DAC AD1862: Almost THT, I2S input, NOS, R-2R

I have some other LT1963+LT3015 regulators with identical components on both LDO. And everything works as it should. In the datasheet, they write only the maximum recommended values, I see no reason for different values on the plus and minus regulators. That's why I ask.
 
Strange as the datasheets clearly show different values for same voltage output for the two regs. Now this is also a difference ratio between the resistors ? And the programmable Lt19xx and LT30xx are also different than the standalone voltage output ones ?
 
Now this is also a difference ratio between the resistors ?
No, the resistor ratio must be the same. It can be seen from the formula of the output voltage. The only difference is that the current on the Adj pin is lower with the LT3015 than with the LT1963, but if the resistor values are small this is negligible. And you have a trimmer for fine tuning.

I used fixed resistors that I had. I achieved +-4.98V, +11.44V and -11.51V. I can adjust more accurately, but I don't care if it's 12V or 11.44V/11.51V on the Sparkos.
 
Last edited:
Here are the pictures. All values are the same for positive and negative LDO. I removed the silly little SMD trimmers and put in fixed resistors.
 

Attachments

  • 4.98.jpg
    4.98.jpg
    224.9 KB · Views: 146
  • 11.44.jpg
    11.44.jpg
    239.9 KB · Views: 154
  • 11.51.jpg
    11.51.jpg
    243.3 KB · Views: 155
On the PSU2, resistor and trimmer values are not the same with LT1963 and LT3015. Can I use the same values for the plus and minus sides, with all values as for the LT1963?
Yes you can use the same "ratio" values for both sides. I only followed datasheet for the quiescent current, but it seems be not very important for the performance of these regulators 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: NIXIE62
In principle, in those places, smaller resistors are always placed on that voltage divider than is prescribed as max. value in the datasheet. Some put larger resistors abusing the safety margin left by the manufacturer for the voltage regulator to work properly.
 
AD1865 vs PCM63- my view
Bass area better AD1865.
Mid and high Better PCM63.
The differences are not big, but they are audible.
Bass ... AD1865 has more of it, more present, tighter, more precise. PCM63 has it, but after AD, something is missing.
Mids and highs ... somehow more natural and realistic, voices and instruments got something that AD doesn't have. Salted it with magic dust. The cymbal on the Jakob Bo - Gefion got something I can't describe. There was another song where I heard some other sounds that I didn't hear and then returned it. Now, as good as it is, it doesn't work for a bad production. It is more noticeable with PCM63 when something is not OK.
Stage ... no complaints, I'd just have to listen to it and compare. I honestly have no idea.
Conclusion ... if I hadn't heard the PCM63 and compared it directly with the AD1865 I would think it is the same. Well, I heard it. Since I have boards, chips, and I'm missing a few capassitors, resistors ... I'll make it.

miro1360, thanks again for the excellent dacs
PCM63P DAC plays even better now. The bass is even stronger now than it was then. The middle tones are even more natural and lively. This DAC must be allowed to play for at least a month. Nothing should be touched for at least a month. Then it shows the maximum.👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: miro1360
So like wine, maybe in 10 years it will be even better, and maybe during that time you will learn to make a good tube output.🤣🤣
I hope that after this I will be in the ignore list because it is a sin to mention the tube here.🤣🤣