I don't look at the empty spaces, rather at "the space" required by a wave, call it sinus or close or whatever. Empty spaces are more "occurences" to me here, whatever the reason.
2us reading (very approx again) gives 500kHz frequency, simple maths.
Should your unit (?) have identified 666kHz as frequency, then trust rather that figure than mine from a reading on a phone from work to the airport GLOL
My point was just to quickly question the mentioned 50kHz... I believe I see probs rather at 0,5MHz ish and 1MHz ish again.
Whatever, AmyAlice is your friend., that was the initial question, wasn't it?
Good luck
Claude
2us reading (very approx again) gives 500kHz frequency, simple maths.
Should your unit (?) have identified 666kHz as frequency, then trust rather that figure than mine from a reading on a phone from work to the airport GLOL
My point was just to quickly question the mentioned 50kHz... I believe I see probs rather at 0,5MHz ish and 1MHz ish again.
Whatever, AmyAlice is your friend., that was the initial question, wasn't it?
Good luck
Claude
Got it. As seen, yes, 0.5MHz (666kHz) and 5.1MHz emerges from 5us and 500ns respectively.
Diode Schottky Barrier SB140
If we suppose 1A current we have 0.4V drop and we can put up to 16 diodes in series.
But while I can reverse eng. your snap of datasheet, I'm not confident on the layout of the filter. I simply put 1~16 diodes in series, forward bias, on the positive terminal that go to Vin? Seems so.
Thanks guys
Last edited:
Don't know why you mention 5MHz, but just as a note 5us gives 200kHz rather than 500kHz.
I guess though you got the point somehow...
I guess though you got the point somehow...
Im referring to H time not the duration of the sinus.
Have you seen this image?
In 5us my DSO2512G says 666kHz
In 500ns it says 5.11Mhz
I got your point and obv is right. We need to suppress a noise of 666kHz, while we don't care if it appears every 4 squares ~20us (~50kHz inverter switching frequency).
It could be constant noise or 1 time per minute noise, but it is still 666kHz freq and that is what I aim to suppress.
But last measure at 500ns report 5.11MHz. Probably since the DSO can make more sampling and so seeing deeper in the wave. Or is it a resonant in the 666kHz wave?
Sorry for my newbie questions
Last edited:
A diode (and subsequent filter capacitances) removes the bottom half of the noise waveform. But you can only remove the bottom half once. After it's been removed you can't remove it again. So there's no noise removal benefit if you try adding a second or third or additional diode after the first one. Sixteen diodes is a bad idea.
Sixteen ferrite beads, in series, on the other hand . . . . I'll let people offer their own advice about that.
Sixteen ferrite beads, in series, on the other hand . . . . I'll let people offer their own advice about that.
I got it about diode, it is logic. I wansn't thinking about how it would operate. I missunderstood your "subsequent series filters" referring not to diodes but to LC or similar filters.
Since capacitor filter would also operate on bottom half wave, my last possibility is L filtering.
I investigated feedthru caps (never heard before) and C, LC, Pi, T versions.
In my case I could create it on 70mmq wire, stripping the pvc off (or using as cap insulator), putting an adequate insulator, and then an outer conductive layer, grounded (C type). Add 1 or 2 ferrite beads (LC, Pi or T type).
And so we are talking about ferrite beads (16 beads joke apart 😆 or are you serious?)
Can I wrap copper wire around the 70mmq wire and then ground (12V GND or even better EARTH) one ore both ends? It should act as a ferrite beads with the advantage of discharging to ground/earth.
And if I wrap and counter wrap with the same wire, then GND/EARTH?
I think I will experiment a bit.
Here a suggestion of a vendor of ferrite beads. Beads... beads everywhere
Diode doesn't work. Maybe is fake? It is from aliexpress.
0.1,1,10,100uF 1206 SMD parallels caps on Vin/GND of Arduino have not solved (shortest path possible).
Isolated optocoupled 7-80V AC/DC to 5VDC SOLVED the issue on Arduino side but OBV not the general ripple on 12V rails.
If I will build AmyAlice I will report my experince. Since that, thanks for support guys 🙂
I'm calling out on this assertion - forward biased diodes act rather like a low value resistance in parallel with substantial capacitance - not going to filter out RF much at all. RF switching with PIN diodes uses this property explicitly - forward biased acts as low-loss RF conductor, reverse bias acts as very small value capacitor (for a PIN structure at least). Ordinary PN diodes are similar but with higher off-capacitances and not very linear (with strong RF).
Filtering power lines is difficult partly because the impedance is ill-defined and probably changing, and also because most magnetic materials saturate readily reducing their effectiveness in chokes/inductors when under load. A ferrite bead rated at say 300 ohms at 100MHz with a max current of 5A may only have 50 ohms of loss at that full current...
You want high values of capacitance with low ESL to shunt, and high values of broad-band inductance with low ESR / and low leakage capacitance and high saturation currents to be in series... And hopefully there is somewhere for the noise energy to dissipate as quality C and L only push the noise elsewhere rather than absorb the energy. It takes effort to do a good job as this thread testifies...
Over time things will be easier as SMPS's are going up in frequency as technology advances, making their artifacts easier to filter with smaller filter components. Hopefully it means more SMPS's which are low noise out of the box, needing no external filtering.
Filtering power lines is difficult partly because the impedance is ill-defined and probably changing, and also because most magnetic materials saturate readily reducing their effectiveness in chokes/inductors when under load. A ferrite bead rated at say 300 ohms at 100MHz with a max current of 5A may only have 50 ohms of loss at that full current...
You want high values of capacitance with low ESL to shunt, and high values of broad-band inductance with low ESR / and low leakage capacitance and high saturation currents to be in series... And hopefully there is somewhere for the noise energy to dissipate as quality C and L only push the noise elsewhere rather than absorb the energy. It takes effort to do a good job as this thread testifies...
Over time things will be easier as SMPS's are going up in frequency as technology advances, making their artifacts easier to filter with smaller filter components. Hopefully it means more SMPS's which are low noise out of the box, needing no external filtering.