I
I have the lm833-N, is it right?The AD825 is a very hi speed device and requires care in its application and use. I assume you used an adapter board and two AD825's as they are single opamps.
I've always rated the TL0 series very highly and still do. The LM833 is another good device but one that is available in two versions, the original LM833-N from TI and also a TI version with a quasi complementary output stage called LM833.
This might sound heretical / old-fashioned / retrograde, here goes: with proper bypassing the NE5532 works just fine for 90% of use cases. We're talking 22 to 47 ohm resistor on each rail, followed by about 220 uF electrolytics in parallel with 3 to 10 uF X7R ceramics before pins 4 and 8 [1]. I do run into small clicks when following a Khozmo switched attenuator elsewhere in the preamp, probably due to input bias, so my next trick will be an OPA2134 or other FET input opamp after the control.
[1] A post on reasons why will happen eventually. Wayne Colburn demonstrated this topology to great effect in the WHAMMY, sans ceramics, and the results speak for themselves.
[1] A post on reasons why will happen eventually. Wayne Colburn demonstrated this topology to great effect in the WHAMMY, sans ceramics, and the results speak for themselves.
Only the Texas Instruments (TI) version is available with the Quasi stage.
If it is Texas brand it is the old version. Any old stock National Semiconductor versions are all the non Quasi type.
This is the reply I received many years ago from TI.
This is the Quasi:
This is the original:
I have the lm833-N, is it right?
If it is Texas brand it is the old version. Any old stock National Semiconductor versions are all the non Quasi type.
This is the reply I received many years ago from TI.
LM833-N is an op-amp originally from National Semiconductor. NS named this device as LM833. As for the package, LM833N means a PDIP package LM833-N. NS calls PDIP package as “N” package.
TI developed another LM833 as 2nd source device and named it LM833. When TI made LM833, TI changed its output stage to NPN type from VPNP.
After TI acquired NS, TI renamed NS’s LM833 to LM833-N in order to differentiate the LM833-N from TI’s LM833. Please don’t be confused by LM833-N and LM833N.
This is the Quasi:
This is the original:
Attachments
Thanks Mooly.
I have the LM833N/NOPB
original. The acronym 833N is printed on the operational amplifier.
Is this the right one for the Whammy?
I have the LM833N/NOPB
original. The acronym 833N is printed on the operational amplifier.
Is this the right one for the Whammy?
NOPB simply means no lead (lead free). Either type will work and the original was still very highly regarded. LM833N was the original NPN/PNP outputs stage.
This is something I posted a few years ago. Original vs Quasi LM833 driving a 100 ohm load. Scope on 5v/div. The WHAMMY won't come close to needing this drive ability.
This is something I posted a few years ago. Original vs Quasi LM833 driving a 100 ohm load. Scope on 5v/div. The WHAMMY won't come close to needing this drive ability.
@Jaccher , Muses 02 opamp sounds really good. It does not oscillate but needs 68pF compensation to get the sqares right.
When I did the Whammy, I ran out of OPA1656, so I couldn't determine if it oscillates and if I need some compensation for that opamp. That should be a good option as well, however, you never know without trying.
When I did the Whammy, I ran out of OPA1656, so I couldn't determine if it oscillates and if I need some compensation for that opamp. That should be a good option as well, however, you never know without trying.
Now I have some opamps to try.
I think it will be about listening pleasure.
Every operational amp shines in something and loses in another.
I think it will be about listening pleasure.
Every operational amp shines in something and loses in another.
If you like TL072, then Muses 02 is the right choice for you + some quality 68pF (2pcs) for step response compensation. And the OPA2604 has that sound character too, but it sounds better than the TL072 or OPA2134. It's something in between, and doesn't need compensation. OPA2604 is an obsolete opamp. Max. voltage supply for Muses 02 is +-16V DC.
Last edited:
HI NIXIE 62.
I don't want to go over budget and I believe that the race for the best performing operational could become a frustrating and expensive adventure.
The old TL072 gives pleasant listening, I hope it's enough for me.
I don't want to go over budget and I believe that the race for the best performing operational could become a frustrating and expensive adventure.
The old TL072 gives pleasant listening, I hope it's enough for me.
If you don't want to exceed your budget, then try only OPA2604 if you can find an original chip. It's a small buck, and definitely better than the TL072.
Beware the OPA2604 (yes it is excellent and (was) one of my favourites) but it is out of production and any at seemingly reasonable prices will likely be fake.
Yes, procurement is problematic. I have them from long ago, when there were no copies, only BB. The OPA 2134 is like a replacement for the OPA2604, but that OPA never sounded good to me, not even close to the 2604.
PS
I bought a few used OPA2604 on ebay, DIP8 in ceramic case as well as SOIC 8 SMD version. I can't find any difference from the old originals in the DIP8 plastic case. Neither by measuring nor listening.
I have a new plastic fake OPA2604, purchased at a local store. It works of course but it sounds just like a TL072, and there is probably some kind of TL072 inside.
PS
I bought a few used OPA2604 on ebay, DIP8 in ceramic case as well as SOIC 8 SMD version. I can't find any difference from the old originals in the DIP8 plastic case. Neither by measuring nor listening.
I have a new plastic fake OPA2604, purchased at a local store. It works of course but it sounds just like a TL072, and there is probably some kind of TL072 inside.
Last edited:
I would have thought any fakes were more than likely something like a 4558 tbh.
A check of the supply current is the first basic check to see if something is fake followed by a quick look at its bandwidth and then whether it seems to be a FET or bjt input. Also look at its output current capability. A 2604 will fully drive 600 ohm loads while a T072 will fall well short of doing that.
A check of the supply current is the first basic check to see if something is fake followed by a quick look at its bandwidth and then whether it seems to be a FET or bjt input. Also look at its output current capability. A 2604 will fully drive 600 ohm loads while a T072 will fall well short of doing that.
Who knows what they put in those copies? Anyway, I used fake NE5532, TL072 and OPA2604 in DC protection, DC servo and voltage regulators for non-audio purposes. Not a single one has died so far. For audio, they are not good at all, they sound bad. I mostly use them for rehearsals when I'm making something. If everything is fine, I put more expensive opamps. I still have to try the OPA1656, I'm sure it sounds better than the 2604, but the question is whether it oscillates and needs compensation in Whammy circuit.
Try this one, 5-6$ on adapter SOIC/DIP8. These adapters are great, the connections are very short. I use them a lot. Seller 99,5% positive.If one day I get a real 2604 I will definitely try it.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/393266327926
Try it, it's cheap. If seller doesn't lie that they were removed from old devices, then they are original.
Check the DC offset before connecting the headphones, it should be small 1-2mV. Also, measure the DC offset when you turn off the amp. Measure for a longer time and you will see what happens.
Check the DC offset before connecting the headphones, it should be small 1-2mV. Also, measure the DC offset when you turn off the amp. Measure for a longer time and you will see what happens.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- "WHAMMY" Pass DIY headphone amp guide