US Naval pilots "We see UFO everyday for at least a couple of years"

I'm just saying there have been some good hoaxes.
 

Attachments

  • RaptureHeliumBlowUpDolls,.jpg
    RaptureHeliumBlowUpDolls,.jpg
    71.7 KB · Views: 253
All UFO'd out yet?
Weary of the stories and supposed hoaxes?


Back in July 1969, at the ripe old age of 16, I was laying in my bed, awake around 1 AM, sweating, due to it being a hot summer night.
The cheap table fan was humming across the room, on a table by the window, it was the only breeze, since I didn't have an air conditioner until later on, when I started working at ITE Imperial Corp and got paychecks.😀


So I lay there, trying to doze off, and suddenly I hear this high-pitched whistle sound, you know, like the subtle non directional yet annoying sound of a TV set's HV flyback transformer.


I thought it was the table fan needing oil, so I got out of bed and shut it off, intending to go down in the basement to get some oil for it.
Only, once the fan stopped, the whistle kept going.


I looked out the bedroom window, and there was this globe-like thing hovering motionless about 100 feet away right over old man Allen's rooftop.
No lights, no movement, it was like it was frozen there, about 10 feet above his roof.
I estimate it was around 8 or 10 feet in diameter, and a dark greyish color.


I watched it for a minute or so, then went to my parents bedroom to get mom, I wanted her to see this thing.
I woke her up, and she whispered not to wake up dad, since he was drunk and she didn't want him waking up and tormenting everybody.
She told me to go back to bed, and refused to budge.


So I go back to my room, and this thing's still out there, with that whistle going on, for about 20 more minutes...
I sat mezmerized on a chair by the window, watching it.
Then, suddenly, it shot straight up in the sky, dissapearing in the blink of an eye, and that whistle stopped too, like turning off a light switch.


I'll never forget that night as long as I live.
Next morning, mom was making us all breakfast, and she says to me "What was so important last night that you had to wake me up?"
I told her, and she laughed, my friends that I told were amused too, so I basically stopped telling the story of this incident. 🙁
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: indianajo
...I'll never forget that night as long as I live.
Next morning, mom was making us all breakfast, and she says to me "What was so important last night that you had to wake me up?"
I told her, and she laughed, my friends that I told were amused too, so I basically stopped telling the story of this incident. 🙁

Well told anecdotal report. I suspect that more regular people than we realize have had similar encounters (I have not), but are understandably hesitant to come forward for fear of being ridiculed.
 
...I'll never forget that night as long as I live.
Next morning, mom was making us all breakfast, and she says to me "What was so important last night that you had to wake me up?"
I told her, and she laughed, my friends that I told were amused too, so I basically stopped telling the story of this incident. 🙁

Well told anecdotal report. Reports of weird, small spheres are especially common. I suspect that more regular people than we realize have had similar encounters (I have not), but are understandably hesitant to come forward for fear of being ridiculed.
 
No one is saying interstellar flight is impossible. What we are saying is that at c there are fundamental physical constraints to overcome. If physics is the same throughout the universe then Indiglo’s post on the forces involved should be considered one of the problems.

However, the elephant in in the room remains that the required energies to accelerate even a small mass (say a 10 ton spacecraft) remain enormous.

I don’t understand how E=MC^2 can be called nonsense.
 
When was that time?

Because Otto Lillienthal worked on heavier than air flight quite successfully as did Leonardo da Vinci (his design has been built using materials available to him but it was found to produce too much lift to be stable) and then more legendary there were Daedalus & Son.

Just some takes from around the 1900's:

It is apparent to me that the possibilities of the aeroplane, which two or three years ago were thought to hold the solution to the [flying machine] problem, have been exhausted, and that we must turn elsewhere.
— Thomas Edison, November 1895

Kelvin

I can state flatly that heavier than air flying machines are impossible.
— Lord Kelvin, 1895

I have not the smallest molecule of faith in aerial navigation other than ballooning, or of the expectation of good results from any of the trials we heard of. So you will understand that I would not care to be a member of the Aeronautical Society.
— Lord Kelvin, 1896

How that turned out
 
Just about everyone on the planet now has a high resolution camera on their person. And they can, using social media, basically tell the whole world within minutes of sighting something spectacular.

And yet, we still get fuzzy photos, wild stories, outrageous claims. I used to believe that the Galaxy must be crawling with advanced civilizations.

Maybe I’m blind and too cynical (it comes with age). I dunno. I’m just not convinced anymore.


That's the problem everyone is making blurry photos and then claiming it is UFO...😀
 
No one is saying interstellar flight is impossible. What we are saying is that at c there are fundamental physical constraints to overcome. If physics is the same throughout the universe then Indiglo’s post on the forces involved should be considered one of the problems.

However, the elephant in in the room remains that the required energies to accelerate even a small mass (say a 10 ton spacecraft) remain enormous.

I don’t understand how E=MC^2 can be called nonsense.

It is nonsense because stating it doesn't exclude interstellar flight impossible.
It merely demonstrates that the possibility of doing it by classical speed enhancement (approaching C) would be low.
However, that doesn't say anything at all about it being possible by other means.

So ruling out interstellar flight is likely on the basis of classic speed enhancement, but thinking we know all there is to know about any other way we might bend space, time or whatever to achieve it is:
Unknown.
That, to me is as unscientific as, like they once did, state flying through the air was impossible, because it just shows there were other laws of physics needed to get an airplane in the air.

It would be premature saying we know all rules and applications of current as well as future physics, so it isn't possible.
It just ain't so and we should be happy about that!
 
LOL, you think an advanced alien civilization would choose to have their space craft buzz a few military planes as the best option to introduce themselves without causing panic :rofl:

There's a novel by (IIRC one of the Fred Pohl's Heechee series), where a child asks one of the main characters why the HeeChee did the things they did in the way they did. The man's response was, That's the thing about aliens, they're alien
 
No one is saying interstellar flight is impossible. What we are saying is that at c there are fundamental physical constraints to overcome.

UNDER OUR CURRENTLY UNDERSTANDING BUT IF OUR UNDERSTANDINGS ARE FLAWED THEN WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS ALSO FLAWED.

If physics is the same throughout the universe then Indiglo’s post on the forces involved should be considered one of the problems.

Physics are the same. But our knowledge is incomplete.

However, the elephant in in the room remains that the required energies to accelerate even a small mass (say a 10 ton spacecraft) remain enormous.

I don’t understand how E=MC^2 can be called nonsense.

Again, there is a reason why Einstein never got the Nobel Prize for his relativity because nobody can prove it or disprove it and it is still remained a theory.

There is space-time warping that can make interstellar traveling possible. Just because you don't understand it, does not mean it can't be done.