sorry but I cannot register there, everything is in duch 🙁
Is there any way to answer the remaining questions please?
Is there any way to answer the remaining questions please?
JohanH said:sorry bout that
YesI have got the complete original article but it is not in english that is why I am asking if I can use only batteries, plus the other questions.
Then Yes you could,
But how would you ensure both batteries discharging at the same rate and thus avoiding DC offset?
But how would you ensure both batteries discharging at the same rate and thus avoiding DC offset?
I used batterys for a low power son of zen amp and while it
sounded fine charging them was a pain. You might think about
building a 24v +&- supply and keep a 1/2A trickle charge going
all the time through rcrcrc filter.
sounded fine charging them was a pain. You might think about
building a 24v +&- supply and keep a 1/2A trickle charge going
all the time through rcrcrc filter.
So you think it is better to try to translate the original article and try to use one of the authors approaches instead of trying the battery-only solution?
Hiraga says:
Following the article in Issue 29, many readers have asked if, in the "Monster" version, the mains supply was used only to charge the two large 40 A/h batteries. In fact, two modes of use are possible. The batteries can be used as the only power supply source, but take heed, the endurance hardly exceeds a few hours, lead-acid batteries are sensitive to deep discharges and their lifespan depends on this, so 12.2V is a lower limit that, above all, should not be exceeded. The second mode, which is the one that which we most usually employ, consists of using the batteries only as a buffer, with the mains charging the power supply permanently. Of course, in this solution, the power supply noise rises considerably, by 30 to 40 dB. However, in spite of this, the Monster remains an amplifier without rival, even if it loses in "luminosity" compared to its operation on batteries and without a mains supply.
Does it mean I can use only batteries for power supply?
In this case do I need to connect parallel to the batteries the big and smaller capacitors or just the batteries should be sound perfect?
Following the article in Issue 29, many readers have asked if, in the "Monster" version, the mains supply was used only to charge the two large 40 A/h batteries. In fact, two modes of use are possible. The batteries can be used as the only power supply source, but take heed, the endurance hardly exceeds a few hours, lead-acid batteries are sensitive to deep discharges and their lifespan depends on this, so 12.2V is a lower limit that, above all, should not be exceeded. The second mode, which is the one that which we most usually employ, consists of using the batteries only as a buffer, with the mains charging the power supply permanently. Of course, in this solution, the power supply noise rises considerably, by 30 to 40 dB. However, in spite of this, the Monster remains an amplifier without rival, even if it loses in "luminosity" compared to its operation on batteries and without a mains supply.
Does it mean I can use only batteries for power supply?
In this case do I need to connect parallel to the batteries the big and smaller capacitors or just the batteries should be sound perfect?
Neazoi,
Perhaps look at it this way,
you will need something to charge the batteries correct ?
if yes then why not build the supply with capacitors to charge the batteries and then you can use it in both "modes"
- if you have two 80AH lead acid batteries then you are half way there.
have you seen the pictures of the completed (original) amplifier ?
-Dan
Perhaps look at it this way,
you will need something to charge the batteries correct ?
if yes then why not build the supply with capacitors to charge the batteries and then you can use it in both "modes"
- if you have two 80AH lead acid batteries then you are half way there.
have you seen the pictures of the completed (original) amplifier ?
-Dan
yes I have seen them. the third configuration seems to be the best. http://neazoi.com/page/audio/monstre/monstre.htm
I am thinking of using his configuration, but the question is, in battery only mode, do I need the capacitors after the pi-filter or the batteries themselves are sufficient?
(I consider the power that will be instantaneously drawn by the amplifier in sharp music volumes. capacitors can provide full instantaneous power)
I am thinking of using his configuration, but the question is, in battery only mode, do I need the capacitors after the pi-filter or the batteries themselves are sufficient?
(I consider the power that will be instantaneously drawn by the amplifier in sharp music volumes. capacitors can provide full instantaneous power)
neazoi,
are you seriously considering battery supply?
Battery supply greatly enhances the "luminosity" of any amplifier. The capacitor bank is still necessary for providing adequate signal ground.
are you seriously considering battery supply?
Battery supply greatly enhances the "luminosity" of any amplifier. The capacitor bank is still necessary for providing adequate signal ground.
i have also thought about this question....
i look at it this way:
Lead acid batteries in 50-100AH range are available with 100-1000 micro Ohm internal resistance.
typical large (ELNA - respected brand) electrolytics
ref: http://www.elna.co.jp/en/capacitor/alumi/catalog/index.html
are around 0.014 Ohm ESR (68000/16V),
three in parallell would be ~0.005 Ohms (ESR) for the 6 cap bank shown...
so 5 milli Ohms compared with 0.1-1 milli Ohms.... would suggest the
battery option has better transient performance. - if you select the correct battery.
-Dan
i look at it this way:
Lead acid batteries in 50-100AH range are available with 100-1000 micro Ohm internal resistance.
typical large (ELNA - respected brand) electrolytics
ref: http://www.elna.co.jp/en/capacitor/alumi/catalog/index.html
are around 0.014 Ohm ESR (68000/16V),
three in parallell would be ~0.005 Ohms (ESR) for the 6 cap bank shown...
so 5 milli Ohms compared with 0.1-1 milli Ohms.... would suggest the
battery option has better transient performance. - if you select the correct battery.
-Dan
Lumba Ogir said:neazoi,
The capacitor bank is still necessary for providing adequate signal ground.
sorry lumba Ogir I have to disagree here.
you can ground from the mid point of the batteries.
-Dan
Sorry Daniel, I did not mean it that way, as my intention is not to discuss this matter here, my revised answer is, the capacitor bank is still necessary.
Yes battery was one of the reasons for deciding to make this amp. there is no cleaner supply than the battery.
but why are the capacitors really needed if in battery only operation?
a relevant article would be helpful, as these caps cot a lot
but why are the capacitors really needed if in battery only operation?
a relevant article would be helpful, as these caps cot a lot
I just typed a huge rant about batteries supplies cel voltage etc etc etc
but i deleted because i lost my train of thought. so here is another one:
what it comes down to is if you want to listen to the amp for more than a 2-4h then you will need a bigger battery. or a mains supply.
the capacitors and inductors form a very large filter with a very low frequency roll off. 68000uf x 6(3 per rail) with 0.5 Ohm is something like 1.56Hz add the other caps and its even lower. this is used to filter the hum from the main supply which is there to support the batteries for a longer listening time.
if some one has actually heard a full battery "le monstre" please let us know what you thought ? for the most part i can only go on the listening critiques in l'audiophile magazine.
i can only personally comment on the le monstre i built which to my ear sounded very good - perhaps the best i amplifier i have heard. despite its low power.
i used a reg supply and >120000uF per rail of capacitance *after the regulators. and in my setup at the time the hiss/hum was inaudible with the input muted.
when you plugged in a cd player with your ear pressed against the tweeter you could hear the cd players power supply noise floor.
Neazoi, maybe build the amp and use the batteries to test it first and see your results so you can at least listen to the amp.
then over time add capacitance if you hear the need for it then you can comment on how it performs and sounds with the added supply componenets
sorry for the massive post
i hope it helps not confuses.
-Dan
but i deleted because i lost my train of thought. so here is another one:
what it comes down to is if you want to listen to the amp for more than a 2-4h then you will need a bigger battery. or a mains supply.
the capacitors and inductors form a very large filter with a very low frequency roll off. 68000uf x 6(3 per rail) with 0.5 Ohm is something like 1.56Hz add the other caps and its even lower. this is used to filter the hum from the main supply which is there to support the batteries for a longer listening time.
if some one has actually heard a full battery "le monstre" please let us know what you thought ? for the most part i can only go on the listening critiques in l'audiophile magazine.
i can only personally comment on the le monstre i built which to my ear sounded very good - perhaps the best i amplifier i have heard. despite its low power.
i used a reg supply and >120000uF per rail of capacitance *after the regulators. and in my setup at the time the hiss/hum was inaudible with the input muted.
when you plugged in a cd player with your ear pressed against the tweeter you could hear the cd players power supply noise floor.
Neazoi, maybe build the amp and use the batteries to test it first and see your results so you can at least listen to the amp.
then over time add capacitance if you hear the need for it then you can comment on how it performs and sounds with the added supply componenets
sorry for the massive post
i hope it helps not confuses.
-Dan
Daniel,
I don`t feel like discussing this issue at the moment, rather want to congratulate you on the nice work. Would you mind presenting the final version with the devices used?
I don`t feel like discussing this issue at the moment, rather want to congratulate you on the nice work. Would you mind presenting the final version with the devices used?
Hi Lumba,
Thats ok.
Sadly I sold my version of Le Monstre some time ago.
I may build another though.
The information about the build is here:
http://diyaudioprojects.com/Solid/Jean-Hiraga-Le-Monstre/
I also built my own version of Hiraga's Le class A,
The info is here
http://diyaudioprojects.com/Solid/Jean-Hiraga-Class-A-Amplifier/
-Dan
Thats ok.
Sadly I sold my version of Le Monstre some time ago.
I may build another though.
The information about the build is here:
http://diyaudioprojects.com/Solid/Jean-Hiraga-Le-Monstre/
I also built my own version of Hiraga's Le class A,
The info is here
http://diyaudioprojects.com/Solid/Jean-Hiraga-Class-A-Amplifier/
-Dan
Dan,
http://diyaudioprojects.com/Solid/J...ss-A-Amplifier/
This is a less clean version, are the comp caps really needed? I only like the 8W topology.
http://diyaudioprojects.com/Solid/J...ss-A-Amplifier/
This is a less clean version, are the comp caps really needed? I only like the 8W topology.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Hiraga "Le Monstre"