Found service manual for real Revox 285.
Different transistors. Rails 52V
I guess original printout did not show transistor types or values, and someone added it manually.
Luckily, Q109 is not BC327
add a repeater
This is my latest results.
I also tried Jfet input - it looks like it's a drop-in replacement.
Sim attached (for both: BJT and JefFet input)
LSK170A/B work just fine, same results overall as with BJTs.
I checked my stash of Jfets - I have LSK170 grade D.
Unfortunately grade C and D does not work in this simulation.
I thought that since we have LTP coscoded here, this is great opportunity to use Jfets..
I also tried Revox voltage shifter with a resistor - bad idea.
I also tried Jfet input - it looks like it's a drop-in replacement.
Sim attached (for both: BJT and JefFet input)
LSK170A/B work just fine, same results overall as with BJTs.
I checked my stash of Jfets - I have LSK170 grade D.
Unfortunately grade C and D does not work in this simulation.
I thought that since we have LTP coscoded here, this is great opportunity to use Jfets..
I also tried Revox voltage shifter with a resistor - bad idea.
Attachments
-
kletzov_1983.n29.1.png75.2 KB · Views: 164
-
kletzov_1983.n29.1.opg.png78.6 KB · Views: 165
-
kletzov_1983.n29.1.fft.png25.2 KB · Views: 158
-
kletzov_1983.n29.1.thd.png24.1 KB · Views: 150
-
kletzov_1983.n29.1.square.png57.3 KB · Views: 95
-
kletzov_1983.n29.1.asc11.3 KB · Views: 46
-
kletzov_1983.jfet.asc10.4 KB · Views: 47
>All right. That's the question. Common mode voltage. Ignore or fight ?
I'm going to assume this is rhetorical question
If you don't know the answer, how would I know?
2 ways.
1) enter feedback for tracking.
2 . to fix the problem.Switch scheme the amplifier to the inverting option.
1 option will complicate the scheme of the amplifier.
3 just ignore the problem.
Last edited:
I went back to posts Hayk (kokoriantz) hinted about few days ago.
Eg. post #75
Here is the sim of it. It's simple, symmetrical (that's disputable if this is good or bad ), perhaps something can be made of it?
What you think of it?
2 * CCS can be added on top and bottom of LTP, and maybe 2 buffers
between LTP and VAS?
As is, distortions are little bit too high, I guess, but it's simple.
Eg. post #75
Here is the sim of it. It's simple, symmetrical (that's disputable if this is good or bad ), perhaps something can be made of it?
What you think of it?
2 * CCS can be added on top and bottom of LTP, and maybe 2 buffers
between LTP and VAS?
As is, distortions are little bit too high, I guess, but it's simple.
Attachments
I have a similar circuit, an inverted amp, ~ 0,006 THD, but a little to high DC:
This is CFA ?
I guess not...
Last edited:
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Unusual amp from 1987