First Watt F7 review

Thank you lhquam for the working schematic of post #544 of a balanced F7.

Two questions:-
Can this be implemented by doubling 2SK1058, 2SJ162 as Output devices; if yes, what would be the optimal value of Source Resistors?

Is the sound of your Implementation close to the actual F7 described by 6moons?

Thanks.
 
Thank you lhquam for the working schematic of post #544 of a balanced F7.

Two questions:-
Can this be implemented by doubling 2SK1058, 2SJ162 as Output devices; if yes, what would be the optimal value of Source Resistors?

Is the sound of your Implementation close to the actual F7 described by 6moons?

Thanks.

If Vgs of the 2SK1058, 2SJ162 output fets are reasonably well matched at the idle current then you should not need any source resistors.

I have only run simulations of the balanced amplifier, but I am fairly confident that it will perform well, perhaps requiring a few resistor tweaks. The harmonic spectrum shown in the simulations closely matches the F7. I have built an approximation of the FirstWatt F7 and the measurements agree fairly well with the simulations.
 
In my opinion it's the combination of both positive and negative feedback loops that gives you the desired properties otherwise I don't think Nelson would have used both negative and positive feedback in his F7 amp.

F7, its many clones by lhquam, and the suggestions by Mr. Pass in post#535, show a general nature of this design approach; which is great news.

The equations by lhquam for designing his F7 clones do not show dependence on the power stage's idle current; suggesting [also per Pass] they are usable in amps operating in Class AB, B, or even D.

A mono block [any Class of operation] may sit next to the loudspeaker and exercise its gift of high DF; which is also desirable in a powered loudspeaker or a subwoofer.
 
F7, its many clones by lhquam, and the suggestions by Mr. Pass in post#535, show a general nature of this design approach; which is great news.

The equations by lhquam for designing his F7 clones do not show dependence on the power stage's idle current; suggesting [also per Pass] they are usable in amps operating in Class AB, B, or even D.

A mono block [any Class of operation] may sit next to the loudspeaker and exercise its gift of high DF; which is also desirable in a powered loudspeaker or a subwoofer.


The design equations assume that the behaviour of the amplifier is characterized by gm, the amplifier transconductance, which is influenced by many factors, including the idle current.
 
The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Good morning Papa and Diyers

What technology type of resistor are this fat green : metal oxide , wirewound or ... ?
 

Attachments

  • 5B93BDC7-E930-42F1-A673-C0DCD1BA4525.PNG
    5B93BDC7-E930-42F1-A673-C0DCD1BA4525.PNG
    130.3 KB · Views: 1,335
  • E0A5F513-0450-45C9-B826-6238D4570716.JPG
    E0A5F513-0450-45C9-B826-6238D4570716.JPG
    186.9 KB · Views: 1,226
I'm very interested in this statement:
"The best part is that you can even do this
with amps you have already built, and impress your audio buddies
with the awesome and mysterious power of positive feedback!"

Is there a modification for a stock F5 (F5.7 ?) that would allow me to impress at least myself ? The 6 topologies proposed are not complicated, but not easy to implement in an existing amp.

D.
 
I'm very interested in this statement:
"The best part is that you can even do this with amps you have already built, ...
I think the keyword is the highlighted words. One way to do it on a stock diyF5 it to implement Type 2 of the alternatives on post #442.
Simply :
- install R1 on input
- place an Rsen between ground and Negative speaker terminal
- connect an Rfbp between Jfet gates and Negative speaker terminal
Shouldn't take more than 15 minutes once the parts are ready.
But, it's a different story when someone else built your amp. I'd suggest to take your time and digest the good old 1500+ posts of F5 power amplifier thread.