The M2 Output Stage in Class A/B, and maybe a Power WHAMMY?

Next Part is with 1.51A bias
IMG_20231014_174355.jpg
IMG_20231014_174415.jpg
IMG_20231014_185119.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
If it is indeed FQH44N10-F133, then it is not very complementary to the FQA9P25.
For one it has lower Vgs at the same current, but also higher capacitances (especially for a NMOS).
Rthjc is the same at 0.83°C/W, which means that it is not different from the Toshiba's ad the IRFP's in terms of power handling.

How it sounds or measures, you have to judge / find out.
You would need to measure distortion at 2.8Vrms into 8R, at 1kHz and 10kHz (if possible).

The previous test was done with FQA10N80C/9P25. Not really better than old faithful IRFP240/9240.
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/complementary-power-mosfets.378024/post-6889027

For a prototype build, any MOSFET combination in TO3P / TO247 package is fine.


Patrick
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Hi Patrick.
Thanks.
I know that these mosfet are not symmetrical because of the different transx. I know it from my M 2. Late they are splitting their power. But in the areas where we use them its not so so relevant. Because we use them Just at 1...2 A. So the trancx is Not so huge.

Not? Is thatNonsens?
Kr chris
 
Last edited: