Warmth Of The Sound - WOTS

I am in the process of replacing all my solid state preamps with tube pre. Since it gives more pleasing sound to me.
My dad just did that with a system I helped him put together. At first I was put back a bit, but remembered that it was he who had the tube systems when I was young, probably the very reason I have an interest in all this…
 
I do have F4 in one of the systems. Great buffer. However, when i tried some solid states preamps recommended, like ba3fa, alpha20, jc2, sound was analytical, and sharp with my 4way dome based speakers.
JC2 was the least offensive, that is, softer than other preamps i tried.
Whammy is great, clean and precise, ACP+ even better. As headphone amp or pre.
However, it was when i used musical fidelity tube headphone amp, first version, modified, power supply upgraded, with 6N6 tubes, i got the sound i exactly wanted.
Pure highs, crystal clear bells, musical mids, voices standing out, each instrument easy to follow. Certain recordings gave me chills down the spine, even made me tear up.
Rarely clean sterile solid state pre can do that.

When you go out eat with your friends, do you select food based of the elemental analysis or taste?

I had/have many highly regarded top of the line ss preamps. Onkyo, Sanyo Plus, PS audio, Nikko, Parasound, NAD. Not the sound i am after.
 
Exactly why I would try the WOTS LeGrand or WOTS TRE to drive the F4, it may be less sterile...
But I need at least 10Vpp to match my 96dB speakers

Isnt the ACP+ a kind of low power J2 ? Musicality comes from SE topology?!
Merry Christmas to all
 
Exactly why I would try the WOTS LeGrand or WOTS TRE to drive the F4, it may be less sterile...
But I need at least 10Vpp to match my 96dB speakers

Isnt the ACP+ a kind of low power J2 ? Musicality comes from SE topology?!
Merry Christmas to all
I'm late, just could grab a computer, I'm out for vacation. Both WOTS are 20db preamplifiers, not designed to drive a buffer, the gain would be too low. I didn't measure their output voltage swing, I can only imagine that it could reach at least Vpp=1/4Vb without any problem.
 
Last edited:
Fun fact, leonardo never finished mona lisa painting. It was never meant as portrait for her. He carried this painting with him for decades, and worked on it over and over. Without ever seeing her. This was one of few paintings he had with him when he died.
Accuracy was never the goal for him. Certain feeling, expression of which he tried to capture.
Thats what i meant.

When i listen to dvorak or tchaikovski, i am looking to attain the same feeling the composer intended. Accuracy is not a goal.

You can missinterpret my words anyway you like, what do i care.
 
Last edited:
I am in the process of replacing all my solid state preamps with tube pre. Since it gives more pleasing sound to me. Yes, some call it effect boxes. Whatever. Point is what pleases you most.
Solid state pre, no matter how clean and sterile is still an effect box.
Some say pre has no role if we do not need amplification before the power amp. In my experiments passive pre sounds flat and boring. It does not drive anything properly. Buffered pot is the way to go.
Or tube pre. My secret is to put one more...long post sorry.
No. If a device changes the sound its an effects box, a properly designed pre amp does not change the sound, except for level. Your tube pres add distortion, and just because you like distortion dosnt mean it sounds better to others. Some people don't want to look at the world thru rose colored glasses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey
No. If a device changes the sound its an effects box, a properly designed pre amp does not change the sound, except for level. Your tube pres add distortion, and just because you like distortion dosnt mean it sounds better to others. Some people don't want to look at the world thru rose colored glasses.
Rose colored glasses, that is original
Unlike two parrots before about putting shades on mona lisa
 
People used to listen on cylider of vax with distortion exceeding tens of percent.
People used am radios with limited high frequencies.
People used to listen to tiny poor fullrange without box.
No one was appalled.
Who says they were not appalled?
SPECIALLY people who regularly listened to live Music!!!!

They accepted it only for the novelty value and, o0 course, there was nothing else!!!!

But their ears bled because of the screechiness and distortion.

So much so, that for decades "Tone" control meant murdering high frequencies. (hint: scratchiness and distortion).
 
Who says they were not appalled?
SPECIALLY people who regularly listened to live Music!!!!

They accepted it only for the novelty value and, o0 course, there was nothing else!!!!

But their ears bled because of the screechiness and distortion.

So much so, that for decades "Tone" control meant murdering high frequencies. (hint: scratchiness and distortion).
Have you researched the early days of recording?