Asynchronous I2S FIFO project, an ultimate weapon to fight the jitter

Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Clausen and JMD3254
I've discovered Ian's solutions, and sincerely I'm really happy of what I have built so far : it was easy and not so expensive compared to commercial streamer/dacs , and it really outperforms most of them. Thanks to Ian I have started a DAC in DIY mode... I would probably never have started without his products.
I concur 100%. I don't understand most of what I am doing, but I can read instructions. LOL My younger brother has a very high end system, and while he doesn't have a streamer I'm pretty confident my stuff rivals his, and he has a Sim Audio cd player/DAC, with Mark Levinson mono amps, and Dunlavy speakers. I built Joe Rasmussen's Elsinores, and they are pretty darn close to his Dunlavy's although I bet they would sound even better than his Dunlavy's if we did a straight swap, because everything else in his system is high end. He has a better pre-amp etc.

@Markw4 Most of what you're posting is going right over my head, but I'm loving your input anyway, and I don't think you've posted anything that could be construed to be stepping on Ian's toes. I think most of us in DIY who are like me, and all like sponges soaking up as much as we can. haha. Even if we don't understand everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MathieuDoe
am working on a streamer/dac in an empty Lumin S1 case, almost 8 kilograms of pure aluminum.
I don't have much space and it is only 4 cm high.
ES9038Q2M Dual Mono II, FifoPiMa, PurePi-ll 3.3v-5v, Transformer I/V.

just need a monitorPi pro screen in between....next week see if there is any sound coming out of it.
Finally, the power supply comes in an external cabinet with a nice cable with screw coupling.
 

Attachments

  • lumin MA.jpg
    lumin MA.jpg
    474.4 KB · Views: 112
  • lum.jpg
    lum.jpg
    314.6 KB · Views: 112
  • lumi.jpg
    lumi.jpg
    267.4 KB · Views: 112
Last edited:
Ian helped me fix my UCPure issue. The guy I bought it from sent me plastic nuts to use on the super caps, and turns out that was the problem. It was trying to go into "protection mode" to recharge the supercaps. I guess it was not making a good enough connection. In any case I went and bought steal bolts, and it's fixed. Here';s what it was doing. It was also "loosing" it's charge much faster before. It took a lot longer before it tried to go into recharge mode, and it switched back to "pure mode" just like Ian said, in only 2 or 3 minutes.

Here's the video I sent Ian.

 
  • Like
Reactions: MathieuDoe
Hi All, On the UCPure MkIII . there is a Fuse , I want to move the actual fuse to the rear panel , as replacing the fuse will be difficult as the board will be in an awkward position (did not think about this when designing the case (so many , so many mistakes🙁 )). Is this possible without causing any issues , The fuse with be about 4 inches away.
 

Attachments

  • UCPUREFUSE.jpg
    UCPUREFUSE.jpg
    402.7 KB · Views: 68
It was trying to go into "protection mode" to recharge the supercaps. I guess it was not making a good enough connection. I
Similar thing happened to my PurePi that uses lithium batteries underneath. The PurePi was clicked exactly like yours. I turns out that the batteries came loose and had to be pushed back up to make better contact. I was lifting and moving the dac around a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clausen
So I got my Receiver Pi DDC II today. Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to really use it yet, but I did get it working and tested. I want to use it with my Oppo 103 because I have a lot of concert DVDs and Blurays. I have a question for anyone my technical than I am. It's working with a RCA digital cable, but I can't get it to work with the HDMI. I checked the settings and made sure it's set to PCM for the HDMI out on the Oppo, but it doesn't "lock." It plays fine when I switch to RCA. Any ideas?
 
hi, I'm new here and starting a new build for a streamer+dac, based on Ian's parts, but I'm not sure which I/V stage to use.
regardless of price and complexity, how would you rate these options terms of sound quality:
1. OPA861
2. stock Transformer I/V with SQAUDIO DS2206
3. Transformer I/V kit with Lundahl 1544A
4. Transformer I/V kit with another transformer
5. Other?
 
hi, I'm new here and starting a new build for a streamer+dac, based on Ian's parts, but I'm not sure which I/V stage to use.
regardless of price and complexity, how would you rate these options terms of sound quality:
1. OPA861
2. stock Transformer I/V with SQAUDIO DS2206
3. Transformer I/V kit with Lundahl 1544A
4. Transformer I/V kit with another transformer
5. Other?
Hi,
Are you using balanced ou single ended outputs ?
In my case, I’m using SE. I have started with a OPA861 but I have discovered a bit too late that the SE outputs are not high end.

So I switched to I/V Lundahl 1544A and this is way better.

I will soon receive Ivan’s I/V board, so I will better able to compare. I am expecting a real gap.

If you are using balanced outputs, I think that you should try OPA861.
 
@danilog @MathieuDoe
In a dual mono DAC configuration utilizing two ESS chips, the architecture is optimized for balanced signal paths. When operating in single-ended mode, only one half of the DAC’s differential output is used, effectively bypassing the benefits of the dual-chip topology. This results in a suboptimal implementation where the full dynamic range and distortion performance of both DAC channels are not realized.

Introducing output transformers into the signal path places the system’s fidelity at the mercy of the transformer’s bandwidth and core material quality. Even high-end transformers typically exhibit a slight roll-off and phase shift below 100Hz, contributing to a minor but measurable reduction in bass extension and control. While negligible in systems with inherently strong low-frequency response, this may still affect overall tonal balance.

A more critical compromise with transformers in my experience, was the degradation of spatial characteristics—specifically, imaging precision and perceived depth.

Compared to a good active buffer stage like the OPA861. The transformer-coupled output lacked the same holographic rendering and separation

If you’re committed to single-ended—and I personally love and believe in single-ended for short runs (though that’s a topic of debate for another day)—I’d recommend going with a true single-ended DAC instead and No transformers, while still using the amazing streamers reclocker and power supplies that Ian designed.

Please note that this is my personal observation in my systems and others may vary.

Hope that helps
 
A more critical compromise with transformers in my experience, was the degradation of spatial characteristics—specifically, imaging precision and perceived depth.

Compared to a good active buffer stage like the OPA861. The transformer-coupled output lacked the same holographic rendering and separation

If you’re committed to single-ended—and I personally love and believe in single-ended for short runs (though that’s a topic of debate for another day)—I’d recommend going with a true single-ended DAC instead and No transformers, while still using the amazing streamers reclocker and power supplies that Ian designed.

Thank you Gabster for sharing your thoughts. This is very interesting.
So, what DAC and I/V conversion would your recommend to benefit of a high true single ended architecture on top of Ian's platform ?
I'm really attracted by holographic rendering, separation and depth...