CFH7 Amp

Yesterday evening i do some soldering job.....i need to order son missing parts

Marc
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20161120_001704_resized_20161120_125236514.jpg
    IMG_20161120_001704_resized_20161120_125236514.jpg
    514.4 KB · Views: 549
I begin to collect parts from my stock......I don't think i will need the an : each heatsink mesure 200x165x80mm. I have matched IRFP pairs, and hfe matched BC556/546 as KSA1381 KSC3503.
Ide, remember that a fan works better if it is set up to push air into a restriction and has a clear intake side.
It does not work as well when it sucks, becaue the restriction on the input interferes with the flows and pressures.

When the fan is working hard, it does not matter if it blows horizontally into a sink or vertically.
But when you turn it down to be quiet it does make a difference. Fan at the bottom blowing up through a vertical sink acting as a chimney works better than blowing downwards or sucking downwards or working horizontally.
You can even turn the fan off and the chimney effect alone can give some cooling.
 
Ah the Grashof number...

It's interesting how many commercial forced convection products use the "suck" mode, that is, the fan is on the back blowing out, sucking air through the heatsink tunnels or the boxes. The sucking method will provide more uniform cooling of all things inside the box if air inlets are situated appropriately to draw a laminar flow past the heated objects. Whereas a fan blowing into the box will be turbulent and then circulate inside and re-heat rather than exiting after heated once. On some PA amps and high power computer rack servers there is a set of fans that blow and another that sucks but flow is straight down a narrow 1U rack.
 
fan blowing into a sink tunnel will probably result in turbulent air flow.
Turbulent air flow cools better than laminar air flow.
Passive cooling using the chimney draw will probably be laminar air flow.

It's the difference between turbulent cooling of a fast air flow and the laminar slow air flow of a chimney that makes the BIG difference in the cooling capacity of a fanned sink cf. a passive sink.
 
fan blowing into a sink tunnel will probably result in turbulent air flow.
Turbulent air flow cools better than laminar air flow.
Passive cooling using the chimney draw will probably be laminar air flow.

It's the difference between turbulent cooling of a fast air flow and the laminar slow air flow of a chimney that makes the BIG difference in the cooling capacity of a fanned sink cf. a passive sink.

I agree completely.

It's just on say, a PC case where there is no tunnel, blowing air in causes it to mix around and leak out and there will be a residence time for the heated (warm) air before it exits. Maybe same happening with sucking but I think there is less recirculation of warm air.

In any event, a fan blowing by a heatsink is like 100x more effective than natural convection and heatsinks can be made much smaller and cost less.