Behringer UMC 202HD for measurements

Tested conductivity/continuity:
  • The back panel is metal
  • The main box is metal, not plastic, but with paint
  • The front panel is plastic
  • The back panel's coating doesn't conduct
  • There is no provision for contacting the grounding tab to the back panel because of the coating
  • There is no provision for the back panel making proper contact with the main box (coating + paint)
No wonder, then, that the PCB isn't well shielded - the shielding is deficient.

Are you sure this is an EMI coating?
 
The box is aluminum, correct! I was fooled by the plastic front panel. I can't tell much about the coating as this was suggested by other members. The rear panel is bare metal from inside and I can verify continuity with pcb ground in mine. Perhaps things have changed in the production meanwhile?
 
Hey here guy's...

So finally i got around doing YashN's mod + scratching/cutting the pcb-trace to the phantom-power + making better connection to Behringer chassis.
With thoose 3 things i get good results now.

Connection between R out ---> R in is plain MONO jack.
I tried to calibrate the soundcard in REW, but i'am not sure i got it right, will do some more experiment's ofcause.

Thanks all for getting here now 😎

EDIT :: There are good connection between potmeters, backplate, metal parts on chassis now!

Jesper.
 

Attachments

  • Calibrate_sinus.png
    Calibrate_sinus.png
    53.6 KB · Views: 231
  • LoopBack.png
    LoopBack.png
    43.6 KB · Views: 238
  • IMG_1873.jpg
    IMG_1873.jpg
    597.5 KB · Views: 241
  • IMG_1874.jpg
    IMG_1874.jpg
    533.2 KB · Views: 227
  • IMG_1876.jpg
    IMG_1876.jpg
    492.1 KB · Views: 310
  • UMC202HD_Mod.png
    UMC202HD_Mod.png
    23.6 KB · Views: 321
  • cxema.pdf
    cxema.pdf
    270.6 KB · Views: 148
  • IMG_1877.jpg
    IMG_1877.jpg
    382.7 KB · Views: 309
Looking good.

Note that there is really no need to cut any trace. The removal of inductor L4 achieves the same thing as suggested by Alfred.

I would also scratch the whole internal periphery of the backplate, the area around the screws in the back plate, and scratch the black paint off the very edge at the back of the main box for additional shielding.

The front panel remains a liability though. Additionally, with the new grounding lug and screw you installed, you want to ensure that the area just underneath the lug is free of black paint.

This new lug and screw isn't really necessary IMO: you can improve the shielding as described above and ensure the little tabs on the grounding pads touch the areas you scratched. There may be a need to install a piece of cardboard in there between the pads and the tabs make good contact to the back plate.

I wonder if we can remove the inductors at the inputs and outputs.
 
Hello,
in the meantime I received the filter PCBs, loaded and tested them. The external one is in an alu box from Hammond. The small one will be mounted in the UMC. R98 and R99 will be removed and the filter connected in between. See photos and plots. The filter is a 4. order Tschebyscheff low pass with 0.1 dB ripple in the pass band and 21 KHz corner frequency (But you can use any low pass filter). If anyone is interested in some PCB (Blank Boards), just let me know. (alfred_rosenkraenzer@gmx.de). By the way, my web page: www.alfredrosenkraenzer.de
Measurements are done with the RME interface at 192 KHz.
 

Attachments

  • Ext-Filter1.jpg
    Ext-Filter1.jpg
    70.4 KB · Views: 149
  • Ext-Filter2.jpg
    Ext-Filter2.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 127
  • IMG_0594r.jpg
    IMG_0594r.jpg
    96.3 KB · Views: 141
  • IMG_0595r.jpg
    IMG_0595r.jpg
    77.4 KB · Views: 151
  • IMG_0596r.jpg
    IMG_0596r.jpg
    108.4 KB · Views: 169
  • IMG_0600r.jpg
    IMG_0600r.jpg
    123.2 KB · Views: 168
  • Int-Filter1.jpg
    Int-Filter1.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 147
  • Int-Filter2.jpg
    Int-Filter2.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 139
  • Tsch-0p1-21KHz-4O-Freq1.jpg
    Tsch-0p1-21KHz-4O-Freq1.jpg
    141.2 KB · Views: 158
  • Tsch-0p1-21KHz-4O-Freq2.jpg
    Tsch-0p1-21KHz-4O-Freq2.jpg
    122.9 KB · Views: 158
  • Tsch-0p1-21KHz-4O-Spec.jpg
    Tsch-0p1-21KHz-4O-Spec.jpg
    212.1 KB · Views: 154
The internal filter PCB runs on the internal analog power supply of the UMC (4.5 V). You need an amplifier like the AD8692 used by Behringer.
The external uses +-15 V with +-12V regulators on the PCB. Here you can use NE5532 and many others.
The frequency response measurement of the pure filter board (not with the UMC) was made with my RME interface at 192 KHz.
The spectrum also. There will be no difference using 48 KHz for the spectrum.
Please specify your question. Do you want to see the Spectrum of the UMC generator with the filter measured with the RME?
 
Here are some pictures. The .png files are made with a RF spectrum analyzer up to 3 MHz. The .jpg with the RME. Please note that there is noise at the higher end of the RME even without signal. The names of the pictures tells you what is what.
 

Attachments

  • RME192K-alone-Spec.jpg
    RME192K-alone-Spec.jpg
    163.9 KB · Views: 109
  • Spec-alone.png
    Spec-alone.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 112
  • UMC-48K-Filt-RME192K-Spec.jpg
    UMC-48K-Filt-RME192K-Spec.jpg
    198.3 KB · Views: 111
  • UMC-48K-noFilt-RME192K-Spec.jpg
    UMC-48K-noFilt-RME192K-Spec.jpg
    202.5 KB · Views: 115
  • UMC-noFilt.png
    UMC-noFilt.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 114
  • UMC-withFilt.png
    UMC-withFilt.png
    9 KB · Views: 117
I will carefully look out for not going higher than this MAX level MagicBus.

While i'am stock here at home rest of the week, i did try another experiement with batterysupply to the Behringer.

Jesper...

Picture's speak for themself. Batterypower is not better, likely a bit worse in my case.
The measurement's are with same setting's and adjustment's. (I use my Right channel in/out with YashN's mod etc... as i wrote in earlier post)
 

Attachments

  • PC-power.png
    PC-power.png
    60 KB · Views: 144
  • Batt-power.png
    Batt-power.png
    57.2 KB · Views: 133
  • IMG_1884.jpg
    IMG_1884.jpg
    413.1 KB · Views: 141