Babelfish XA252 / Babelfish XA252 SIT / Babelfish XA252 SET

believe me - autorouting just makes things harder

say that you finely arrange parts ..... run autoroute

then spend zillion of hours editing things, to optimize what needs optimizing

it's faster with brainrouting

now, main thing with drawing pcb is start ....... easier if you have predetermined pcb dims, as I sorta embraced Papa's FW format ( even if edited after)

if not, I'm just lettin' my brain to wander ........ great fun!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mikerodrig27
Let's make it on topic for a quick statement. I tried adjusting the BFR from 22 to 470. The amp sounds really cool this way. I like it both ways. I have little female terminal posts in the BFR position so I can change the BFR around for a bit. I may play with this for a while assuming the contacts do not get crusty.

Okay back off topic:

I tried KiCad and had trouble with the library. I spent some time with it and kind of just gave up. As a last ditch effort I switched to EasyEDA which is really been quite spectacular for starting out. The library is very complete. I really have not found any limits as far as my use.

I have eagle on my computer which I need to start playing with at some point. That has auto routing as well. I would assume that Kicad has it.

The auto routing does not get it perfect. You can set the perimeters as far as how wide the traces are, how long the traces are allowed to be the clearances etc.
 
I find everything difficult when doing a layout. The traces are always too fat, there is never a handy resistor to jump a trace, it’s to cramped, it’s a massive puzzle… Then I copy most of someone else’s as they have thought about it already. You then need to triple check everything at least twice. Make footprints as the defaults are not quite good enough.

After all that you are not happy so you start again from scratch a couple of times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botte
pretty much yes

note - first batch of pcbs gone out with footprint for 3pcs of 3W resistors in each rail
later pcbs gone out with 5pcs of 3W resistors in each rail

so, in first case , use 3pcs of 0R33/3W
in second case you can use that or 5pcs of 0R56/3W

power of resistors not critical, as reason for change, just to allow me to choose, depending which ones I can get in quantity in particular moment in space and time
 
per channel:

Donut 250VA (or more), 2 secondaries of 28Vac each , so using one bridge per secondary arrangement, having established GND after bridges

that resulting in 35Vdc rails under load, Iq anything from 1A5 to 2A, depending what your heatsinks can cope with

cap bank; CRC per rail , 22mF - 0R1/5W - 22mF , where 22mF is minimum

for 35Vdc rails, 40Vdc caps, or higher
 
  • Like
Reactions: samoloko
IMG_0646 2.JPG
IMG_0645D.JPG
 
Same here, I was going straight to SIT (51’s) mode but have since changed my mind. Mosfet mode will now get the initial run. But, to make changes easier I’ll drill and tap heatsinks for the THF-51’s at the same time as the rest of the machine work.