I'll get some pictures tomorrow, no I use them from bass up.Any chance of seeing close up pictures of the exciter panel back and front ?
And how they were made.
And you only use them for the midrange?
Steve.
I think many years back one of the designers came on to the site(can't remember which)and told the story of the design and how the vast amounts of money disappeared .Never heard of that one before. Thanks for sharing the link.
It's interesting that they seem to suggesting that it's based on travelling waves (pebble in a pond) rather than standing waves, but give no mention of how or if they have any features to prevent reflections.
Do you know if they have any patents or other literature that gives more details?
Eric
They thew vast amounts of money at this project.
Should have stuck with dml.
Steve.
No bass, not measured them but got to be hitting 40hz .Herb777.
Do you mean lower midrange?
What frequency do you XO.
Steve.
I know I have posted the response of the 6mm panel before showing the hump below 100hz and the excellent response above up to and beyond 20k.
I was just holding the microphone at about half a metre in front of the panel.
Not bad for a 2ft panel with an exciter glued on and nothing else done to it.
Easy peasy.
Steve.
I was just holding the microphone at about half a metre in front of the panel.
Not bad for a 2ft panel with an exciter glued on and nothing else done to it.
Easy peasy.
Steve.
Attachments
Wow, haha, you are right, DPK really does claim that:
View attachment 1127789
I'm skeptical, I must admit.
I hate to risk going down this sketchy rabbit hole any farther, but my curiosity has the better of me. So can anybody translate this figure?
- the Karavashkin papers read like pseudoscience to me. And the SELF laboratory seems sketchy at least.
- I had the impression that the DPK speaker was based on the Herger patent. Is that correct? And if so, whey didn't it mention this hitherto unstudied phenomenon, if it's so basic to the function of this speaker?
Eric
View attachment 1127794
Well, Danilo Herger uses that sketch in his patent. He actually mentions Karavashkin "thesis" in his patent,
The "thesis" that was missing in the internet, but the working link was given to us by @Alvipet in this post #8,175. Maybe, he'd know the answer to your question. If you revisit the post #8,192 and watch the video, you might decide to ask or not.
Here is the US application of the said patent.
Anyway, I am not pursuing that matter anymore.
Last edited:
Further to post #8,248,
here is the US application of the Herger patent on the exciter used in the patent above. It is being filed worldwide.
If I find more info I'll post them, but won't analyse their scientific values.
here is the US application of the Herger patent on the exciter used in the patent above. It is being filed worldwide.
If I find more info I'll post them, but won't analyse their scientific values.
Last edited:
Did you see the video I posted? Recorded via my phone so not the best quality, but with headphones you get a better idea. In my room at the moment I've also got some markaudio MS 11 fullrange drivers in a MTL cabinet, both speakers are hooked up to a sansui 505 amp which has twin speaker hook up and a speaker A and speaker B switch, so you can flick between speakers on the fly. I much prefer my panels.Thank you herb777 , I will be interested to see your pictures.
Steve.
Yes I did listen to your video, not a carpet in sight 😁Did you see the video I posted? Recorded via my phone so not the best quality, but with headphones you get a better idea. In my room at the moment I've also got some markaudio MS 11 fullrange drivers in a MTL cabinet, both speakers are hooked up to a sansui 505 amp which has twin speaker hook up and a speaker A and speaker B switch, so you can flick between speakers on the fly. I much prefer my panels.
At last We are getting some nice recordings of different types of panels .
Hopefully there will be more ?
I could see what looked like a grey disk in the Middle of the wood panel and presumed it was the dml ,bendingwave panel ?
Steve.
Looks like someone is trying to reinvent the wheel.Wow, haha, you are right, DPK really does claim that:
View attachment 1127789
I'm skeptical, I must admit.
I hate to risk going down this sketchy rabbit hole any farther, but my curiosity has the better of me. So can anybody translate this figure?
- the Karavashkin papers read like pseudoscience to me. And the SELF laboratory seems sketchy at least.
- I had the impression that the DPK speaker was based on the Herger patent. Is that correct? And if so, whey didn't it mention this hitherto unstudied phenomenon, if it's so basic to the function of this speaker?
Eric
View attachment 1127794
A rose by any other name ,would smell as sweet !
Steve.
Paper would probably match the efficiency and sound of eps.Herb777 said "low to midrange". and the ribbon tweeter is used for the highs.
I also tried using a tweeter in fact I bought around 7 different tweeters just to try out including a ribbon and I did not prefer any of them.
Tweeters I've tried> Mylar dome, Soft dome, ribbon, copper/berylium coated , paper cone, polycarbonate and titanium.
Out of all those tweeters the cheapest tweeter which is the paper cone at around 3 bucks each sounded the best with my DML panels. Second best and cheap is the Mylar. Which got me thinking of the Melior 1 DML panels made of Mylar sheet.
http://www.museatex.com/planar1.htm
I did have some experience with thin film , it was OK at low levels but as soon as I turned the volume up it went to pieces.
It was a nightmare ,so moved on.
Steve
I've been experimenting with holes of different sizes and placement around the panels, that circle you can see is one of the cutouts, nothing scientific 😄 just playing.Yes I did listen to your video, not a carpet in sight 😁
At last We are getting some nice recordings of different types of panels .
Hopefully there will be more ?
I could see what looked like a grey disk in the Middle of the wood panel and presumed it was the dml ,bendingwave panel ?
Steve.
You can watch the "reinvented wheel" in this post #8,192 🙂 And, listen to the sound.Looks like someone is trying to reinvent the wheel.
A rose by any other name ,would smell as sweet !
Steve.
Related to US20220345823A1 and US20220345825A1
Last edited:
I'm not sure, but I think the penny has dropped?Wow, haha, you are right, DPK really does claim that:
View attachment 1127789
I'm skeptical, I must admit.
I hate to risk going down this sketchy rabbit hole any farther, but my curiosity has the better of me. So can anybody translate this figure?
- the Karavashkin papers read like pseudoscience to me. And the SELF laboratory seems sketchy at least.
- I had the impression that the DPK speaker was based on the Herger patent. Is that correct? And if so, whey didn't it mention this hitherto unstudied phenomenon, if it's so basic to the function of this speaker?
Eric
View attachment 1127794
This is similar to a piezoelectric bending driver ,but with more force.
The 1 and 2 positions on the panel surface are two exciter positions.
Out of phase with each other, if mounted rigidly to a back brace ,they will force a bend in the panel as in the picture , causing a wave.
Let me know what you think.
Steve.
Interesting. Thanks for pointing that out. When I said that the "transverse gas wave" concept was not mentioned in the Herger patent, I was referring to this one (filed 6/2020):Well, Danilo Herger uses that sketch in his patent. He actually mentions Karavashkin "thesis" in his patent,
https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2743892C1/en
which still does not mention it as far as I can tell. But as you point out, indeed it is mentioned in this other one filed just two months later:
https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2744773C1/en
Curiously, the two patents describe pretty much the same exact features, but only the second one mentions the significance of the "Karavashkin transverse gas waves". Patent strategy can be confusion, but I have to wonder if they figured it would be unlikely to be granted in the US or Europe in the original form, but then somebody had the idea to toss in the Karavashkin "thesis". Regardless of how dubious the thesis is, they thought it might be worth a shot.
Eric
Im confident that Mr Karavashkin’s works are not merely pseudoscience, but a hoax. And I’m confident that Mr Alvipet and Mr chdsl (possibly the same person) know that already. If you get him excited, Mr chdsl lapses into Russian speech forms.Wow, haha, you are right, DPK really does claim that:
View attachment 1127789
I'm skeptical, I must admit.
I hate to risk going down this sketchy rabbit hole any farther, but my curiosity has the better of me. So can anybody translate this figure?
- the Karavashkin papers read like pseudoscience to me. And the SELF laboratory seems sketchy at least.
- I had the impression that the DPK speaker was based on the Herger patent. Is that correct? And if so, whey didn't it mention this hitherto unstudied phenomenon, if it's so basic to the function of this speaker?
Eric
View attachment 1127794
The thing is there are 4 Herger Russian patents, and 4 equivalent US patent applications. It takes time to find these out.Interesting. Thanks for pointing that out. When I said that the "transverse gas wave" concept was not mentioned in the Herger patent, I was referring to this one (filed 6/2020):
https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2743892C1/en
which still does not mention it as far as I can tell. But as you point out, indeed it is mentioned in this other one filed just two months later:
https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2744773C1/en
Curiously, the two patents describe pretty much the same exact features, but only the second one mentions the significance of the "Karavashkin transverse gas waves". Patent strategy can be confusion, but I have to wonder if they figured it would be unlikely to be granted in the US or Europe in the original form, but then somebody had the idea to toss in the Karavashkin "thesis". Regardless of how dubious the thesis is, they thought it might be worth a shot.
Eric
Steve,I'm not sure, but I think the penny has dropped?
This is similar to a piezoelectric bending driver ,but with more force.
The 1 and 2 positions on the panel surface are two exciter positions.
Out of phase with each other, if mounted rigidly to a back brace ,they will force a bend in the panel as in the picture , causing a wave.
Let me know what you think.
Steve.
Can you clarify what you believe you now understand but previously didn't? Are you talking about this transverse gas wave concept, or something else?
I do agree that two exciters out of phase would create bending moments, that would be different and perhaps stronger for at least some frequencies than a single exciter. But neither of the Herger patents specify that two exciters are necessary, let alone that when two are used they are run out of phase.
When they talk about "antiphase" components, I read it as referring to this type of thing, which happens in a DML regardless of how many exciters there are:
Are you thinking something different?
Eric
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- A Study of DMLs as a Full Range Speaker