I guess you missed my point entirely.
Not at all. The problem is that you are wrong about people, something outside your area of expertise. You should stop trying to diagnose people as the cause of audible artifacts in audio systems and just tell the truth: You don't know why people report hearing small effects in audio systems and you don't know how to measure what they are hearing.
Show me a speaker with a better dispersion.
You are probably not aware that with fixed delay times, it is not possible to create a point source for all frequencies.
You are probably incorrect in your statement.
You're kidding me, right? You do understand we localize direction and depth based on IID and ITD, no?You must have heard something without having a clue what it means. 😀
Interaural intensity differential is based on the distance from source to each ear, and the intensity falls off differently for near field planar (relatively constant), linear source (1/R), and point source (1/R^2)
You need to look up "capacitive divider"Again, the film is just charged by the HV with a surface square resistance of 10^6 Mohm and not charged by the audio signal.
Please stop playing to be Einstein
I teach this crap, just ask..
Sigh. If he is alive, have him call me. I'll help him as well.Yes you are right, Peter Walker was a dumbo who had no idea what he was doing, despite all backing up from the local university.
Even better would have been to replace the membrane by alu foil, that would have saved the dilemma which side to coat, doesn't it ?
Now you make up things? That I doubted it to work is a blatant lie. You should know better.The polar plot was meant to show the effectiveness of the sound dispersion with the delayed rings that you doubted to work.
If you want polar plots with different HV voltages, just do it yourself an stop instructing others what to do.
Hans
As to testing an esl, ship me a pair and I'll test them.
jn
Ahhhh.....Xenophobia, that does explain a lot 😀
In consulting Dr. Google I see that could also be the fear of aliens.......are you a alien Mark?
In consulting Dr. Google I see that could also be the fear of aliens.......are you a alien Mark?
Last edited:
... acceptable proof...
You should know by now there is no 'proof' in science. Science can progressively reduce doubt. Proof is something from mathematics, logical deduction from a few givens.
This is exactly "dancing around the issue", AKA bull four stars. Smearing, straw man, character assassination, etc... anything goes but addressing the core problem (which was not requested, BTW). Shows how low one can go to promote and defend his agenda.
A "core problem" was missed by me? Really? You mean, beside the quite substantial core problem of your constant lying and the tales of mystery and imagination?
If you have a real world example and real evidence, not just products of your vivid imagination, I'm all ears ...err,um...eyes and will of course address it accordingly. But we both know that you have not, don't we?
I accept recommendations for new music to try off people. That is an area where there is value and I have found lots of great music thanks to people on here. Not much I would use for critical analysis though.Interesting; intersubject differences are quite substantial. 🙂
Is the audio field an exception or do you feel the same about other interests, like books, movies or restaurants and recommendations/evaluations?
Other than animated movies for the kids I don't manage to watch many films.
Short to medium term I'll settle for the best measuring I can afford to build. Will give me a baseline for when I get time for critical listening and a better room to listen in.The measurement brings us back to the question about the correlation between measurements (or measured differences) and hearing sensations.
I have 6 kids. Chance to get lonely would be a fine thing 🙂Sounds kinda lonely Bill,
I’d prefer to think my audio hobby is a like minded shared experience.
In your version of this audio utopia where everything correctly engineered and not broken sounded exactly the same, what would be left to discuss..... aesthetics?
Music? That's what actually matters in all this...
Big 10-4 on that Bill,
I’m dealing with grandchildren now and their need to fill a curiosity about tweeter dome compression ratio, knob spinning, button pushing, etc.
Solved the first one with inverted dome tweeters! 😀
There’s a thread for music, but not much actual discussion of the music goes on there?
I’m dealing with grandchildren now and their need to fill a curiosity about tweeter dome compression ratio, knob spinning, button pushing, etc.
Solved the first one with inverted dome tweeters! 😀
There’s a thread for music, but not much actual discussion of the music goes on there?
If you coated both sides of the membrane and the membrane relative dielectric is 3, surely you would have the problem of an extra larg(er) capacitor interposed between the two that exist either side of the single side that is coated and would possibly create problems? Since the membrane is extremely thin (3u) relative to the airgaps either side, the additional relative dielectric increase is minimal.
Hard to believe Peter Walker would have missed something as fundamental as that. After all, he was by all counts a genius.
Hard to believe Peter Walker would have missed something as fundamental as that. After all, he was by all counts a genius.
How about non-stationary distortion for another source of your so-called illusions?
I would love to answer if you could explain what are "non stationary distortions". You mean distortion in non time invariant systems? If I would be in your shoes, I would not go there 😀.
I'm all ears ...err,um...eyes
Pleas don't, you are wasting you time. You would be much more effective by spreading FUD.
You should know by now there is no 'proof' in science.
No four stars, are you serious?
Big 10-4 on that Bill,
I’m dealing with grandchildren now and their need to fill a curiosity about tweeter dome compression ratio, knob spinning, button pushing, etc.
They love poking expensive ribbons. I mounted the equipment far enough up the wall that they can't reach it....yet...
Hard to believe Peter Walker would have missed something as fundamental as that. After all, he was by all counts a genius.
Just not enough experience ....
-RNM
Oh not the ribbons!
Hopefully by the time they can reach, you will have instilled the correct amount of fear. 😀
Hopefully by the time they can reach, you will have instilled the correct amount of fear. 😀
Just not enough experience ....
Yes, I'm sure you would not hire him as a staff member at Magnet Enterprises

So happy you slag him and me off equally, I can hold my head high again 🙄Just not enough experience ....
Yes, I'm sure you would not hire him as a staff member at Magnet Enterprises.
but I would for making ESL speakers. His area of expertise and experience.
I was never as impressed with his circuit designs. So no I probably would not hire him.
-RNM
Last edited:
I would love to answer...
You never answer, you just make up stories (aka lies




You never answer, you just make up stories (aka lies, as Jakob has 'proven'
![]()
![]()
).
Another deflection/diversion. You found a good teacher in Jakob(x).
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part IV