Hmm, on sale now for $153 🙁. Regardless, what are measured specs? Published is pure 'floobydust'.Ddx 12 is a good candidate for all of this at $143 shipped
Enough new stuff Vs the ancient NACA doc to warrant the price?
damn,,, it was 143 weeks ago... hope this trend do not continue of jacking all prices upHmm, on sale now for $153 🙁. Regardless, what are measured specs? Published is pure 'floobydust'.
maybe the DDX12 went viral and by demand they jacked up the price.
It’s been ‘viral’ for 2 plus years. Greatest ‘real’ motorforce per dollar in a 12” in all if the known universe😝. (Doesn’t mean it sounds that good. but it’s fun?)
These are the legends that inspire new tattoos.It’s been ‘viral’ for 2 plus years. Greatest ‘real’ motorforce per dollar in a 12” in all if the known universe😝. (Doesn’t mean it sounds that good. but it’s fun?)
You have to ask? 😉this NACA doc?😃
See! Even maths teacher's have fun with speaker boxes. 😆
he lost me at 2x2= 4 PII something something on the board. (That is me in the background)
.
"just try it and see what happens" that is mostly my standard for testing designs
he lost me at 2x2= 4 PII something something on the board. (That is me in the background)
.
"just try it and see what happens" that is mostly my standard for testing designs
Last edited:
How do you model the final part of this layout?
For an effective simulation, it would be necessary to take into account the total volume of air in the fold, the effective length of the fold, the distance of the cone center from the opening center, and the offset of the speaker from the previous section (and consequent distance of the cone center from the center of the previous section).
It's a real challenge for a model that doesn't use FEM, but I think I've come up with a very good approximation. Do you know of such a design with reliable measurements to test the model?
LOL !!!See! Even maths teacher's have fun with speaker boxes. 😆
he lost me at 2x2= 4 PII something something on the board. (That is me in the background)
.View attachment 1148399
"just try it and see what happens" that is mostly my standard for testing designs
you owe me a keyboard!!!!
(coffee all over the place )
a TH arrangement as the original PAL12How do you model the final part of this layout?
For an effective simulation, it would be necessary to take into account the total volume of air in the fold, the effective length of the fold, the distance of the cone center from the opening center, and the offset of the speaker from the previous section (and consequent distance of the cone center from the center of the previous section).
It's a real challenge for a model that doesn't use FEM, but I think I've come up with a very good approximation. Do you know of such a design with reliable measurements to test the model?
for now im only using what BP1 modified from the original model, that is making longer the baffle to accommodate 2 drivers in top of each other
but there is the option of put the drivers side to side making the cabinet wider.
those 2 sims will tell what is the best way to implement the 2 SKAR 12's
still, my HR knowledge is too rudimentary but i am doing my best to come up with something and people over here helping in the process
FEM ( Finite Electromechanical Mangle )It's a real challenge for a model that doesn't use FEM, but I think I've come up with a very good approximation. Do you know of such a design with reliable measurements to test the model?
what is FEM ?
😝👍🏼😝😝!!See! Even maths teacher's have fun with speaker boxes. 😆
he lost me at 2x2= 4 PII something something on the board. (That is me in the background)
.View attachment 1148399
"just try it and see what happens" that is mostly my standard for testing designs
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- Dual Skar12 paraflex C CRAM