CheapoModo: quick and dirty transformer snubber bellringer jig

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Ding dong ... or not quite but almost.

Last night I had some time to throw together the Cheapomodo. Took about 3hours. However as the evening drew to an end I had no time checking it before hooking it up to the transformer. I hope I did everything ok and will double check tonight. Attached you can find some pics so if you see a major hiccup please let me know.

I thought I had read somewhere a post from Mark on how to check the thing before going hot but I simply can’t find it anymore. A hint would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • C432F9B4-FF75-4295-9480-D20498C450D2.jpg
    C432F9B4-FF75-4295-9480-D20498C450D2.jpg
    921.1 KB · Views: 314
  • 558B4441-164B-49D0-BB65-4C4D0D210A9D.jpg
    558B4441-164B-49D0-BB65-4C4D0D210A9D.jpg
    998.7 KB · Views: 301
Last edited:
Oh I am in trouble. It doesn’t work. Nothing. See pic below. I would have expected to see something on the scope channel which connects to the drain pin. Nothing.

I double checked all the connections and resistor values. Also measured with the diode test mode the Mosfets from source to drain and got ca .7v. Opposite direction ca 1.4v.

What am I doing wrong? Wrong MOSFET? Wrong PNP Transistor? Wrong SE555? Fried components? How can I find out as this is out of my league.

Thanks. Really appreciate any help.
 

Attachments

  • DF60923F-68C5-45F0-AED6-ACD65BA5E1B0.jpg
    DF60923F-68C5-45F0-AED6-ACD65BA5E1B0.jpg
    981.2 KB · Views: 275
Last edited:
What am I doing wrong? Wrong MOSFET? Wrong PNP Transistor? Wrong SE555? Fried components? How can I find out as this is out of my league.
Thanks. Really appreciate any help.


Probe with the scope leg 3 of the 555 chip, see if you get a square wave output...
If not, look for a hookup error. fix it and move to the next stage for validation of the signal, and so on to the last stage.

Good luck....
 
Thanks to the two of you. I certainly got the square wave on leg 3 alright.

Mark am I understanding your post correctly. I need to switch the pins of the PNP? Well, testing the unmounted pnp with a multimeter confirmed the change in the data sheet. Base is indeed the 3rd leg.

Do you think the wrong current installation caused some harm to the rest of the circuit?

Again thx a lot for your help and time.
 
Last edited:
I think I did it. Switch the PNPs pins according to the data sheet of the BC636 with 1 being Emitter, 2 Collector and 3 Base, which differs from the originally used PNP.

Please find attached the scope curves with yellow resembling the output while using Cx 10nF, Cs 150nF and the resistor disconnected. Timebase 1ms/div. Blue is the signal taken from the drain pin of the mosfet.

What do you think does that look ok?

No time today to hook up a transformer. Got to go shopping early tomorrow morning with the wife.
 

Attachments

  • 7E5B453C-7E72-41C3-B656-FB83CB2349C0.jpg
    7E5B453C-7E72-41C3-B656-FB83CB2349C0.jpg
    690.7 KB · Views: 181
So guys. Here are my results on a 800VA, 230v prim. , 2x25v sec. Amplimo toroid.

Cx10nF, Cs150nF, Rs10ohm seems to dampen the ringing.

With Rs infinite the ringing is at approx 1Mhz. In this case the primaries and the secondaries were shortened. It did make a difference though if both the secondaries were connected via the center conductor.

Scope: 500mV/div, 500nS/div.
 

Attachments

  • 04856F00-00FC-4C94-BC1A-16D93794546C.jpg
    04856F00-00FC-4C94-BC1A-16D93794546C.jpg
    750.3 KB · Views: 175
  • D0BA23DC-A31E-4219-875A-C680F9D70B35.jpg
    D0BA23DC-A31E-4219-875A-C680F9D70B35.jpg
    766.5 KB · Views: 151
Last edited:
I also tried just a simple C element of C150nF and with C100nF. (without the RC). It didn’t eliminate the ringing, it only reduced the ringing frequency to ca 500kHz.

Scope: 2V/div , 2us/div.
 

Attachments

  • DC43DE0E-0316-4083-B87C-E86C066FC1C5.jpg
    DC43DE0E-0316-4083-B87C-E86C066FC1C5.jpg
    935.6 KB · Views: 143
  • 42DF47EC-BFF4-4BA3-AC89-D810E6445067.jpg
    42DF47EC-BFF4-4BA3-AC89-D810E6445067.jpg
    909.8 KB · Views: 129
Last edited:
Provided my experimental setup and measurements were sound, the question comes to mind if for this particular toroid a simple C element would suffice. Wouldn’t any decently engineered audio amp be unaffected by any ringing wether it is at 500kHz or even 1Mhz?

During the next weeks I will look at the PSU output and compare it with CRC snubber and with only C 150nF.
 
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2011
Paid Member
Generally I use the Epcos B32529 series of film capacitors, with 250V DC rating. Going up to 400V wouldn't hurt anything.

Be sure to use the very same capacitors in your Cheapomodo testing, that you solder into your final equipment. That way your dialled-up optimum Rs will include the actual (rather than the stated) capacitance.
 
Member
Joined 2011
Paid Member
It's fairly well hidden, I'm afraid. Post #1 in this thread tells you that the very latest schematic for the very latest tiny tweak (v.3) is in post #132. And the schematic attached to post #132 says, in bold letters, SE555 PREFERRED. The datasheet guaranteed range of supply voltage for correct operation, is slightly wider on the SE555 than on the NE555. That's why I slightly prefer the SE555 for Cheapomodo. Either will work beautifully; SE555 will work beautifully over a slightly wider range of supply voltages. However, to be honest, most people just use a 9V power supply (battery!) with Cheapomodo and either NE555 or SE555 will work beautifully at 9V.

Post #1 shows an NE555 because that's the name of the simulation model that comes with the LTSPICE circuit simulator.
 
At first i would like to thank Mark Johnson for creating this project and Dennis Miller for sending me a PCB for free.

The cheapomodo worked from the first time, but I cannot damp the ringing.
Here is the trace of one secondary of a 2X18VAC toroid with RV1 fully anticlockwise, CX=10nF and CS=150nF.
Turning RV1 clockwise makes the trace worse. I will experiment with CS values.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00989 (Small).JPG
    DSC00989 (Small).JPG
    55.7 KB · Views: 268
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.