DIY Audio Analyzer with AK5397/AK5394A and AK4490

Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
RTX: 0dB output and 0dB input scales
REW: 10 mV
 

Attachments

  • Loopback.png
    Loopback.png
    124 KB · Views: 527
NicMac
Here is how mine looks.
0dB output range, 10dB input range, 0dBV REW generator.
Your input signal is -9,99V not as stated 0dBv.
But anyway I could not repeat that, nor with 0dBV signal nor with -10dBV signal.
Are you sure that your input range is 10V?

Here it is what I get:

RTX input range 10V, first signal 0dBV(1V rms), than signal -10dBm(316mVrms):
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=794719&stc=1&d=1573729197

https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=794719&stc=1&d=1573729197

On 3,16V(10dBV) RTX input range the same signals looks like:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=794720&stc=1&d=1573729351

https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=794721&stc=1&d=1573729501

Obviously you input range was 3,16V(10dBV) and not 10V
 

Attachments

  • -10dBV signal on 10V RTX input range.png
    -10dBV signal on 10V RTX input range.png
    131.3 KB · Views: 530
  • 0dBV signal on 10V RTX input range.png
    0dBV signal on 10V RTX input range.png
    132.6 KB · Views: 528
  • 0dBV signal on 3,16V RTX input range.png
    0dBV signal on 3,16V RTX input range.png
    138.9 KB · Views: 518
  • -10dBV signal on 3,16V RTX input range.png
    -10dBV signal on 3,16V RTX input range.png
    136.5 KB · Views: 501
  • -10dBV signal 339A on 3,16V RTX input range.png
    -10dBV signal 339A on 3,16V RTX input range.png
    130.3 KB · Views: 71
Last edited:
I will try to reassume again what NicMac had shown:
He had set the front panel control switches :
Input section : to 0dB (1Vrms)
Output section: to 0dB (1Vrms)

Then he had set the dac output value to -40dBFs (or 10mV) . I do not know what is the correct name convention in Rew, it should be like 'generator settings'.

That is all that is needed.

Nicmac has done it properly right, also I had been asking for that.

Ciao, George
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Reducing the level in the digital realm has the effect of reducing the ENOB. You aren't using as many bits to represent the signal, and that will increase the distortion.

I use an unmodified HP 339A as well along with the RTX. They each have their strengths and weaknesses. So which one I use depends on what I'm doing.

-Chris
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Figure the RTX operates at an internal level of 3V. For 10V out there is gain. For 1V out there is an attenuator in the chain. Similar for the input side. However the SNR penalty is higher for the input side. This is true of all analyzers whether digitally based like the RTX or all analog like the HP. For example the AP performance numbers are all measured at around 3V to get the best results.
 
Figure the RTX operates at an internal level of 3V. For 10V out there is gain. For 1V out there is an attenuator in the chain. Similar for the input side. However the SNR penalty is higher for the input side. This is true of all analyzers whether digitally based like the RTX or all analog like the HP. For example the AP performance numbers are all measured at around 3V to get the best results.
Now it is clear to me(and I also should use bigger FFT length),
Demian, George, NicMac, mbrennwa and Chris - many TNX:up:
 
Last edited:
You have done very well job here, my congratulation!
I see a THD difference btw two channel, at -9dBFS signal one gives 0.000109 the other 0.000045, due to the 2nd and 3rd harmonics. At -3dBFS the first one channel has more 2nd that the other channel.
Is that due from signal generator or difference in values of ADC electronic parts?
 

Attachments

  • THD @ -4dB@1000Hz_OscilloMeter @88200.jpg
    THD @ -4dB@1000Hz_OscilloMeter @88200.jpg
    717.1 KB · Views: 295
  • imd13_14pg.jpg
    imd13_14pg.jpg
    723.9 KB · Views: 282
  • imd19_20.jpg
    imd19_20.jpg
    720.4 KB · Views: 278
  • imd @ 250&8000.jpg
    imd @ 250&8000.jpg
    722.6 KB · Views: 92