No, it is headphones, the most efficient. It doesn't need any heatsink, battery powered still has a long life😱
.
Still I am interested in mixture😀
Like this one:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/soli...-hybrid-linear-switching-power-amplifier.html

Still I am interested in mixture😀
Like this one:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/soli...-hybrid-linear-switching-power-amplifier.html
Class-H is much efficient than Class-AB, but don't compare it with Class-D which is totally different thing.
Having made Class-AB/H/G/D, Class-D gave me highest of efficiency and reduced Heatsink size.😉
ClassH is 8-10% more efficient than a good class AB design.
No MUCH more.
And less distortion compared with any switching amplifier design, even ClassI.
Last edited:
"ClassH is 8-10% more efficient than a good class AB design."
True, when driving sine waves.
On music with a high peak-to-average ratio it's a different story.
Have you ever been inside a Carver M1.5T?
2x 600W/4R and NO HEATSINK.
Distortion?
On music with good program material and associated gear it sounds at least as good as well respected class AB designs. The non-inverting version of the Carver M1.0T sounded even better than the M1.5T
With the better commutation diodes available today these designs can be even better (than the older designs).
There are of course poor designs of all types. A class H design from NAD didn't sound that good, even though you were listening well below the transition point (the lower rail was ±60V, enough for 400W/4R peaks while still in class AB).
True, when driving sine waves.
On music with a high peak-to-average ratio it's a different story.
Have you ever been inside a Carver M1.5T?
2x 600W/4R and NO HEATSINK.
Distortion?
On music with good program material and associated gear it sounds at least as good as well respected class AB designs. The non-inverting version of the Carver M1.0T sounded even better than the M1.5T
With the better commutation diodes available today these designs can be even better (than the older designs).
There are of course poor designs of all types. A class H design from NAD didn't sound that good, even though you were listening well below the transition point (the lower rail was ±60V, enough for 400W/4R peaks while still in class AB).
ClassH is 8-10% more efficient than a good class AB design.
No MUCH more.
And less distortion compared with any switching amplifier design, even ClassI.
A 3-Tier Class-H cuts the waste heat by as much as 30-40% when loaded with music program signals compared to Class-AB. Try it you will see.
A 3-Tier Class-H cuts the waste heat by as much as 30-40% when loaded with music program signals compared to Class-AB. Try it you will see.
😀
Hi Folks,
Here's my Complementary Vertical Mosfet Class-G amp....high efficiency in real music signals
Hope you like it.....
I am preparing the PCB's.... for my car amp.
All Tansistors are CB 2N5551/5401 & EF BC556/BC546
Mosfets IRFP540N/9540N
Opamp NE5532
Schottky's MBR160S
Rails are +- 30V, +-60V
Load is 8 ohms
power is 150Wrms
BW 150KHZ
Sine wave efficiency is around 80%
regards,
Kanwar
Shown here is conceptual schematic not actual one
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
ClassH is 8-10% more efficient than a good class AB design.
No MUCH more.
Plain wrong, The heat dissipation in class-H is almost halved when compared to similar power class-AB.
Typical class AB makes about 40% of waste heat of its rated output, 100W out = 40W waste heat.
Pure class B (with a regulated supply) is about 22% heat.
A three-rail design is about 13% heat.
Pure class B (with a regulated supply) is about 22% heat.
A three-rail design is about 13% heat.
sir,have you its schematic?
Very strong unit....seems to be very powerfull.
regards,
Carlos
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- The Class - H Amplifier