SARA-2016

The prototype-ptil 😛
 

Attachments

  • prototiptil 1.jpg
    prototiptil 1.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 1,115
  • prototiptil 2.jpg
    prototiptil 2.jpg
    102.1 KB · Views: 1,137
In 2012 was a more complex schematic. It is harder to build SARA-2012. For these reason I redesign the schematic, I simplified it. The result it is SARA -2016. All the variants from this topic are based on SARA-2016. So, I recommend you this road. SARA-2012 it is a closed road.
Thanks, I want to put one together. I know the 2SC5200 / 2SA1943 is suppose to be excellent and SARA-2016 seem like a good starting point.
 
Couple questions, I was hoping you could answer?
1) Why does Alex's PCB have MJL3281/MJL4302 - I don't think those are complimentary pairs, right? Shouldn't it be MJL4281/MJL4302, or MJL3281/MJL1302?
2) Why does Vlads use 2SC5200/2SA1943?
Is there differences other than the mosfet choice I'm missing, or just a preference.
Seems like the 2SC/2SA are lesser mosfets - less voltage max?
I'm sure I am missing some very compelling reasons one was chosen over the other, so I was hoping someone could explain.
 
1) Maybe was an Alex typo. You must to choose the complementary pair. You are right.

2) You can choose any power bipolar complementary pair transistor with 30Mhz Ft. Alex use mjl4281, Vlad use 2sc5200, I use here TTC5200. For all that three different pairs, the schematic meets design requirements.You can choose the cheapest or you can choose the stronger. Generaly speaking, I preferr the smallest Cob transistor.
 
Last edited:
I don't know If I've listened to the Toshiba transistors (2SC5200/2SA1943) or the ones you are using TTC5200/TTA1943. I know they are popular, but now that there is a list of transistors and options, I do wonder how they compare to one another. Only way to find out is to try them and that can be done during construction and experimentation phase.

@ bullittstang: One might see the transistor swapping or choice as "tube rolling". They will sound different and only way to make sure one pick the right transistor - besides values - is to listen to them.
 
I understand. The reason I asked was because I did not see the transistors, but I inspected the picture and can now see that they are mounted underneath the PCB. Rather unusual placement but works I assume.

Looking forward to the more finished version and measurement 🙂
 
I see. I am leaning more towards the classic design where the transistors are placed on the edge, simply because the thermal issues (heat) can be taken care of in a better way. Any heat on the PCB is bad and will cause heat issues in resistors and such. Naturally, one can place such components far away, letting all the components "breath" - but this has nothing to do with the overall schematic and function. Each to ones own.

So as I said, looking forward to your finalised version and when I have the opportunity, produce my interpretation and present it 🙂