• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

What tubes for a OTL tube amp?

Hello friend, 6AS7G in truth it is much better because it has a heat sink on top of its structure, attached to the G1, this allows the stage in class A2 or AB2 to work, which generates grid current and nor 6080 neither 6AS7GA do not have.

This is not exactly true. I just pulled a sample of 15 6080/6AS7GA tubes out of a box and:


10 have the big G1 heatsink on top. 5 of those are 6080s, 5 are 6AS7GAs.
5 have the small folded box shaped G1 heatsink. 4 of those are 6AS7GAs and 1 is a 6080.
 
Last edited:
Here's an interesting take on an OTL amp;

Inverted Tube Operation

I've build several SE-OTL amps that have all sounded excellent, including;

  • the original Transcendent SE-OTL kit that used 6H30pi tubes
  • Transcendent Minibeast kit with EL509 tubes
  • The Transcendent 300B SE-OTL, now much modified with a revised output configuration and Voltage Controlled Current Source DC filament supplies
  • I'm working on a new project that will use a single output tube, either a 6C33C or 13E1.

Apart from the Minibeast, which puts out a mammoth 4WPC, these are all flea-power amps (around 1.5W) to suit my speaker choice so will only have a narrow interest. The 300B is the best sounding IMO - will be interesting to see how the new project compares.
 
12B4 Rp is 1030 ohms, I'm looking about 50 ohms.
looks like my option is 6C19P, but I can not find the detail datasheet, that shows Rp curve.

Ah... Good to know. Rp of 1000 is "low" compared to the 7700 or so of a 6SN7, right? :D

I considered an OTL but after reading this article from Patrick Turner, I decided matching transformers made MUCH more sense in my case.

OTL-amps-pros-cons
 
After read again this article I deny this kind of amplifier. To many solutions for avoid transformers. After reading this article again, I deny this type of amp. To many solutions to avoid transformers. I may have become obsessed with the issue of avoiding a transformer on the way out. Then I discovered that the most important part of a HiFi chain are the transducers, the choice of crossover frequencies. This is key and gives the different tone of each system. I think if an amplifier respects the load impedance by adapting it to its damping, anyone can sound good. I had an OTL with 10 6AS7G per channel, I could never tune in without a fuse blowing, it was terribly hot and I spent more time in my workshop than in my living room. I kept introspecting the idea, many nights I went to sleep trying to improve the idea, I bought a software to calculate the optimal polarization and the minimum distortion. And an important issue, taken from that paper that the colleague published, the output of an OTL in the case of the Circlotron, is a cathodic follower, that is, I do not even have a triode transfer curve and I can use any power mosfet in that place either in circlotron or complementary. Respecting that the front end part is valvular or with triodes, even using a driver transformer. The idea of ​​the OTL is romantic, it is a retrograde search for an ideal for which, a lot of power is consumed and something profitable is not obtained, except by using 40 valves per channel and in parallel.
 
@dady

I have designed and built a fully differential OTL based circlotron topology with 4x6C33C driven by individual cathode followers and I have never encountered any problems with it.
I use separate supplies for the input differential cascode, driver stage and power stage. Being fully differential it has two identical oposing GNFB loops at about 25dB. I must admit it sounds better without GNFB because it has more headroom.
I use it with my QUAD ESL 63 speakers
Silviu
 
Last edited: