Can you tell original file from tube amp record? - test

Which file is the original and which do you prefer

  • Apricot is the original file

    Votes: 7 46.7%
  • Avocado is the original file

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • I prefer Apricot by listening

    Votes: 7 46.7%
  • I prefer Avocado by listening

    Votes: 7 46.7%

  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .
so what's up, how can i get positive results using more complex stimulis like apricot and avacado but can't distinguish any difference with flute and sine?

i've not substituted anything equipment wise and there's a picture of what i'm using to perform the test.

and the scotch doesn't seem to be a factor ( but i'll gladly volunteer for testing on that front! )
 
A friendly dig at Pano, he likes to measure stuff.
Which is funny because Earl Geddes has repeatedly criticized me for a "if I like it, then it's better" no measurement philosophy. Can't win. 😛

If I had measured before listening I would have bet against hearing a difference. But since Mooly and PMA had done so well on the sine, it was worth a try. No difference for me. I just now tired laptop speakers, still no difference. I do not hear the harmonic, or maybe I hear harmonics of the playback chain masking that of the file.
 
Hello i listened with audio-technica studio headphones and after with my nos dac and modulus 86 amp.

I prefer the avocado and maybe this is also the original file....

Voice seems better and theres is also difference in the begining with background info....
 
so what's up, how can i get positive results using more complex stimulis like apricot and avacado but can't distinguish any difference with flute and sine?

I think it might be the case of cheap PC speakers system? Quite often I had a feedback of listeners who used the cheapest equipment and reporting dramatic sound differences. To me, it indicated something wrong in the replay chain. Forget the flute test, I repeat it is indistinguishable. Concentrate on the sine test, it should bring a positive result.
 
If I had measured before listening I would have bet against hearing a difference. But since Mooly and PMA had done so well on the sine, it was worth a try. No difference for me. I just now tired laptop speakers, still no difference. I do not hear the harmonic, or maybe I hear harmonics of the playback chain masking that of the file.
It's a shame I can't prove I can hear a difference, I didn't expect to and am happy I can and so easily, I couldn't hear difference with laptop speakers, but headphones, no problem.
I think if I'd done ABX with the original test I would have failed, ie, I could be imagining the difference. The sine, there is no doubt at all, and, to be honest, I'm surprised some can't hear it and think there must be an explanation
 
Last edited:
It's odd isn't it 😉 Some can't hear differences that others hear plainly & yet all null results are considered as mounting evidence that there is no audible difference to be found - is it training, is it playback system, is it finding the right excerpt of the music track, is it something else - controls anyone?
 
There are so many variables (as above) that can affect the audibility of small differences in such listening tests that the only way I can think of to cover these issues is to include controls in the tests.

But this has been said many, many times already & yet these sort of tests still continue & results referred to as if they were a data point in discussions.