F4 Beast Builders

Here is a Gm vs. I(d) plot for the 2sk2013. It tracks excellently with the datasheet.

BUT, the bias situation is far from perfect.
At 50mA, Gm=.3 S. The Vgs vs. temperature plot in post #373 has a slope of -1.8mV/C. If the bias current is adjusted for 50mA at an operating temperature 20C above ambient, the bias current will be 1.8mV/C * 20C * .3 S = 10. 8mA lower at the ambient startuptemperature.
Nice work.
I have a stack of different types of small heatsinks, I might test the performance for confirmation of their specs.
In the end though I might just mount them on the main heatsink and bias them to 300mA. Hahaha
 
With the cascoded jfets is possible to adjust the H2 magnitude and polarity without using cascode feedback or jfet source resistors. Connecting a resistor from one of the cascode BJT emitters to ground (or rail) will inject a (almost) constant current into emitter, requiring a change to the drian load resistance in order to zero the FE output offset. Changing the drain load resistance also changes the open-loop gain of the jfet stage, thereby changing the H2 balance. Try it.
 

Attachments

  • cascode-H2-adjust.asc.jpg
    cascode-H2-adjust.asc.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 391
not so fast.....😀😀

I just did your last suggestion!

good Spice values and good sound!

I ordered bigger heatsink for the SK/J not to come in trouble with the possible thermal runaway. In some days I can try to omit the source resistors.
 

Attachments

  • F4 beast with local feedback.png
    F4 beast with local feedback.png
    480.5 KB · Views: 381
not so fast.....😀😀

I just did your last suggestion!

good Spice values and good sound!

I ordered bigger heatsink for the SK/J not to come in trouble with the possible thermal runaway. In some days I can try to omit the source resistors.

No need to worry. You probably want both negative cascode feedback and some difference in the amount applied to the positive and negative sides.

I was only making a comment about another aspect of cascoded front ends, independent of the use of cascode negative feedback.
 
Yes I understood of course, it was more a joke ....:--))

Isn't it possible to do the same with an intended "missetting" of the 500 pots at the J-Fets and then adjusting the offset of the front end with the 5k pot in the outputstage?
 
PSRR becomes an issue, unless the ends of the pot are connected stable voltage sources, such as the cascode bias generators driving the bases of the cascode BJTs. Otherwise any hum or noise on the power rails would couple through the feedback network.

The circuit I presented in post #383 also has that problem if the resistors to the rails are used, but is OK with the resistors to ground.
 
Yes I understood of course, it was more a joke ....:--))

Isn't it possible to do the same with an intended "missetting" of the 500 pots at the J-Fets and then adjusting the offset of the front end with the 5k pot in the outputstage?

You will also need to check the dc offset at the front end is under 1V otherwise you will lose voltage swing due to clipping at the front end.

I'm not sure if you need that many cat skins to play with when the end result is essentially the same. Just choose a method and build brothers.
 
You will also need to check the dc offset at the front end is under 1V otherwise you will lose voltage swing due to clipping at the front end.

I'm not sure if you need that many cat skins to play with when the end result is essentially the same. Just choose a method and build brothers.

Most of the fun for me is the change of the circuit to get an impression how the sound is influenced.....!
 
What efficiency can be expected from the power supply?
Don't know when brother Generg will be back so here is my 2c.
Without knowing whether CRC is employed and if it is, we don't know the value of R so we can only speculate. Not that, that is the biggest loss, but it all adds up I suppose.
I've never bothered with that sought of calculation too much, a close estimation is probably good enough.
So what do we have
Diode Voltage Drop
IR heating of primary and secondary windings
CRC losses
Is there anything else? Generg will most likely know


I'll probably just go with regular 4 x 0.47 in parallel but I'll be using 528000 uF in capacitance
 
Last edited:
Has anyone looked carefully at the plots in the XA25 User Manual? The THD % scale appears to be off by a factor of 0.1. The plots show 0.01% THD at 50W into 4R, but the written specs say 0.1%. BTW: Where did the User Manual come from? I cannot find it on the Pass Labs site.