a business model.

Thirdly, 400 volts are involved which is dangerous in a kit, and potentially litigious.

Fourthly, the four heatsinks required weigh no less than 11 Kgs. This is VERY costly for air freight!

Lastly, who would even consider 1 x 28W with 300W dissipation in a world where efficiency is becoming ever more important?

However, if you have reasons why it should be done, let's hear 'em! Heck, I might be dead wrong!

Cheers,

Hugh
 
lumanauw said:
I don't understand the theoritical process of "Current Dumping", why it needs 4 component bridge (I think this should work without 120pF+4.5uH, but don't know about the stability without these 2 components), but as I see it, the finals (911-922) works like a "switch"... turnon-turnoff depending the drop at the 47ohm

Read the pdf lionked further up in the thread, it explains things. Intuitively, you can also look at it like this: when the output stage switches off (since it works in class B), there would normally be a 'notch' in the output - but keep in mind that the inductor would tend to keep the output current constant - in order to do so, voltage across it will change, moving the now relatively high impedance coupled emitters node of the current dumper 'acrosss' the class B gap.
 
Hi, Ilimzn,

Read the pdf lionked further up in the thread, it explains things. Intuitively, you can also look at it like this: when the output stage switches off (since it works in class B), there would normally be a 'notch' in the output - but keep in mind that the inductor would tend to keep the output current constant - in order to do so, voltage across it will change, moving the now relatively high impedance coupled emitters node of the current dumper 'acrosss' the class B gap.

You are right, thanks for the explenation :D
What about the 120pf, what is the main function of this? For stability or for balancing the 4 bridge leg?
 
lumanauw said:
Hi, Ilimzn,
You are right, thanks for the explenation :D
What about the 120pf, what is the main function of this? For stability or for balancing the 4 bridge leg?

It's bridge balancing. Again, intuitively, it prevents the NFB loop seeing the discontinuity due to sudden gm change and not correcting propperly - this is precisely how the bridge nulls out the nonlinearity - in order for this to work, you must have the L and C components.
 
Hi Hugh,

I can understand your reasons, but im being selfish of course:)

I dont leave my amps on all the time, so an hours listening a couple of times a week is not a big deal to me. And I have started using the train to do m bit:)
I doubt Electricity consumers are the reason for the polar caps melting anyway.

seeya Arthur
 
so you removed 3.300uF//4.7uF blocking cap in feedback

did anything happen?
with offset or else

I guess not, as we have JFET input pair


Even if had been bipolar input pair
I doubt block cap would do much good or be needed.
Not when feedback resistance is as low as here, 500/27 Ohm.
 
carlosfm said:
I have a chip power amp on my main system (chock, horror), and it sounds much better to me than many so-called 'high-end' amps, and you can bring some Krells.
If you call my amp a 'GC' I'll smackah u face. (c) Jocko :D

Chip Amp (doesn't matter wich one) and High-Fidelity are quite different concepts :devilr:
If you're not able to sense the differencies....:bigeyes: :bigeyes: :bigeyes:
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.