Why don't people build more coaxial systems?

This type of mountainrange fq-response is typically a big turn-off for diy builders, especially for non DSP folks. Even a ‘normal’ plate amp like a Hypex with its limited PEQ:s won’t really make this palatable. The “flying squirrel” filter needed for a smooth handover from cone to cd, the drooping response of the 18”, the break up close to the passband of the cone drive, all are sort of the opposite of f.i. a Purify/Dome driver setup.
 

Attachments

  • C11941C7-70B6-4210-95B4-5CDC18459BB7.jpeg
    C11941C7-70B6-4210-95B4-5CDC18459BB7.jpeg
    113.5 KB · Views: 145
Mabats ATH4 and Augerpro's waveguide simulations have reached advanced levels. It might be an idea to focus on optimization of diy mini-waveguide+compact tweeter combo's that would be suitable to be built into existing (mid-)woofers. Member 5th Element did that with B&W mids.
Many years ago I did some crude attemps, but without optimizing the first section (a la KEF) , results around 8-10 kHz are far from optimal. Then the cone termination is next....
 
Mabats ATH4 and Augerpro's waveguide simulations have reached advanced levels. It might be an idea to focus on optimization of diy mini-waveguide+compact tweeter combo's that would be suitable to be built into existing (mid-)woofers. Member 5th Element did that with B&W mids.
Many years ago I did some crude attemps, but without optimizing the first section (a la KEF) , results around 8-10 kHz are far from optimal. Then the cone termination is next....

not just a Kevlar B&W, a paper cone 5” Satori, and a 6” metal cone SB Acoustics driver. He’s cracked the code for sure. @5th element

Good times ahead without needing a large MEH. (not that there’s anything wrong with that)

Watch this space!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: krivium
It is much like tube amps and folks that like vintage drivers.
Which often comes to mind when coaxial is mentioned.
Sometimes there is a romance with them. Aesthetically
and historical value.
1680781602921.png
Otherwise many modern drivers are more live sound
so the high efficiency is attractive. maybe more challenging
crossover.

Far as mounting another driver in front of another.
I see the space saving property the advantage.
Or just something fun to do.

Have thought of using a sealed back driver for the application.
which would allow foam or felt to be mounted to the back
to reduce diffraction.

Having seen " beam blockers" for pro audio.
Mounting another driver seems to be a fancy
beam blocker. So depending on the application
and crossover points. I seen the front mounted
driver a issue, and then not really a issue.
Depending on what you actually hear, or what people
" think" they hear

Deemed not common in some aspects.
but incredible common in car audio.
Being car door is a horrible baffle.
And listening position horrible.
Having heard rather glorious audio
in cars.

Tend not to overthink, and with DIY
you can build what you want
 
Mabats ATH4 and Augerpro's waveguide simulations have reached advanced levels. It might be an idea to focus on optimization of diy mini-waveguide+compact tweeter combo's that would be suitable to be built into existing (mid-)woofers. Member 5th Element did that with B&W mids.
Many years ago I did some crude attemps, but without optimizing the first section (a la KEF) , results around 8-10 kHz are far from optimal. Then the cone termination is next....

Yep just do it yourself!
 

Attachments

  • FST1.jpg
    FST1.jpg
    103.2 KB · Views: 229
  • FST2.jpg
    FST2.jpg
    168.9 KB · Views: 243
I number of people asked me about the applicable patents and info about the KEF coaxial design:

Stiffening ribs to push up first breakup frequency:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/c0/cb/5e/d0dc2981970841/US8942407.pdf

This describes the phase plug on the tweeter:
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...hase-Plug-and-Novel-Rigid-Body-Diaphragms.pdf

Surrounds:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/d5/95/30/9f2dcabbd76047/US9271082.pdf

you can probably find more with searches for Jack Oclee-Brown and Mark Dodd, : GPACOUSTICS (UK) LIMITED,
 
  • Like
Reactions: indianajo
What coaxials do people have experience with?..
I've used the Dayton Audio CX120-8 and the Omnes Audio CX 3.1. Both have dome tweeters rather than compression drivers like pro coaxials often use. Both have some response irregularities, which are unavoidable when mounting a tweeter in the middle of a non-ideal cone shape, but they aren't too bad, and both sound pretty good to me.