https://www.instagram.com/reel/CnPYhiIqf6B/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
this all works (offset driver entry at one third in a quarterwave (1 fourth) pipe where the exit and vent are in the same location or if you really want to exploit it, you fire into a parallel pipe from both ends using the same driver can you put the exit at the ’offset’ at 3x 1 fourth) as downstream ‘1/3’ ,).
It’s all the same. It’s all going for ‘ more‘using the math that allows it and it works every single time and it might be better than anything else because everything else is some sort of weird, distorted, compromise, or flare or taper shape that ultimately is simply another version of awkward?
I don’t know, but these things as perfect rectangles, as if they’re pieces of the inside of a telescope do the same exact thing they just don’t have the lens. Technically, they have instead, super position of wave shapes that land right on top of the next wave shape in exactly the same phase relationship from either side until ultimately, they don’t, which in this case is then at 5X, the fundamental.
this all works (offset driver entry at one third in a quarterwave (1 fourth) pipe where the exit and vent are in the same location or if you really want to exploit it, you fire into a parallel pipe from both ends using the same driver can you put the exit at the ’offset’ at 3x 1 fourth) as downstream ‘1/3’ ,).
It’s all the same. It’s all going for ‘ more‘using the math that allows it and it works every single time and it might be better than anything else because everything else is some sort of weird, distorted, compromise, or flare or taper shape that ultimately is simply another version of awkward?
I don’t know, but these things as perfect rectangles, as if they’re pieces of the inside of a telescope do the same exact thing they just don’t have the lens. Technically, they have instead, super position of wave shapes that land right on top of the next wave shape in exactly the same phase relationship from either side until ultimately, they don’t, which in this case is then at 5X, the fundamental.
Hey, i just found a disturbance in the resonator vortex that will break havoc exponentially on the up/downstream harmonics @1/4 wave of the fundamental and and 1/2 wave from the 3rd harmonic, as stated in the hellmontz/shultz white papers of 1941 ,
that can potentially unload the driver past XMech, destroying the coil in T minus10^9 Newtons,
BUT
unless you use a franken driver with >69 BL.
that design is a coldfusion reactor!
The culprit
those random zeta reticuli smugs spotted by the red arrows.
that can potentially unload the driver past XMech, destroying the coil in T minus10^9 Newtons,
BUT
unless you use a franken driver with >69 BL.
that design is a coldfusion reactor!
The culprit
those random zeta reticuli smugs spotted by the red arrows.
😝😝😝😝👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼💚💚💚
that mycelium and thc/cbd stylagtites. A few strands seem to influence low frequency response, and tickle the optic nerve, and the inner parts of the ear (same @ brain) into a resonating simultaneously.
once you make the connection that light and sound, are the same exact thing and apply the math to enclosure designs , it’ll becomes simple😝
it explains harmonic sequences(3:1 in particular and ‘ Bells theorum, all of Pythagoras , etc ) , and the relationship between the cone and rod in the optic nerve connection, as well as the Blindspot, and all kinds of things!!
that mycelium and thc/cbd stylagtites. A few strands seem to influence low frequency response, and tickle the optic nerve, and the inner parts of the ear (same @ brain) into a resonating simultaneously.
once you make the connection that light and sound, are the same exact thing and apply the math to enclosure designs , it’ll becomes simple😝
it explains harmonic sequences(3:1 in particular and ‘ Bells theorum, all of Pythagoras , etc ) , and the relationship between the cone and rod in the optic nerve connection, as well as the Blindspot, and all kinds of things!!
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
This is what is distracting me at the moment - a possible 6th order series-tuned bandpass alignment for the same driver. I figured out a way to lay out one that comes fairly close to a corresponding Hornresp sim. I haven't "tested" how well the Hornresp bandpass sims match corresponding builds, which is the main reason this is tempting me.So your last calculation is the one you will build?
Hello Brian,
I think it simulates the same way as the BPS1 below
https://freeloudspeakerplan.rf.gd/pages/bp6s1.htm
It's a serial connection anyway, and driver placement regarding the ducts are similar so the offset to position the driver doesn't look a problem.
I think it simulates the same way as the BPS1 below
https://freeloudspeakerplan.rf.gd/pages/bp6s1.htm
It's a serial connection anyway, and driver placement regarding the ducts are similar so the offset to position the driver doesn't look a problem.
Why is parallel so finicky and series so ‘easy/forgiving’ it seems?
Last edited by a moderator:
don't know, maybe due to visual impression, like illusionism.
What we see and the reality sometimes mismatch
What we see and the reality sometimes mismatch
Last edited by a moderator:
HAAA, We are touching quantum physics it seems.
Last edited by a moderator:
I meant acoustically as higher order or BP6 enclosures ?don't know, maybe due to visual impression, like illusionism.
What we see and the reality sometimes mismatch
If I’m not spot on with this little formula, I use to create the parallel qw versions(3:1 plus identical offsets ) , It immediately shows me a red flag of a phase discontinuity In the simulation tools(HR)
This is confusing me ? How’s it even possible to get those two acoustical lengths to line up to an odd harmonic(3Fb) … so its not terrible and without a smooth uninterrupted band with that doesn’t have a huge hiccup in it In the pressure phase discontinuity and cone flip flop? Some of the cancellation is left over some of the spike is that over excited and 1 million different things happen this area that are really bizarre if you listen to it.
an awkward, expanding path and a very large rear chamber. That’s far too short and really wide, and will have an akward ‘Q’ in the area bandwith that’s already gonna be weird as well.?
im stumped?
an awkward, expanding path and a very large rear chamber. That’s far too short and really wide, and will have an akward ‘Q’ in the area bandwith that’s already gonna be weird as well.?
im stumped?
Attachments
Last edited:
In the center opposed to each other (4 of them) . this is a ‘paraflex design, not mine
Attachments
Wtf? So it's not the published graph? The one they show don't have that disturbance in the force 🤣
ok it was this one
and yes the graph looks strange but i think is what it is with that driver
thing is that maybe that strange look on the graph will be not noticeable
https://www.facebook.com/100001682183048/videos/pcb.5315941771754240/619338769282642
and yes the graph looks strange but i think is what it is with that driver
thing is that maybe that strange look on the graph will be not noticeable
https://www.facebook.com/100001682183048/videos/pcb.5315941771754240/619338769282642
Last edited by a moderator:
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- Big, big TL...