2023 Musical Fidelity A1

Flat on the bottom sucking fresh air from below through large enough slots creating overpressure in the device and therefor blowing out hot air through ventilation slots at the back and those at the sides. Probably a non perfect way but at least (...)
correct 👍

Unfortunately, this is not a real hi-fi solution and requires considerable modification work on the housing; then you might as well do it properly - everyone knows what that means -> DIY.
 
It is however a real useful life prolonging method and not too hard to implement. I do such stuff a lot with hot devices except that I prefer passive methods normally, very rewarding. Metal work is Zen for the soul.

There simply is no way to implement correct heatsinking without disturbing its landmark appearance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio
Often written but repeated: I had one for repair when I noticed DC at the outputs and a very hot cap. I understood this was not OK and when I wanted to pull the plug in a reflex one of the caps exploded and was launched too close to my head. Its traject was against the ceiling. Room littered with foil and paper. That was the moment I decided to refuse repairing these anymore.
 
If anyone thinks that installing a low-noise fan is the solution, they are mistaken, because how is the laminar flow (necessary for the A1) to be generated?
Agreed, the heat dissipation inside a case by means of one or more fans requires in my view a more scientific and not approximate approach.

In my opinion inside the A1 case the fan would be without a doubt too small and therefore with too little air flow to demonstrate any effectiveness.
And in any case, no more than one would fit and in that case it should have an extractive flow in my opinion.
But it should also have a quantity of slots sufficient to feed the air flow of the fan and to let fresh air into the amplifier.

https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/babysitter-for-papas-koan.186554/page-6

As said, it is not something that can be done in an approximate way, if one wants to obtain noteworthy results.

https://www.neweggbusiness.com/smartbuyer/over-easy/pc-cooling-how-to-set-up-computer-case-fans/

At that point, a large external fan blowing cool air onto the boiling "heat sink" would be more rational (however, it wouldn't be my choice anyway), also because the larger the diameter of a fan, the smaller the noise it generates for the same air flow.
 
Post #100: 60 x 60, 70 x 70 or 80 x 80? Larger is better. Sunon maglev is good. BTW 1 fan is a necessary evil, adding 2 fans is SM. Some therefor prefer non class A as excess heat, high energy consumption, shorter lifetime and now the need to add fans all really are a nuisance except when one likes the sound of air flow over music while checking the energy bill. An external fan is in my strong opinion a dealbreaker making the A1 a non desired device.

Changing that chassis is done in 2 hours max. provided that the PCB has no tracks at that spot.
 
Last edited:
Post #100: 60 x 60, 70 x 70 or 80 x 80? Larger is better. Sunon maglev is good. BTW 1 fan is a necessary evil, adding 2 fans is SM. Some therefor prefer non class A as excess heat, high energy consumption, shorter lifetime and now the need to add fans all really are a nuisance except when one likes the sound of air flow over music while checking the energy bill. An external fan is in my strong opinion a dealbreaker making the A1 a non desired device.

Mine was obviously a hypothetical example, I would never even dream of putting a small fan inside the case of an A1 (just because I'm absolutely convinced that it would be completely useless), let alone two! 😉

Changing that chassis is done in 2 hours max. provided that the PCB has no tracks at that spot.
So, should I buy an integrated amplifier like A1 and then take on the burden of changing the case, making all the necessary openings, calculating and searching for and finding the right heat sinks, redoing all the connections and who knows what else?
I don't agree, even though someone on this thread posted an admirable example of this in two separate mono cases (if I saw correctly).

But, after all that changes, will all that magic sound will remain like the original?
No, not for me.
 
This is my hobby with cheap Chinese devices. Solve design errors, mitigate heat issues, weed out fake parts, improve power supplies, prolong lifetime. Real Zen.

Not with 1599 Euro devices that still smell new. It can be done in case someone is as stubborn.
 
No space to glue 4 standoffs to the vast space on the upper side of the PCB? No space to add a bracket to the side?

Think in solutions.
 

Attachments

  • E7C8F52E-A840-4FC3-AD45-805EC90CE2F5.JPG
    E7C8F52E-A840-4FC3-AD45-805EC90CE2F5.JPG
    52 KB · Views: 80
  • IMG_7072.jpg
    IMG_7072.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 63
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio
The magical sound is a peculiarity of the rather strange circuit of the Tim de Paravincini design.

Actually, no EE would come up with the idea of building a power amp like this.
May be, but I said something else.

I was simply wondering if after doing all that described above in order to replace the current insipid case of an A1 there was then the risk of causing some deterioration to the original sound.
Generally speaking I'm for respecting the integrity of the design and usually I focus my modifications on what can be improved without probably altering the final SQ.

Since, except for a few cases, I find it rather presumptuous to pretend to improve something that a designer has created and of which I already like the resulting sound.
Very often I have seen the exact opposite happen.
 
Very often I have seen design errors based on assumptions, human error or neglect that could be solved in minutes by just thinking of a better solution. I have also seen such in medical devices and professional high power environments. Worse are correctly designed devices implemented in a wrong way or adapted to a wrong assumption. I liked the situation where a large UPS was connected with its output to solar panels. Here it was assumed by consultants with impressive egos, suits and diplomas that the existing UPS was able to feed back energy to the mains 😀

If the device sounds best by having a too short life and becoming too hot and me accepting that then I would doubt myself, not the product. Many that follow "names", brands or made up reputations like to think that these are some superintelligent extremely gifted talents or even genius but truth is we all make mistakes and thinking errors. This particular device is, just like its predecessor, full of mistakes whether is it designed by Kanye West or someone from a slum.

In my professional projects I always ask complete laymen and/or "other skilled" persons for input. It is surprising how many good ideas can come from those that are not supposed to know.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio
It seems that the temperatures reached inside the case will easily make the pot (gear) go beyond the limits imposed by its design as from Alps spec.
In other words, it simply seems yet another bad choice by the designer(s), or a consequence of it (that's the overheating). 😉

View attachment 1338014
thats is what you can buy ....you know that big boys can have a custom part ??
if is fault unit ask for new ones quite simple
 
it is your idea as you DO NOT know the pot used nor if is alps , btw 70° on datasheet you posted the amp work at 60° quite normal for classA in summer
for 1500€ you can't have more be happy tha you can buy the MF is great amp
please a fan isn't a rocket science
 
Last edited: