CFH7 Amp

Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
Something like this.
 

Attachments

  • 8A27ABDB-B1D9-43A1-953C-8C5E6C692B95.jpg
    8A27ABDB-B1D9-43A1-953C-8C5E6C692B95.jpg
    580 KB · Views: 242
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
The models might not be that accurate. I think the topology is going to affect the harmonic profile more than the actives. This CFA front end topology is inherently dominant third harmonic. But that assumes perfect matching of the N and P sides. In reality they are not and so overall THD will be higher along with the more desirable second harmonic. I think all we can do is build test and listen at this point. If you wanted to induce some more H2 make the source resistors asymmetric. 0.15ohm and 0.22ohm for example.
 
i tested something but i can't reduce THD down to THT variant with BC546/556;KSA/KSC types


tested also a completely different input ...
see .asc file
but it does not help



so i will attach the first version of THT variant include Gerber
see .zip
 

Attachments

  • CDH11_V1_cplt.zip
    492 KB · Views: 88
  • CFH11-Cx-xrk971_v3_SMD_test_diff.asc
    19.4 KB · Views: 83
Last edited:
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
You can build the board with optional TH pads for those that want to try regular TO92 and TO126 actives. Doesn’t take up too much room as there is plenty of space on the PCB. One board for both. I would label components generically rather than actual value. That leaves the chance for adjustments or error corrections in BOM part values. I do like convenience is stuffing a part without looking at a schematic and spreadsheet though.
 
input is very easy :D
that is a very good idea

TO126 ... is a bit more complex
one idea is like the picture

but then i have to add a alu/cooper parts between drivers and heatsink

But then you can also use BCP56 instead of BD139


Back to Ltspice :

i'm playing with SMD variant and with less current in input stage( ~1,6-1,8mA)

@ typical 68 Vpp
it is nearly similar to BC556/KSC variant
Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
1 1.000e+03 3.444e+01 1.000e+00 -0.13° 0.00°
2 2.000e+03 3.079e-04 8.940e-06 -96.95° -96.82°
3 3.000e+03 3.056e-04 8.871e-06 81.06° 81.18°
4 4.000e+03 5.917e-05 1.718e-06 177.05° 177.18°
5 5.000e+03 9.764e-05 2.835e-06 -95.13° -95.00°
6 6.000e+03 3.120e-05 9.059e-07 -176.98° -176.85°
7 7.000e+03 1.831e-05 5.315e-07 103.50° 103.62°
8 8.000e+03 2.736e-05 7.944e-07 -175.66° -175.53°
9 9.000e+03 9.386e-06 2.725e-07 113.80° 113.93°
Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.001309%(0.000000%)

28K | 680R | 15R


and also 9Vpp
Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
1 1.000e+03 4.386e+00 1.000e+00 -0.12° 0.00°
2 2.000e+03 1.114e-05 2.540e-06 -162.95° -162.83°
3 3.000e+03 1.534e-06 3.498e-07 136.12° 136.24°
4 4.000e+03 1.807e-06 4.119e-07 176.41° 176.53°
5 5.000e+03 9.182e-07 2.094e-07 159.43° 159.55°
6 6.000e+03 7.400e-07 1.687e-07 -179.93° -179.80°
7 7.000e+03 6.393e-07 1.458e-07 177.65° 177.78°
8 8.000e+03 5.509e-07 1.256e-07 -179.98° -179.86°
9 9.000e+03 4.949e-07 1.128e-07 -179.99° -179.87°
Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.000262%(0.000000%)
 

Attachments

  • to92+smd.png
    to92+smd.png
    38.2 KB · Views: 228
  • to126+smd.png
    to126+smd.png
    196.1 KB · Views: 214
Last edited:
first impressions of dual layout

SOT223 pin"4" is output of driver to gates
but at the moment i doesn't have an idea how to place ...

i will change the LED to SMD .. but this is important for resistor values for bias
so i will find a good red led with nearly stable Vfwd
 

Attachments

  • Unbenannt.png
    Unbenannt.png
    108.9 KB · Views: 194
I think i will use a smaller Pad with vias
In bottom Side there ist GND plane.
And i won't use 4layer PCB 😁

I will Doublecheck footprints and searching for suitable parts
Including a list.. (digikey/mouser)

But then i will Order parts.
So i have Something to do between 26.12. and 31.12 😁

Speakers are waiting of an amplifier....
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210403_192313567_HDR~2.jpg
    IMG_20210403_192313567_HDR~2.jpg
    408.5 KB · Views: 163
transfering .. yes . not so good as it is directly connected.
but in this way GND plane is only perforated ....

One negative Part of this is the capacity at the Gate drivers.
This Planes Creating a Cap.
 

Attachments

  • CFH11_v2_smd combo_PCB.PDF
    110.2 KB · Views: 104
  • CFH11_v2_smd combo_PCB_bot.PDF
    84.7 KB · Views: 100
Last edited:
Speakers are
Fountek Neo CD3.5H

Visaton BG20 modified
In a damped Open baffle
Back part is open Like a large variovent

Eminence Legend BP102 in a 2.1m TML

Design ist my own .. or i doesn't know If somewere build this in this way ��

Actually i'm using a China TPA3255 to Power the speakers.
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
I like TLs a lot but never considered the BP102 for a driver. Do you have simulations of the TL design? I am curious what the bass extension is. Most pro audio woofers like Legend don’t go that low. Highly sensitive though.

I have RS225-8 in a TL at present and it sounds superb. Using ScanSpeak 10F for midrange and highs.
More here:
10F/8424 & RS225-8 FAST / WAW Ref Monitor

Some variants possible with B80 as midtweeter like latest one by member Plott:
1000718d1638010198-10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor-psx_20211127_113955-jpg
 
updated version with dual parts ... THT and SMD

i will order 5 PCBs :)
 

Attachments

  • CFH11_1v2_combo.zip
    158.5 KB · Views: 83
  • CFH11_1v2.png
    CFH11_1v2.png
    149.3 KB · Views: 147
  • CFH11_1v2_PCB_BOT.PDF
    89.3 KB · Views: 99
  • CFH11_1v2_PCB_TOP.PDF
    100 KB · Views: 121
  • CFH11_1v2_PCB_Top+Bot.PDF
    150.9 KB · Views: 85
  • CFH11_1v2_SCH.PDF
    34.8 KB · Views: 434
  • CFH11-1v2.asc
    21.1 KB · Views: 118
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Nice work!

Question on schematic is why there are 22v Zener diodes on the front end rails? Was this meant to be a voltage regulator? It should be quiet (from cap Mx) but float up and down with the rails to allow relative operation over different rail voltages. The front end tends to need more voltage than the output stage if you wanted to give it its own PSU. I also see 6.3v rated caps on the front end.
 
yes
simulate it with different main supply voltage

problem is ... the current on input ( of about 1,8mA ) depends on main voltage
small changes on main supply resulting in small changes on the input current
and finally in large changes in VAS stage

this 22V zener is a bit more DIY friendly and more stable in this part

BIAS is a bit more stable between 40-55V supply voltage with this 22V zener
and with the 12Kohm resistor it is still quiet enough


on other hand .. if you don't want to use the Zener , you don't place it and use correct values for resistors ( ~24-28kOhm @50V )


voltage @ 2200µF is nearly the Vbe voltage
 
Last edited: