I got that much. I should have been more specific. I am asking about an aspheric pre-condenser. Is the job of that to correct and even the light from the source whether it be bulb with hemispherical, no reflector, or elliptical? Do I have to make sure my elliptical reflector is sending the light out at the proper angle? This thing (elliptical reflector) is concentrating A LOT of the light from this bulb into an area about an inch to inch and a half in diameter. It is so powerfull at that point that it burns cardboard almost like a fresnel and sun. I REALLY want to figure out how to harness that or I will be forced into a 1000w... which I may end up upon anyway. The "traditional" 400w with hemisphere setup works pretty good, but it is obvious it isn't pushing nearly enough light through the LCD judging by the amount of brightness, contrast, and gamma tweaking needed. I would also LOVE to REALLY even out that light spread.
Thanks so much for your informed help! School or just well studied on the subject?
Thanks so much for your informed help! School or just well studied on the subject?
measuring an ellipse
This is a bit trickier than measuring a parabola, since an ellipse has two focal points. You could successively trim a piece of cardboard until it fits into your reflector perfectly, and then use that template to find a graphical solution to the ellipse equation. That would consist of tracing the ellipse cross section curve onto a piece of paper, and finding a length of string and two focal point pins on the central axis that give you the same curve. Pretty tedious!
Or you could precisely measure the diameter at two different distances from the center of the reflector, and plug those values into the general ellipse equation to find the parameters of the equation for your ellipse. That would give you the location of the two focal points.
I would just use the experimental approach: Move a small point source lamp (ie. a flashlight bulb) along the central axis. At each position of the lamp, use a small piece of white paper to see if you can find a point on the axis where an image of the lamp filament is formed. When you do find it, the lamp position and the image position are your two focal points.
To use an elliptical reflector in a projector, you still have to make the fresnel "see" it as coming from the fresnel's focal point. So the fresnel's focal point has to coincide with the reflector's second focal point. The reflector has to be wide enough to send light to the fresnel's corners.
This is a bit trickier than measuring a parabola, since an ellipse has two focal points. You could successively trim a piece of cardboard until it fits into your reflector perfectly, and then use that template to find a graphical solution to the ellipse equation. That would consist of tracing the ellipse cross section curve onto a piece of paper, and finding a length of string and two focal point pins on the central axis that give you the same curve. Pretty tedious!
Or you could precisely measure the diameter at two different distances from the center of the reflector, and plug those values into the general ellipse equation to find the parameters of the equation for your ellipse. That would give you the location of the two focal points.
I would just use the experimental approach: Move a small point source lamp (ie. a flashlight bulb) along the central axis. At each position of the lamp, use a small piece of white paper to see if you can find a point on the axis where an image of the lamp filament is formed. When you do find it, the lamp position and the image position are your two focal points.
To use an elliptical reflector in a projector, you still have to make the fresnel "see" it as coming from the fresnel's focal point. So the fresnel's focal point has to coincide with the reflector's second focal point. The reflector has to be wide enough to send light to the fresnel's corners.
Attachments
even better
You can get even more efficient if you add a large spherical reflector (red in the drawing below) with a hole in the center. This reflector sends most of the rays that missed the elliptical reflector back through the lamp arc and into the elliptical reflector.
The amount of added light depends on the shape and reflectivity of the reflectors, but without the spherical reflector most of the light getting to the fresnel directly from the lamp would be wasted, since it would not get to the projection lens.
You can get even more efficient if you add a large spherical reflector (red in the drawing below) with a hole in the center. This reflector sends most of the rays that missed the elliptical reflector back through the lamp arc and into the elliptical reflector.
The amount of added light depends on the shape and reflectivity of the reflectors, but without the spherical reflector most of the light getting to the fresnel directly from the lamp would be wasted, since it would not get to the projection lens.
Attachments
pre-condensor lens
These are used to collect a lot of light from a very close lamp arc, and then to send that in a less divergent cone to a condensor fresnel. It works just by intersecting more of the light sphere coming from the lamp.
If your elliptical reflector light cone (after the second focal point)does not match the focal length and diameter of the condensor fresnel, then you could use a pre-condensor lens to adjust it. (But you would lose some light in the lens. Better if you can use a reflector and fresnel that match.) Determining the right pre-condensor lens to use would be done the same way you would for a non-reflector design: The second focal point of the reflector would act as the light source.
These are used to collect a lot of light from a very close lamp arc, and then to send that in a less divergent cone to a condensor fresnel. It works just by intersecting more of the light sphere coming from the lamp.
If your elliptical reflector light cone (after the second focal point)does not match the focal length and diameter of the condensor fresnel, then you could use a pre-condensor lens to adjust it. (But you would lose some light in the lens. Better if you can use a reflector and fresnel that match.) Determining the right pre-condensor lens to use would be done the same way you would for a non-reflector design: The second focal point of the reflector would act as the light source.
Hi,
I'm curious about condenser lens, how important is this lens for our DIY 15" LCD PJ?
Because from the drawing at firt page of this thread, I saw not much light can be saved, I think it's only a fraction of light and don't forget to count overall light loss due to condenserlens thickness.
I'm curious about condenser lens, how important is this lens for our DIY 15" LCD PJ?
Because from the drawing at firt page of this thread, I saw not much light can be saved, I think it's only a fraction of light and don't forget to count overall light loss due to condenserlens thickness.
How important is a pre-condensor lens
For a 15" LCD with a 220 mm or shorter fl condensor fresnel, a pre-condensor lens does not capture much more light. Look at the angles: The condensor fresnel is so close to the lamp that it already gets a lot of light.
If you have a longer focal length condensor fresnel or a smaller LCD, then a pre-condensor lens would help a lot.
For a 15" LCD with a 220 mm or shorter fl condensor fresnel, a pre-condensor lens does not capture much more light. Look at the angles: The condensor fresnel is so close to the lamp that it already gets a lot of light.
If you have a longer focal length condensor fresnel or a smaller LCD, then a pre-condensor lens would help a lot.
What kind of reflector would be best for a 15" LCD but using a larger MH bulb? Because the one i have is a 250 watt MH, but its about 6 " long. And where would i get a reflector that wouldnt cost an arm and a leg?
cheap spherical reflectors
If your bulb is about 2" in diameter, then you can probably use one of these:
http://www.culinarycookware.com/catalog.asp?catid=2800&prodid=16100
http://www.dr.ca used to have some various sizes of hemisperical stainless steel quiche molds, but I don't see them there anymore. You might call them to ask.
If you have one of those huge 3-4" diameter bulbs, then you may have to use a big spherical mixing bowl.
Either way, you will have to cut out a hole on one or both sides to get your lamp arc right at the center of the sphere. Make sure you have plenty of air flow around the bulb if you use one of these: They send the light right back through the arc, so the bulb can overheat if you don't cool it well.
If your bulb is about 2" in diameter, then you can probably use one of these:
http://www.culinarycookware.com/catalog.asp?catid=2800&prodid=16100
http://www.dr.ca used to have some various sizes of hemisperical stainless steel quiche molds, but I don't see them there anymore. You might call them to ask.
If you have one of those huge 3-4" diameter bulbs, then you may have to use a big spherical mixing bowl.
Either way, you will have to cut out a hole on one or both sides to get your lamp arc right at the center of the sphere. Make sure you have plenty of air flow around the bulb if you use one of these: They send the light right back through the arc, so the bulb can overheat if you don't cool it well.
your bulb is about 2" in diameter, then you can probably use one of these:
http://www.culinarycookware.com/cat...00&prodid=16100
What size bowl is best? will these only refleft about 65% of the light?
http://www.culinarycookware.com/cat...00&prodid=16100
What size bowl is best? will these only refleft about 65% of the light?
You can buy an IKEA napkin holder reflector from here for $4:
http://www.ireplica.com/?page=shop/browse&category_id=27d1ab6be22bc75b7863a64b4cf292bd&
It should fit most bulbs. No cutting needed
http://www.ireplica.com/?page=shop/browse&category_id=27d1ab6be22bc75b7863a64b4cf292bd&
It should fit most bulbs. No cutting needed
reflectivity
These are the maximum reflectivities, if you get the best possible mirror finish:
Stainless steel 65%
aluminum 95%
silver 98.5%
I purchased a 5" diameter stainless steel quiche mold, cut it to fit, and then had it silver plated. Very bright, but also fairly expensive. (You might be able to find a real optical aluminized glass spherical reflector for the cost of the cookware and plating.) Shop around if you go for silver plating. Prices vary a lot.
I used a luxmeter to measure my projector output with and without the reflector: 22% increase with the reflector.
These are the maximum reflectivities, if you get the best possible mirror finish:
Stainless steel 65%
aluminum 95%
silver 98.5%
I purchased a 5" diameter stainless steel quiche mold, cut it to fit, and then had it silver plated. Very bright, but also fairly expensive. (You might be able to find a real optical aluminized glass spherical reflector for the cost of the cookware and plating.) Shop around if you go for silver plating. Prices vary a lot.
I used a luxmeter to measure my projector output with and without the reflector: 22% increase with the reflector.
i wonder, do yo know what's the % increase on the light to be noticeable by the human eye?
i have a semi-mirror where half light goes through and half is reflected, well, if i use it next to a 100%mirror, hardly can say wich is wich.
i have a semi-mirror where half light goes through and half is reflected, well, if i use it next to a 100%mirror, hardly can say wich is wich.
perceiving light levels
I think it depends on how you compare the two different light levels. If you look at one level, and then switch to another, your pupils adjust very quickly so you see no difference. If you compare them side-by-side at the same time, the same thing will happen if you focus on one side, and then switch to focus on the other side.
Try a comparison where you look at both levels together from some distance. Then you can focus on the division between the two levels, and your pupils will open to match the average brightness. Then you should be able to detect much smaller differences.
Even if you can't perceive a 22% higher light level, I think it may be more comfortable for your eyes to view a screen that is not too bright or too dim.
I think it depends on how you compare the two different light levels. If you look at one level, and then switch to another, your pupils adjust very quickly so you see no difference. If you compare them side-by-side at the same time, the same thing will happen if you focus on one side, and then switch to focus on the other side.
Try a comparison where you look at both levels together from some distance. Then you can focus on the division between the two levels, and your pupils will open to match the average brightness. Then you should be able to detect much smaller differences.
Even if you can't perceive a 22% higher light level, I think it may be more comfortable for your eyes to view a screen that is not too bright or too dim.
You can buy an IKEA napkin holder reflector from here for $4:
http://www.ireplica.com/?page=shop/...63a64b4cf292bd&
It should fit most bulbs. No cutting needed"
Is this big enough for that size lamp and 15" LCd, looks sorta small..?
http://www.ireplica.com/?page=shop/...63a64b4cf292bd&
It should fit most bulbs. No cutting needed"
Is this big enough for that size lamp and 15" LCd, looks sorta small..?
The useable reflection surface of a spherical reflector is small. You don't need a half sphere. It will require cutting to fit it to your bulb and will reflect light back to the focal point at an unusable angle causing extra heat and shorter bulb life.
yes, i´ll try to do more test on it from farther view point and close mirrors.
Whether you can distingish or not 22% light increase, i don´t know but the truth is that you can have 22% larger image size with the same brigtness as without the reflector.
Whether you can distingish or not 22% light increase, i don´t know but the truth is that you can have 22% larger image size with the same brigtness as without the reflector.
You may not be able to distiguish a 22% difference becasue of your eyes adjusting whether a side-by-side comparison or other, but you are right, the brightness does make a difference in how big you can get your image and how bright your room can be. I don't think anyone in DIY projection has come close to a too bright point yet.
too bright point yet [/B]
😀 😀 😀 i belive brigtness is the main issue.
althought there is people claiming 1300 lumnes with 400W, i would say you can feel VERY VERY HAPPY if tou get 400 lumens.
Rox said:i would say you can feel VERY VERY HAPPY if you get 400 lumens.
More like 200 lumens. Time and testing will tell.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- General Interest
- Everything Else
- The Moving Image
- Optics
- Understanding Pre-Condenser lens