Subjective Blind ABX Test of EnABLed FF85WK - Round 6

Which clips from driver A or B, sound most like the clips from driver X?

  • Does A sound more like X?

    Votes: 6 20.7%
  • Does B sound more like X?

    Votes: 23 79.3%

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi X,

will you lift the veil and reveal which X equalled X?

I find it amazing that there were even differing opinions as to the identity of X=B; but there you go. There's a lot to learn and understand about human perception. Thanks for setting up this test.

Were X and B different drivers that were both treated/not treated?

Cheers,
A.
 
Poll is closed - the big reveal.

Thanks for participating - I really appreciate the time people took to listen and make a choice as to which sounds more like X?

The answer is X and B are the same driver. Recorded just minutes apart but all settings fixed.

Driver X=B=FF85WK pristine #1

Driver A=FF85WKeN #1

553397d1465182620-planet-10-measured-improvements-ff85wk-ff85wken-ff85wk-fr-compare-low-res.png


It looks like about 4:1 people chose the correct match to driver X. Clearly one could hear the difference. However, the pristine driver appears to be a little different than the other 3 with regards to response around 2kHz to 3kHz. So that may have contributed to the rather large margin.

You will have to read the txt files to see what people actually preferred - from what I could gather - it's kind of split. Not a clear cut case.
 
Funny how I chose A as my preference but then chose it as sounding more like X. I may have just selected the driver I liked best without caring too much about the match. I did try it twice and came to the same conclusion. I primarily listened to the Norah Jones clip.

XRK, just to be clear, was B and X the same exact driver or was each one of the two pristine drivers?
 
Last edited:
Whoa! What an unexpected result for me. So, lesson #1, slight difference of FR has nothing to do with sound difference (?)...

What I don't get is what has been the effect of conditioning to the non-pristine driver? I expect the difference is in non-linear distortion (either due to conditioning or manufacturing) but I think the THD has been shown and is similar??

Honestly I still think that the difference should be on distortion...

May be the more sensitivity on the eNabl (A) is what makes it more detailed so is perceived closer to the sound of the reference. But these details came through as disturbing?? (Hmm may be I should listen again through my speakers). But the reference is NEVER disturbing so we can not say that detail=fatigue.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. A sounded clearly more natural and realistic to me. I guess that enabled stuff works. My guess was exactly backwards. It made the driver sound crisper and less damped. I did like AC/DC better with B, but frankly AC/DC always sounds better on cheap speakers.

Initially I did think that B and X sounded the same. Then I went back and listened to one track again, and B sounded duller. Obviously my ears were deceived and I was mistaken. 😛 Perhaps I listened to a different part of the same track. 😕 Sometimes when a singer steps back from a mic the timber can change quite a bit, even if the level is leveled back to normal afterwards. More likely I was just hasty and didn't listen carefully the second time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.