Since you are using 3D printing, I have a suggestion for increase the panel's rigidity: Is it possible to add some carbon fiber tubes on the backside of the panel?
I will try to explain the idea: it would require designing an X format tube guide on the backside of the panel, maybe with a 2mm diameter, so you can fill it with epoxy resin, inserting an 1mm diameter carbon rod.
The epoxi will be glued to each layer of the printing hole, and it may require some marks on the carbon rod to improve adhesion. It would be like an skeleton, that can also be made inside the panel if you want.
I have nooo idea if this has already been tried or suggested on this huge thread.
I will try to explain the idea: it would require designing an X format tube guide on the backside of the panel, maybe with a 2mm diameter, so you can fill it with epoxy resin, inserting an 1mm diameter carbon rod.
The epoxi will be glued to each layer of the printing hole, and it may require some marks on the carbon rod to improve adhesion. It would be like an skeleton, that can also be made inside the panel if you want.
I have nooo idea if this has already been tried or suggested on this huge thread.
Surely it depends on what EPS one is using and what skin...what grades have you tried, and do they all sound good to you?Leob.
You made a comment earlier about using a thin skin on low grade eps .
I only use a very thin mix of 50x50 pva and water, this does sink into the eps a little and creates a hard surface but is incredibly light when all the water evaporates.
As for gluing a hard skin on to the eps, yes this would work , but it is not something I would do personally as this would loose so much of the sound I love from my eps panels.
The applied skins would dominate the sound of eps, and rob the panel of minute detail ,which is what I love about eps.
Xps would be a better candidate for this I believe , and would benefit from the harder skin, as I have found using epoxy.
DML is very complicated, that is why I prefer to use the old name, soundboard.
You vibrate the panel to make sound, the panel material will have its characteristic sound, which can be manipulated and controlled.
What methods are used would depend on the use for the panel and the sound preferred.
I know it is very simplistic attitude but it works for me and has helped me understand dml better.
Steve.
Have you tried the epoxy on EPS as well? If so, how does the efficiency of a untreated and epoxy coated EPS panel differ?
Interesting idea, but I don't think it will work out. 1mm is very tick. Having a 0.2 layer instead of a 0.1mm really degrades efficiency, so adding 1mm rods and additional epoxy will probably not give great results.Since you are using 3D printing, I have a suggestion for increase the panel's rigidity: Is it possible to add some carbon fiber tubes on the backside of the panel?
I will try to explain the idea: it would require designing an X format tube guide on the backside of the panel, maybe with a 2mm diameter, so you can fill it with epoxy resin, inserting an 1mm diameter carbon rod.
The epoxi will be glued to each layer of the printing hole, and it may require some marks on the carbon rod to improve adhesion. It would be like an skeleton, that can also be made inside the panel if you want.
I have nooo idea if this has already been tried or suggested on this huge thread.
In that case, gluing on thin carbon sheet would probably be better, but then I think you should skip the plastic skin altogether...and if you are already spending on the carbon you might as well glue it onto nomex core instead I guess.
Leob.
On pages 171 to 173 there is a selection of panel recordings from eps to types of canvas panel.
You can use your own judgment as to how good they sound, taking into consideration the problems recording on my phone in a junk filled room and then having to load to my computer and convert to another format 😬
there is also a picture of my hd grade eps panel.
further back I did see a photo of an hd eps panel with a thin sheet of ali glued onto one side, this was enough to totally kill the sound of the eps panel !
steve.
On pages 171 to 173 there is a selection of panel recordings from eps to types of canvas panel.
You can use your own judgment as to how good they sound, taking into consideration the problems recording on my phone in a junk filled room and then having to load to my computer and convert to another format 😬
there is also a picture of my hd grade eps panel.
further back I did see a photo of an hd eps panel with a thin sheet of ali glued onto one side, this was enough to totally kill the sound of the eps panel !
steve.
Junk filled room should be better than an empty room at least!Leob.
On pages 171 to 173 there is a selection of panel recordings from eps to types of canvas panel.
You can use your own judgment as to how good they sound, taking into consideration the problems recording on my phone in a junk filled room and then having to load to my computer and convert to another format 😬
there is also a picture of my hd grade eps panel.
further back I did see a photo of an hd eps panel with a thin sheet of ali glued onto one side, this was enough to totally kill the sound of the eps panel !
steve.
Very interesting with the dome solutions. I think I will look in to that more to that when I come to a tweaking phase. First I want to get an idea about the thickness, density and dimensions.
I'm thinking about the EPS with hard skin also because that is easy to find in small amounts. The high grade is only available in bulk here. Of course it cannot be any skin, and perhaps skin will influence sound more than the EPS.
Not sure what could work though. Only epoxy, or epoxy with some fibres...or perhaps something like mylar?
Hi Steve, how is these new canvas panels playing/sounding ..Last night I glued the 6x4 ply panel back onto my canvas panel for comparisons with the new panel I will be making.
I'm busy today so this will give the panel time to dry properly before testing it , to see if it is ok ?
I might have to coat the front with some pva to fill in the cracks in the cascamite ?
Steve.
Leob,I agree, more actual observations than my uninformed ramblings 🙂 I just thought the distinction that was expressed was interesting, because in my mind resonance was resonance.
The 6mm plate will take a while to print and take a lot of material, but I have the 1mm and 3.8mm ready now with exciters mounted.
Size of the plates are 295x205mm, and the 1mm plate weighs 36g, and the 3.8mm 76.3g.
Both plates have one 0.1 layer at the bottom, which is the side the exciter is fixed on. The infill is 17% honeycomb, and at the top I have 3 layers a 0.1mm each. These settings was pushing it with the BioFusion filament, and the surface at the top didn't become fully solid everywhere, and little bit came off at the bottom of the 3.8mm getting stuck to the glass as I removed the plate. But it was the settings I found best for for the carbon filament, so used the same for these plates.
The extrusion with is 0.6 mm as nozzle size, but infill has 50% extrusion.
This is the 3.8 mm plate during printing to give you an idea about the structure:
View attachment 1032361
Also you can see the thick walls. I added those for some damping. Maybe not ideal from a efficiency standpoint, but seems like some damping will smoothen the FR and reduce ringing, and I'm planning to tie it in all 4 corner mounts only for suspension.
First of all which is louder?
Using "check levels" before measuring the FR in REW, the noise registers as 93dB for the 1mm plate and 99dB for the 3.8mm. So as expected the ticker plate is loudest despite having double the mass.
Since this material is not that stiff to start with, the 1mm plate is very bendy though, and wobbles as you wave it in the air. The 3.8mm is fairly stiff, and takes some actual force to bend it.
When it comes to FR, the 1mm is surprisingly close I would say...it feels so flimsy that I expected it to be a disaster. Actually it is, but because it distorts badly in the low mids, more on that later...
First I measured with them just hanging from strings, with orange being the 3.8mm and turquoise the 1mm:
View attachment 1032363
The bass response is stronger with the thin plate, but some strong modes in the low mids makes the 3.8mm win in peak SPL.
To drift away in speculations a bit, this kind of response is what I seen before that makes me think why the thickness tends to push up those modes in particular. The lower bass frequencies depend more on pure wave bending of the plane, and hence become louder with the thinner plate. But the lack of body means weaker modes in the mids. That's my hypothesis anyway and I'm sticking with it! 😉
The plan is like I said to actually suspend from all four corner mounts, and to emulate that I pulled slightly at the bottom corner mounts while doing the test (orange 3.8mm and green 1mm):
View attachment 1032367
We see that the bass response especially becomes smoother, and is much more similar for both plates. It makes sense if the damping constricts the planar wave motion, but we still see those mid peaks in the 3.8mm, and they don't seem to be much affected by damping the boundaries. This does seem to indicate that there are different principles at play here in different parts of the spectrum.
However, like mentioned before the 1mm distorts badly in the low mids. I'm not sure why that is, but think I want to revise the process and see if that can be fixed by printing the top layer separately and glue or iron it on. Improving on the 1mm plate might help improving the thicker plates as well.
Thank you for this pictures and the FR.
My comments/questions :
- The HF roll off : you have already answered suspecting some limitation in the measurement chain.
- Is there really a 6dB difference in efficiency? The 3.8mm (orange) curve is above in some regions but they are really very similar. You might use a 5dB scale to have a better view. No need to show FR on a 140dB span.
- The bass roll off are very similar despite the difference of mass and stiffness... like if another parameter like defines the limitation. The bass roll off of a panel in room remains quite high in my list of questions about DML
What is the distance panel/mic in your measurements?
Christian
If you want some good ideas to calibrate in level or check a mic response (ie in HF) : mic calibration thread gives some good ideas and links.
Christian
Christian
Leon.
I have been recommending a 50x50 pva and water mix for eps skins for over 10years now , and have not as yet found a better substitute.
although the guy that designed the pink panel for parts express recommend my 50x50 mix for xps ,I'm not sure that would have been my choice,but I suppose it does help a little, eps and xps are not the same and I believe shouldn't be treated the same.
as for epoxy on eps , the little bit I test coated didn't turn out as expected, I was expecting it to be harder than the pva.
The epoxy doesn't seem to sink into the eps like the pva , and feels quite soft and flexible when pressed and tapped?
The pva feels harder and sounds harder, I was expecting the opposite ?
Epoxy would be my choice for xps , as it seems to give the xps a more glassy sound but without the excessive rigidity and weight.
Life is full of surprises.
But until I or anyone else applies epoxy to the whole of an eps panel I can't be certain how it will sound.
The hd grades of eps by the way have no problems reaching 20k similar to ply, but as you say are hard to get hold of without buying in bulk.
Steve
I have been recommending a 50x50 pva and water mix for eps skins for over 10years now , and have not as yet found a better substitute.
although the guy that designed the pink panel for parts express recommend my 50x50 mix for xps ,I'm not sure that would have been my choice,but I suppose it does help a little, eps and xps are not the same and I believe shouldn't be treated the same.
as for epoxy on eps , the little bit I test coated didn't turn out as expected, I was expecting it to be harder than the pva.
The epoxy doesn't seem to sink into the eps like the pva , and feels quite soft and flexible when pressed and tapped?
The pva feels harder and sounds harder, I was expecting the opposite ?
Epoxy would be my choice for xps , as it seems to give the xps a more glassy sound but without the excessive rigidity and weight.
Life is full of surprises.
But until I or anyone else applies epoxy to the whole of an eps panel I can't be certain how it will sound.
The hd grades of eps by the way have no problems reaching 20k similar to ply, but as you say are hard to get hold of without buying in bulk.
Steve
Sarathssca.
ooops sorry, I keep moving from one panel project to another ,I need to focus on one and not get side tracked.
I have been listening to the cracked cascamite art panel and it seems to be playing ok .
Thanks for reminding me, I need a little prod now and then to keep me moving .
I've been playing around with the 1mm veneer and epoxy panel trying to improve the sound, which has been interesting if a little annoying, but seems to work well playing along side the art panel.
The idea was for my next art panel was to cut the hole in the ply panel before gluing it to the canvas and leave the canvas intact.
Depending on how this goes I might then cut out the canvas in the centre of the coil area and attach a fabric dome, we shall see ?
The idea of the dome is to improve some of the detail in the ply and canvas panel and to sort out exciter problems.
Steve
ooops sorry, I keep moving from one panel project to another ,I need to focus on one and not get side tracked.
I have been listening to the cracked cascamite art panel and it seems to be playing ok .
Thanks for reminding me, I need a little prod now and then to keep me moving .
I've been playing around with the 1mm veneer and epoxy panel trying to improve the sound, which has been interesting if a little annoying, but seems to work well playing along side the art panel.
The idea was for my next art panel was to cut the hole in the ply panel before gluing it to the canvas and leave the canvas intact.
Depending on how this goes I might then cut out the canvas in the centre of the coil area and attach a fabric dome, we shall see ?
The idea of the dome is to improve some of the detail in the ply and canvas panel and to sort out exciter problems.
Steve
Last edited:
I just re -read your post and though how similar we seem.Steve, Thank You for your reply.
The Material in the link is a similar material, the material I have access to comes in a pale grey colour, and is looking like it has a resistance to the ribs collapsing, as I have seen quite substantial weight point loading onto it.
I also have unlimited access to a material produced in the same form, but it is about as strong a Corrugated Cardboard, which makes the properties a much less rigid structure, the Brand of this is usually referred to as Correx or Cordek.
I am an audio minded person, and have no concerns about producing structures to work with my interests, it is the EE side where I stumble.
I am a child from the time of HiFi World DIY Supplements and have through these influences created a long history of taking part in Enthusiast Events, Commercial Events and General HiFi visits to the homes of other enthusiasts and EE's who produce bespoke equipment.
Your description of this Speaker Design and how these Speakers can present is even more fuel to my interest, I can't but help feel, a solution has been discovered that will be more than satisfactory and allow for the producing of an Audio set up in the Main Living area that does not present itself in a manner that will be easily identified as an audio system.
My wife knows from prior experiences if she accepts a conventional HiFi System, it won't be long before the room is overwhelmed with HiFi devices.
I am keen to purchase the exciters, preferably ones that are suitable for all types of panel produced.
I am also keen to learn of the assembly of a panel techniques, as I will start with a small panel to be used and then at a later date an alternative panel will be used when established back in the home.
I ment to reply sooner.
I still have a pile of hifi world diy supplements under my bed and I built the 20watt valve amp, which I still have , but I need to undo some mods I made to it, which were probably a waste of time !
I had to move out of the front room into the garage as my wife couldn't stand all the wires and experimenting I was doing .
I think the final straw was when she found her Le creuset set propped up about 6ft in the air on poles,used as enclosures for bandor drive units , she wasn't a happy bunny 🐇.
as it happens , moving out and converting the garage into a music room was a great idea, I can play my music as loud as I like without being told to turn it down.
accept for the time she came into my room at about 2am saying she could feel the bed moving across the room, and shouting, turn it down !!!
Happy days.
are you still going to try those panels you mentioned, to see how they sound ?
It would be interesting to know.
Steve.
I don't suspect the HF roll off is a measurement issue. I'm just careful drawing to much conclusions about the details in the HF response with a cheap mic. The overall slope seems correct to my ears at least, and the printed plastic is a bit duller than the cardboard and PC.Leob,
Thank you for this pictures and the FR.
My comments/questions :
I had a quick test today with a 20x30cm piece of XPS 9mm (probably Depron) to have an idea to what happens with a panel of the dimensions you have. The measure was at 50cm. The bass roll off is less stiff. I went back in my measurement records and see the same material in a larger panel 60x80cm shown a bass roll off similar to yours but starting even higher in frequency.
- The HF roll off : you have already answered suspecting some limitation in the measurement chain.
- Is there really a 6dB difference in efficiency? The 3.8mm (orange) curve is above in some regions but they are really very similar. You might use a 5dB scale to have a better view. No need to show FR on a 140dB span.
- The bass roll off are very similar despite the difference of mass and stiffness... like if another parameter like defines the limitation. The bass roll off of a panel in room remains quite high in my list of questions about DML
What is the distance panel/mic in your measurements?
Christian
I was surprised how close the graphs where after doing the noise measurement, so redid it a couple of times with same result. Indeed I should zoom more. The difference in the graph is 10dB in several places, and perhaps comparing noise and a sweep is not really the same? Can try to do a FR with noise and see if it makes a difference.
Here is the dampened version with more zoom
Indeed bass response is quite similar. It is more uneven in the thinner plate, but that can be the distortion messing up the graph as well. But if anything is tied to mass it is not obvious in the bass region, and the flexibility of the plate seems the most critical factor.
I don't have much experience with epoxy, but there are quite many different types. The one used for making carbon laminates should be worth trying...should be quite hard without the carbon I would have thought.Leon.
I have been recommending a 50x50 pva and water mix for eps skins for over 10years now , and have not as yet found a better substitute.
although the guy that designed the pink panel for parts express recommend my 50x50 mix for xps ,I'm not sure that would have been my choice,but I suppose it does help a little, eps and xps are not the same and I believe shouldn't be treated the same.
as for epoxy on eps , the little bit I test coated didn't turn out as expected, I was expecting it to be harder than the pva.
The epoxy doesn't seem to sink into the eps like the pva , and feels quite soft and flexible when pressed and tapped?
The pva feels harder and sounds harder, I was expecting the opposite ?
Epoxy would be my choice for xps , as it seems to give the xps a more glassy sound but without the excessive rigidity and weight.
Life is full of surprises.
But until I or anyone else applies epoxy to the whole of an eps panel I can't be certain how it will sound.
The hd grades of eps by the way have no problems reaching 20k similar to ply, but as you say are hard to get hold of without buying in bulk.
Steve
Sarathssca.
My wife is in London today, church watching ? so I will be able to make up the art panel, which will not take long, I should be able to have a listen tomorrow.
I'm just going to drill the hole in the ply and glue the panel and exciter to the canvas using neat pva.
Just to start with and see how that sounds.
It's as easy as that.
I will be making comparisons with the cascamite panel and the canvas only panel with dome.
Maybe I should set up these two panels today and get used to the sound a little ,to help with comparisons tomorrow.
Thanks again , for reminding me.
Steve.
My wife is in London today, church watching ? so I will be able to make up the art panel, which will not take long, I should be able to have a listen tomorrow.
I'm just going to drill the hole in the ply and glue the panel and exciter to the canvas using neat pva.
Just to start with and see how that sounds.
It's as easy as that.
I will be making comparisons with the cascamite panel and the canvas only panel with dome.
Maybe I should set up these two panels today and get used to the sound a little ,to help with comparisons tomorrow.
Thanks again , for reminding me.
Steve.
While I was setting up the art panel I suddenly remembered that my next test set-up I was planning was going to be with the panel on the front as in the picture.
I'm in a bit of a quandary as to which to go for.
the idea was to try and get a little more detail from the ply on the front side and maybe cutting a larger area of canvas at the back for less damping ?
it doesn't look too bad , in fact I like the look.
I will only have one panel left to experiment with after this panel .
I got the four panels very cheaply in a 4 pack .
Mmmmmm.
Steve.
I'm in a bit of a quandary as to which to go for.
the idea was to try and get a little more detail from the ply on the front side and maybe cutting a larger area of canvas at the back for less damping ?
it doesn't look too bad , in fact I like the look.
I will only have one panel left to experiment with after this panel .
I got the four panels very cheaply in a 4 pack .
Mmmmmm.
Steve.
Attachments
Ok , I've made up my mind, I've glued the ply to the front of the canvas panel but without the hole for the dome, but I've cut a hole in the canvas so that the exciter will mount directly on to the ply.
This is going to take a lot longer now as I have to wait for the canvas to dry before gluing the exciter on.
I've placed weights on the canvas and ply to keep it flat and stop it bubbling.
Steve.
This is going to take a lot longer now as I have to wait for the canvas to dry before gluing the exciter on.
I've placed weights on the canvas and ply to keep it flat and stop it bubbling.
Steve.
Attachments
Leob,I don't suspect the HF roll off is a measurement issue. I'm just careful drawing to much conclusions about the details in the HF response with a cheap mic. The overall slope seems correct to my ears at least, and the printed plastic is a bit duller than the cardboard and PC.
I was surprised how close the graphs where after doing the noise measurement, so redid it a couple of times with same result. Indeed I should zoom more. The difference in the graph is 10dB in several places, and perhaps comparing noise and a sweep is not really the same? Can try to do a FR with noise and see if it makes a difference.
Here is the dampened version with more zoom
View attachment 1032830
Indeed bass response is quite similar. It is more uneven in the thinner plate, but that can be the distortion messing up the graph as well. But if anything is tied to mass it is not obvious in the bass region, and the flexibility of the plate seems the most critical factor.
What is the distance mic/panel in your measurements?
Hi Steve
I have a sample of the material you have inquired about on my work desk, It is extremely robust and resilient to compression with walls and ribs less that 1mm in thickness, I assume the material has a hardness produced to take the impact of heavy plant and point loading.
I just have to request for the permission to take a few full sheets home with myself, this will give me a base material that can be tried in different thicknesses and possibly even a Two Ply Lamination and to keep the contact between surfaces quite tight, use 0.8mm thick double sided Teflon tape as the bonding material.
As said I can make some of this available to be trialled, I'm sure I could package a few 400mm x 400mm 'ish' Panels to be posted, if my weekly Journey's are not passing local to an interested party.
I am also keen to try out a Natural Product and Canvas is very attractive, especially after hearing recordings on this Thread with it used as the DPS.
There is one more itch to scratch for a use of a Natural Material and that will be a very thin wood material with a soaking of Shellac, as I have seen in other threads where damping is a required property for a material that a Shellac Soak Coating can enhance the measurements recorded for damping and dissipation of a material.
Shellac is as Natural as it gets, as it is produced from secretions from the Lac Beetle insect, it is very stable and long lasting.
It also has very minimum elastic properties and is resistant to UV break down.
Most importantly, and to really get the party going, Is there any 'Exciters' I could purchase from a UK members redundant parts?
I have a sample of the material you have inquired about on my work desk, It is extremely robust and resilient to compression with walls and ribs less that 1mm in thickness, I assume the material has a hardness produced to take the impact of heavy plant and point loading.
I just have to request for the permission to take a few full sheets home with myself, this will give me a base material that can be tried in different thicknesses and possibly even a Two Ply Lamination and to keep the contact between surfaces quite tight, use 0.8mm thick double sided Teflon tape as the bonding material.
As said I can make some of this available to be trialled, I'm sure I could package a few 400mm x 400mm 'ish' Panels to be posted, if my weekly Journey's are not passing local to an interested party.
I am also keen to try out a Natural Product and Canvas is very attractive, especially after hearing recordings on this Thread with it used as the DPS.
There is one more itch to scratch for a use of a Natural Material and that will be a very thin wood material with a soaking of Shellac, as I have seen in other threads where damping is a required property for a material that a Shellac Soak Coating can enhance the measurements recorded for damping and dissipation of a material.
Shellac is as Natural as it gets, as it is produced from secretions from the Lac Beetle insect, it is very stable and long lasting.
It also has very minimum elastic properties and is resistant to UV break down.
Most importantly, and to really get the party going, Is there any 'Exciters' I could purchase from a UK members redundant parts?
Leob,I don't suspect the HF roll off is a measurement issue. I'm just careful drawing to much conclusions about the details in the HF response with a cheap mic. The overall slope seems correct to my ears at least, and the printed plastic is a bit duller than the cardboard and PC.
I was surprised how close the graphs where after doing the noise measurement, so redid it a couple of times with same result. Indeed I should zoom more. The difference in the graph is 10dB in several places, and perhaps comparing noise and a sweep is not really the same? Can try to do a FR with noise and see if it makes a difference.
Here is the dampened version with more zoom
View attachment 1032830
Indeed bass response is quite similar. It is more uneven in the thinner plate, but that can be the distortion messing up the graph as well. But if anything is tied to mass it is not obvious in the bass region, and the flexibility of the plate seems the most critical factor.
The HF roll off is not very steep so why not but the bass roll off is unusually steep. Almost the same for both panels is also strange. There is perhaps something to check.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- A Study of DMLs as a Full Range Speaker