Is it possible to cover the whole spectrum, high SPL, low distortion with a 2-way?

Personally, I don't like the thick roll surround, even less for this coax. Together with the CONEX spider the Santoprene™surround contributes to the rather low Fs of 57Hz. This is useful for a small stand alone coax design, but unnecessary for the Monitor 8.12.

Again, if I would clone the Monitor 8.12 Mk2, I wouldn't use the Eminence for woofer duties.
Some may consider this useless fetish/OCD, but I tend to choose drivers from the same manufacturer, especially if woofers are concerned.

With roll surrounds in the coaxes, there should be roll surrounds in the woofers as well.

+1 If using a helper woofer, the wide range driver's Fs should go no lower than necessary to cover the XO BW, which would theoretically be around 250 Hz for HIFI, so ~75-125 Hz and up an octave for high power apps.

+1 All the pioneer's drivers were voiced as matched systems and hopefully the better manufacturers are carrying on the tradition.

+1 Given my druthers, for HIFI I prefer HE designs with doped accordion surrounds, impregnated cloth spiders.

GM
 
I should hope the polars are better than those of its hornless brother
 

Attachments

  • 8NCX-T-800x800.jpg
    8NCX-T-800x800.jpg
    86.8 KB · Views: 379
  • 8NCX-800x800.jpg
    8NCX-800x800.jpg
    98.5 KB · Views: 378
  • Oberton8inch_ver-800x800.png
    Oberton8inch_ver-800x800.png
    13.7 KB · Views: 383
Last edited:
The dispersion of my kitchen speakers is in the same ballpark. For proper stereo listening one has to be selfish. But for casual background music it still works quite well though.
Even though everything is there, there is maybe a little lack of high-end sparkle sometimes but that could be solved by an additional supertweeter (or maybe an ambient tweeter on the backside).

Regards

Charles
 
You have to draw it out on a scaled floor plan to be sure, but 60 deg 'fits' a lot of rooms whereas 90 deg often must be over toe'd in or centered in the room corners to keep them off the side walls unless setting fairly close. Definitely better for THX reference HT.

GM
 
The 60x40 dispersion is about the max for 2" exit drivers without resorting to extreme diffraction.

The MRII 564 is considered one of the best (sounding) Mantaray horns. If you search, you'll find plenty of reviews.
I am not familiar with this particular horn, but I own B&C ME60s which is a slightly modified clone of the MRII 564.

If you look at the dispersion graph and polar maps, you'll notice there's no pattern flip all the way down to 500Hz.
This may not be a necessity, but it's still a nice feature.

Such a horn could work nicely in a long room, that's deeper than it's wide.
 

Attachments

  • MRII 564_Pagina_1.jpg
    MRII 564_Pagina_1.jpg
    734.5 KB · Views: 315
  • MRII 564_Pagina_2.jpg
    MRII 564_Pagina_2.jpg
    754 KB · Views: 313
  • MRII 564_Pagina_3.jpg
    MRII 564_Pagina_3.jpg
    659.5 KB · Views: 75
  • MRII 564_Pagina_4.jpg
    MRII 564_Pagina_4.jpg
    404.9 KB · Views: 72
Last edited:
Both for power and pattern, I would say.
60x40 is a common dispersion pattern, used for many popular horns like the XT1464.

These horns are designed with commercial applications in mind, which is not to say they can't be used at home.
Charles is one of the many happy XT1464 owners.
 
Last edited:
If you compare dimensions of the MRII 564 to those of the ME60, you'll notice the former is nearly 12 cm deeper.
This in order to match the long snout of to the oldskool Altec drivers, which are decendants of the JBL 375 / WE 594A.
 

Attachments

  • 594-A Cut.jpg
    594-A Cut.jpg
    959.3 KB · Views: 91
  • 375-xsect-crop (1).jpg
    375-xsect-crop (1).jpg
    143.6 KB · Views: 72
  • 288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_4.jpg
    288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_4.jpg
    156.8 KB · Views: 357
  • 288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_3.jpg
    288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_3.jpg
    190.2 KB · Views: 369
  • 288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_2.jpg
    288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_2.jpg
    165.2 KB · Views: 374
  • 288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_1.jpg
    288-K-Series_hfdriver_spec_sheet_Pagina_1.jpg
    191.9 KB · Views: 386
  • page07.jpg
    page07.jpg
    110.5 KB · Views: 119
  • DSC_9563.JPG
    DSC_9563.JPG
    305.8 KB · Views: 102
  • DSC_9558.JPG
    DSC_9558.JPG
    193.2 KB · Views: 90
  • DSC_9555.JPG
    DSC_9555.JPG
    131.2 KB · Views: 92
Last edited:
My ME60s with (pancake, 34,7° exit) DE75 drivers:
(I attenuate/EQ these to about 95dB, mounted to much bigger horns. The breakup is better behaved than with many newer 2" drivers and there's no need for tweeters.)
 

Attachments

  • DE75-8 + ME 75_3.JPG
    DE75-8 + ME 75_3.JPG
    38.4 KB · Views: 153
  • DE75-8 + ME 75_1.JPG
    DE75-8 + ME 75_1.JPG
    47.5 KB · Views: 144
  • mereni_de75_me60.jpg
    mereni_de75_me60.jpg
    568.4 KB · Views: 149
Last edited:
Altec had THX certification in mind, though IIRC only the later EV badged prosound speakers were submitted/approved.

GM

The birth of THX:

F9-07B-720x450.png


Has anybody that follows this thread ever experienced such a 'Keele style' JBL cinema install? I haven't, at least not consciously.

I am convinced, with the best drivers for the 2360 (some say 2446 with Alu dia), Crown DriveCore amplifiers and Lake or similar DSP, such an install could still sound fantastic.
 
Last edited:
Someone went overboard with cosmetics...

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.



Asking price was $12.000 a pair.
For that amount you get used components without any upgrades + a shiny finish.


For $12G, i'd expect at the minimum, that the cabinets match. One has two pieces of veneer or solid boards composing the sides, the other three.