Is this a real TDA1541A?

DEFINITELY FAKES

For the simple reason that the S2 is printed (probably at the same time as the rest of the label) rather than being stamped on at a later date.

The S1 or S2 were selected items. Every one I've seen (genuine that is) has been 'hand-stamped'

.

Not quite true - this isn't a fake... 😀
 

Attachments

  • 1541s2.jpg
    1541s2.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 927
With all this fever surrounding the TDA1541 chips and the special S1 and S2 selected versions, you'd think Philips would cottoned onto it by now and start re-manufacturing these chips.....

Maybe we should start a petition haha :scratch2:
 
On that pic the S2 was not printed at the same time as the TDA1541A, Andy's statement remains true.
They won't use different font set just for the S & 2, just a second machine to print 😉
On the S and 2 on the main print it's obvious, the S2 is more fat. (and for me slanting a bit).
 
I am posting for comparation, pictures of two original cips (Philips CD473) - SAA7220P/A and TDA1541 (non-A but it might help with the datecodes).
Looks like at some point, Philips stoped stamping the company sigla on the cips (cost saving?).
 

Attachments

  • SAA7220PA.jpg
    SAA7220PA.jpg
    247.5 KB · Views: 821
  • TDA1541.JPG
    TDA1541.JPG
    245.7 KB · Views: 799
Last edited:
Good to know.. Ill build the analogmetric dac and see... ill try to post something .. many innocent diy<er said the dac sounded really good. I have many real tda to benchmark against.

So far the thing I hate about is I bought canned opamps from china that were unusable , lost 98 $... now these parts costed me a lot from analogmetric... the legs of the IC<s are soft brushed metal, not shinny like quality ic<s